• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
May 19, 2026
5
0
36
Jacksonville
✟629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
May 19, 2026
5
0
36
Jacksonville
✟629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Pope said: "As a shepherd I cannot be in favor of war" regarding the war between USA and Iran. Source: https://www.usccb.org/news/2026/pope-condemns-killings-iran-speaks-migration-same-sex-blessings

What do you think about the following response?

God, please give us the words to say, Amen

Lord-willing, will post the response as replies

===

Matthew 16:18

And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it.


---

Jesus named Simon "Peter"

---

Matthew 16:21-23

From that time on Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things at the hands of the elders, chief priests, and scribes, and that He must be killed and on the third day be raised to life.

Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him. "Far be it from You, Lord!" he said. "This shall never happen to You!"

But Jesus turned and said to Peter, "Get behind Me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to Me. For you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."


---

Just a few verses later, Jesus prophesied His death

Peter tried to correct Jesus

And Jesus rebuked Peter, calling Peter "Satan"

Therefore: We must not correct Jesus - we must not correct the prophecies of Jesus - we must not correct the words of Jesus

---

Matthew 24:6-7

You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. These things must happen, but the end is still to come.

Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places.


---

Jesus told His disciples what would happen in the future

Jesus said there will be wars

Jesus said nation will rise against nation

Jesus said kingdom will rise against kingdom

Would it have been wise to interrupt and correct Jesus by saying: "May your words prophesying these wars never come to pass, Lord, for God wants only peace, never war!"

Would Jesus have rebuked someone for trying to correct Jesus?

Today, would it be wise to correct Jesus by saying: "Jesus was wrong about future wars - there must be no wars - no country who is at war is within the will of God!" ?

Isn't it the will of God for every word of God to come true?

---

Matthew 24:35

Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will never pass away.


---

Are not all words of Jesus the will of God?

Is war ever the will of God?

---

Jeremiah 25:8-9

Therefore this is what the LORD of Hosts says: 'Because you have not obeyed My words,

behold, I will summon all the families of the north, declares the LORD, and I will send for My servant Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, whom I will bring against this land, against its residents, and against all the surrounding nations. So I will devote them to destruction and make them an object of horror and contempt, an everlasting desolation.


---

Didn't the Jews disobey the words of God?

Didn't God judge the Jews in Judah for their disobedience?

Didn't God send Nebuchadnezzar to destroy?

Didn't God call Nebuchadnezzar a servant of God?

---

Isaiah 45:1 This is what the LORD says to Cyrus His anointed, whose right hand I have grasped to subdue nations before him, to disarm kings, to open the doors before him, so that the gates will not be shut:

---

Wasn't King Cyrus the anointed of the LORD?

Didn't God choose King Cyrus to conquer?

Doesn't this mean that God has, at times, willed war?

---

Isaiah 45:3 I will give you the treasures of darkness and the riches hidden in secret places, so that you may know that I am the LORD, the God of Israel, who calls you by name. God called King Cyrus by name

---

Isaiah 45:5 I am the LORD, and there is no other; there is no God but Me. I will equip you for battle, though you have not known Me,

---

God equipped King Cyrus for battle

---

Isaiah 45:13 I will raise up Cyrus in righteousness, and I will make all his ways straight. He will rebuild My city and set My exiles free, but not for payment or reward, says the LORD of Hosts."

---

God made King Cyrus righteous

God made all the ways of Cyrus straight

Does that mean King Cyrus was righteous in God's sight in war?

If a king carries out the judgment of God on a nation, is the king justified in his war?

Was King David justified in all his killing besides Uriah?

---

Isaiah 48:14-15 Come together, all of you, and listen: Which of the idols has foretold these things? The LORD's chosen ally will carry out His desire against Babylon, and His arm will be against the Chaldeans. I, even I, have spoken; yes, I have called him. I have brought him, and he will succeed in his mission.

---

The one who was against Babylon was the ally of God?

Can a nation who attacks another be an ally of God?

---

Genesis 15:14 But I will judge the nation they serve as slaves, and afterward they will depart with many possessions.

---

Does God judge nations?

---

Genesis 15:16 In the fourth generation your descendants will return here, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete."

---

Does God have a timeline of the sins of nations and when they'll be judged?

---

1 Samuel 15:2

This is what the LORD of Hosts says: 'I witnessed what the Amalekites did to the Israelites when they ambushed them on their way up from Egypt.


---

Didn't the Amalekites sin against God's chosen people?

---

1 Samuel 15:3

Now go and attack the Amalekites and devote to destruction all that belongs to them. Do not spare them, but put to death men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.'"


---

Didn't God judge the Amalekites?

