Jipsah
Blood Drinker
- Aug 17, 2005
- 14,369
- 4,819
- 72
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
not seeing that at all.Because "of the details" actually IN Rev 16 and 19.
Yeah, but none of that particulaly supports your take on what leads up to the final battle. That's pretty imposing a :meaning" on Scripture that comes from a scenario that yiu've thunk up a priori. Is this a common belief amongst SDAs?Texts that literally address the topic of end time, end of the world, All nations being instructed to gather together , Armageddon , Christ and His armies appearing in heaven, all armies of Earth gathered in opposition, destroyed in a singular event... IN THE TEXT
You don't appear tp be that opposed to it.as opposed to "making stuff up"
I hate tp break this to you, but that appears to be all youre offering.You don't appear to be willing to address anything but man made traditions outside of the Bible.
I'll bite. I don't know of anyone who believe anything like what you're describing.Why do that?
I think you'd find out pretty quickly that most Christians don't particularly believe in "aliens" at all. Most of us arewn't particularly adamant about the humanity or lack thereof of critters we don't believe exist at all. It's no good worrying about whether aliens are human or not if there aren't any aliens.All Christians agree that Aliens are NOT humans.
Bobody that I know of thinks they are. Then again I don'y know of anyone but you who uses the words "alien" and "angel" as though they were synonyms.Angels are NOT humans
Insistence on that word game doesn't help whatever argument you're trying to make., NOT from Earth. Even fallen angels are NOT from Earth.
That makes them "aliens" by definition.
Not difficult, just silly. Most Christians believe in angels and demons matter of faith. Some Christians believe in aliens, but I'd wager most don't. Very few Christians believe that "aliens" and "angels/demons" are the same thing. That's what makes your ideas sound so bizzare.This part is not even a tiny bit difficult.
Yeah, so we've all read. Where do the flying saucers come in?Rev 163 And I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of the beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits like frogs;
By your definition. Unfortunately, that's now the word "alien" is taken to mean. You're kinda hoist on your own linguistic petard.14 for they are spirits of demons, (by definition, "aliens")
That much is true. IRev 16 does not say one word about "angels attacking Earth"
I think it has more to do with your painfully awkward attempt to turn Spacemen and Flying Saucers, which probably don't exist at all, into essential parts of the Revelation narrative. We'll, E for Effort, but I don't think you've made your case at all. Your main problem is still this: You say "aliens are demons", and the response is "Wha aliens?" As well declare that aliens built the pyramids (as some actually do.) Fine, but first you have to demostrate that there are any aliens at all. You assume it a priopri. Most folks don't. And there the discussion ends.You make it appear as if you have no use at all for the texts identified for this topic in my initial response.... curious
Upvote
0