Didn't God order King Saul to kill all the Amalekites?

---

1 Samuel 15:9

Saul and his troops spared Agag, along with the best of the sheep and cattle, the fat calves and lambs, and the best of everything else. They were unwilling to destroy them, but they devoted to destruction all that was despised and worthless.


---

Didn't Saul disobey God by allowing people to live?

Hasn't God commanded the killing of people?

---

1 Samuel 15:22

But Samuel declared: "Does the LORD delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as much as in obedience to His voice? Behold, obedience is better than sacrifice, and attentiveness is better than the fat of rams.


---

What if Saul had said, "As nations, we always need to choose peace, never war. So I didn't kill all those people"?

Would Samuel say, "Does God desire sparing lives He has already judged to die more than obedience to His voice?"

---

Does God judge nations today who have harmed the chosen people of God?
 
Upvote 0
May 19, 2026
5
0
36
Jacksonville
✟629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Pope said: "As a shepherd I cannot be in favor of war" regarding the war between USA and Iran. Source: Pope condemns killings in Iran, speaks on migration, same-sex blessings

What do you think about the following response?

God, please give us the words to say, Amen

Lord-willing, will post the response as replies
...

Could someone say that God only killed in the Old Testament?

---

Acts 5:3-5

Then Peter said, "Ananias, how is it that Satan has filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and withhold some of the proceeds from the land?

Did it not belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, was it not at your disposal? How could you conceive such a deed in your heart? You have not lied to men, but to God!"

On hearing these words, Ananias fell down and died. And great fear came over all who heard what had happened.


---

Didn't God kill Ananias in the New Testament?

---

Acts 5:8-10

"Tell me," said Peter, "is this the price you and your husband got for the land?" "Yes," she answered, "that is the price."

"How could you agree to test the Spirit of the Lord?" Peter replied. "Look, the feet of the men who buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out also."

At that instant she fell down at his feet and died. Then the young men came in and, finding her dead, carried her out and buried her beside her husband.


---

Didn't God also kill Sapphira, the wife of Ananias in the New Testament?

---

Acts 12:21-23

On the appointed day, Herod donned his royal robes, sat on his throne, and addressed the people.

And they began to shout, "This is the voice of a god, not a man!"

Immediately, because Herod did not give glory to God, an angel of the Lord struck him down, and he was eaten by worms and died.


---

Didn't God kill King Herod?

---

1 Corinthians 11:27-32

Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord.

Each one must examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup.

For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body eats and drinks judgment on himself.

That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep.

Now if we judged ourselves properly, we would not come under judgment.

But when we are judged by the Lord, we are being disciplined so that we will not be condemned with the world.


---

In the New Testament, hasn't God killed Christians so that they are not condemned with the world?

---

God killed many people in the Old Testament

And doesn't God also kill people in the New Testament?

---

Jeremiah 14:13-15

"Ah, Lord GOD!" I replied, "Look, the prophets are telling them, 'You will not see the sword or suffer famine, but I will give you lasting peace in this place.'"

"The prophets are prophesying lies in My name," replied the LORD. "I did not send them or appoint them or speak to them. They are prophesying to you a false vision, a worthless divination, the futility and delusion of their own minds.

Therefore this is what the LORD says about the prophets who prophesy in My name: I did not send them, yet they say, 'No sword or famine will touch this land.' By sword and famine these very prophets will meet their end!


---

Weren't there false prophets who falsely prophesied peace?

And didn't God kill these false prophets for leading people astray with their lies about peace?

---

2 Thessalonians 2:8

And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of His mouth and annihilate by the majesty of His arrival.


---

Won't Jesus kill the lawless one with the breath of His mouth?

Doesn't that mean Jesus will kill the lawless one someday?

---

Revelation 19:19-21

Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth with their armies assembled to wage war against the One seated on the horse, and against His army.

But the beast was captured along with the false prophet, who on its behalf had performed signs deceiving those who had the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. Both the beast and the false prophet were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur.

And the rest were killed with the sword that proceeded from the mouth of the One seated on the horse. And all the birds gorged themselves on their flesh.


---

Won't Jesus kill the soldiers in the armies that warred against Him with the sword that proceeds out of His mouth?

Then, in the future, won't Jesus Himself enforce the death penalty?

How then can there be no more death penalty?

---

Don't all these New Testament passages mean God can still judge someone today with death?

And doesn't that mean that if God has judged someone to die, we should not correct the judgment of God?

---

Matthew 10:34

Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.


---

Didn't Jesus say He didn't come to bring peace, but a sword?

Would it have been wise for one of the disciples of Jesus to correct Jesus by saying: "No, Lord, you must not bring a sword, for You are the Prince of Peace, not the Lord of Armies!" ?

---

Matthew 26:51-52

At this, one of Jesus' companions drew his sword and struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his ear.

"Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him. "For all who draw the sword will die by the sword.


---

John 18:10-11

Then Simon Peter drew his sword and struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his right ear. The servant's name was Malchus.

"Put your sword back in its sheath!" Jesus said to Peter. "Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given Me?"


---

Don’t those who live by the sword die by the sword?

Therefore, Peter should not wield a sword?

---

Romans 2:6-11

God "will repay each one according to his deeds."

To those who by perseverance in doing good seek glory, honor, and immortality, He will give eternal life.

But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow wickedness, there will be wrath and anger.

There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil, first for the Jew, then for the Greek;

but glory, honor, and peace for everyone who does good, first for the Jew, then for the Greek.

For God does not show favoritism.


---

In the New Testament, doesn't God promise to repay us according to our deeds?

In the New Testament, doesn't God promise to repay the self-seeking who reject the truth and follow wickedness with wrath?

---

Galatians 6:7-10

Do not be deceived: God is not to be mocked. Whatever a man sows, he will reap in return.

The one who sows to please his flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; but the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.

Let us not grow weary in well-doing, for in due time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.

Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to the family of faith.


---

If someone sows the sword, will they reap the sword?

If someone sows murder, will they themselves reap death?

---

Genesis 9:6

Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man his blood will be shed; for in His own image God has made mankind.


---

Didn't God institute the death penalty for murderers in Genesis at the time of Noah?

Therefore, are those who murder to be killed?

---

Do you forbid all killing?

What about police officers? Are police officers allowed to have weapons? Are police officers allowed to have lethal weapons? Are police officers allowed to stop mass shooters by killing them? Are police officers allowed to kill those who are attempting to assassinate someone? Or do you say police officers should not have lethal weapons? Or do you say police officers should not have weapons at all?

---

Romans 13:1-6

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.

Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment.

For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval,

for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer.


---

Isn't every President, judge, lawmaker and every other government official appointed by God?

Isn't every police officer appointed by God?

Aren't government officials servants of God?

Don't governments carry out the wrath of God on people God has judged?

Doesn't the government carry the sword?

Today, then, don't police officers "carry the gun," as avengers who carry out God's wrath on the wrongdoer?

Didn't God appoint governments to have the duty to serve God by punishing evil, including the death penalty?

---

Don't Swiss officers carry guns to protect the Pope? Then doesn't the Pope understand the necessity of using lethal force to defend?

Then doesn't the Pope agree that law enforcement can use firearms?

---

If an individual is a threat, then the police intervene on behalf of the government

If a country is a threat, should all other countries do nothing?

In the Holocaust, should the Pope just tell everyone to choose peace over war? Should the Pope forbid countries from attacking and defeating Hitler? Should the Pope just strongly urge Hitler to stop killing and choose peace?

What if Hitler didn't listen to the Pope? What if Hitler kept killing people? What if people were dying each day because of Hitler? Should the Pope still advise all other countries to choose "peace" and do nothing to stop Hitler? Or would the Pope urge someone to stop the Holocaust?

If a country is a threat, do other countries have an obligation to "police" countries committing evil?

In the same way police officers use weapons on an individual who is a threat, is it good for a country to use weapons on another country who is a threat?

If you oppose militaries using weapons, why don't you also oppose police officers using weapons?

If you believe police officers are needed to defend people from evil actors, why aren't militaries also needed to defend people from evil actors?

---

God chose Nebuchadnezzar to judge Israel (see Jeremiah 25:8-9 from earlier)

---

Romans 11:1-2

I ask then, did God reject His people? Certainly not! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin.

God did not reject His people, whom He foreknew. Do you not know what the Scripture says about Elijah, how he appealed to God against Israel:


---

Aren't the Jews still God's chosen people?

Hasn't Iran been against Israel?

Hasn't Iran wanted nuclear weapons?

If Iran had nuclear weapons, could that threaten Israel?

Hasn't Trump wanted to prevent Iran from having nuclear weapons?

How do you know God hasn't put it in the heart of Trump to keep Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, ultimately to protect His chosen people Israel?

How do you know God isn't using the USA to defend Israel?

How do you know God hasn't chosen the USA to judge Iran?

I don't claim to know all the purposes God is using the USA or Trump for in the world

But if you judge the actions of Trump or the USA as immoral, then aren't you claiming to know that God is not using the USA for these kinds of purposes?

---

Our Father, who is in heaven, please give us wisdom to understand and apply Your Word, in the name of Jesus, Amen

---

Ecclesiastes 3:1

To everything there is a season, and a time for every purpose under heaven:


---

Ecclesiastes 3:3

a time to kill and a time to heal, a time to break down and a time to build,


---

Ecclesiastes 3:8

a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace.
 
Upvote 0

Matt5

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2019
1,145
474
Zürich
✟212,060.00
Country
Switzerland
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I asked Grok AI to summarize all of your posts:

Summary of the thread/posts by JESUSrosetolife on Christianforums.com

Thread Title/Topic:
"Does the Bible provide justification for war, sometimes?"
Context: Posted in response to Pope Francis (or a recent Pope) stating "As a shepherd I cannot be in favor of war" regarding the USA-Iran conflict (linked to a USCCB article). The poster shares a detailed biblical rebuttal/scriptural response they plan to post as replies, asking for feedback ("What do you think...? God please give us the words...").

Core Argument​

The Bible does provide justification for war in certain cases. While God desires peace overall, Scripture shows He sovereignly ordains, commands, equips, or uses wars for judgment, punishment of evil, protection of His people, and fulfillment of prophecy. Opposing all war (as the Pope's statement implies) can contradict God's Word, prophecies, and appointed authorities. Correcting Jesus/God on the reality of wars is unwise.

Key Biblical Sections & Points​

  1. Jesus' Own Teachings (New Testament Foundation)
    • Matthew 24:6-7: Wars and rumors of wars "must happen" — do not be alarmed. Nations/kingdoms will rise against each other.
    • Matthew 24:35: Jesus' words (including on wars) will never pass away — they are God's will.
    • Matthew 10:34: Jesus came not to bring peace but a sword.
    • Rebuke of Peter (Matthew 16:21-23): Peter was called "Satan" for opposing Jesus' predicted suffering/death. Similarly, opposing prophesied wars is dangerous.
  2. Old Testament Examples of God Ordaining War/Judgment
    • God sends Nebuchadnezzar (called "My servant") to destroy Judah for disobedience (Jeremiah 25:8-9).
    • Cyrus: God's "anointed," equipped for battle, used to conquer and free exiles (Isaiah 45).
    • Command to Saul to utterly destroy the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15) — sparing them was disobedience.
    • God judges nations when their iniquity is full (Genesis 15:16) or for harming His people (Amalekites).
  3. New Testament Examples of God Still Bringing Death/Judgment
    • Ananias and Sapphira struck dead (Acts 5).
    • Herod killed by angel/worms for not glorifying God (Acts 12).
    • Discipline/judgment causing weakness, sickness, or death among unworthy Communion participants (1 Corinthians 11).
    • Future: Jesus slays the lawless one (2 Thessalonians 2:8) and kills armies at His return with the sword from His mouth (Revelation 19).
    • False prophets promising "peace" when God sends sword/famine are judged (Jeremiah 14).
  4. Authority, Government, and the Sword
    • Romans 13:1-6: Governing authorities (presidents, police, etc.) are instituted by God, bear the sword as "servants of God" and "avengers" carrying out wrath on wrongdoers.
    • Genesis 9:6: Death penalty for murder instituted post-flood.
    • Analogy: If police/militaries can use lethal force against individual threats (e.g., mass shooters), nations have similar obligation against evil regimes (e.g., Hitler, or a nuclear Iran threatening Israel).
    • Swiss guards with guns protecting the Pope implicitly acknowledge the need for force.
  5. Application to USA-Iran/Israel Context
    • Jews remain God's chosen people (Romans 11).
    • Iran has opposed Israel and sought nuclear weapons; USA/Trump actions may be God using one nation to protect Israel or judge another (paralleling Cyrus/Nebuchadnezzar).
    • We can't assume such wars are outside God's will without knowing His full purposes.
  6. Closing Themes
    • Ecclesiastes 3:1, 3, 8: There is "a time for war and a time for peace," "a time to kill," etc.
    • Galatians 6:7-8 & Romans 2: Sowing violence/wickedness reaps judgment.
    • Emphasis on obedience to God's Word over blanket "peace" statements.
    • Prayer for wisdom.

Overall Tone & Intent​

The posts form a comprehensive, scripture-heavy case (mostly direct quotes with brief commentary) defending "just war" or divinely sanctioned conflict under God's sovereignty. It critiques absolute pacifism (especially from church leaders) as potentially ignoring prophecy and God's historical actions. The poster frames it humbly (prayers for words/wisdom) but firmly challenges the Pope's stance by prioritizing Scripture.

The entire content is one user's multi-post argument (posts #1–3), with no visible replies from others in the provided text. It is strongly evangelical/Protestant-leaning in its emphasis on biblical authority over papal statements.