- Jul 23, 2019
- 1,230
- 463
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
You're not correcting my categories, you're replacing the apostles' categories with new ones. Every time Scripture speaks of salvation as God's act, you redefine it as an ""experience"" we maintain. Every time Scripture speaks of grace training believers after salvation, you redefine the training itself as salvation & every time Scripture says justification is apart from works, you redefine works as ""intrinsic to salvation"" so the contradiction disappears by definition.Our salvation from sin would be incomplete if we were only saved from the penalty of our sin while our lives continued to be directed at being doers of sin, so there is an aspect of our gift of salvation that we are experiencing in the present by repenting and redirecting our lives towards being doers of the Law of God, which is in accordance with Titus 2:11-13. Likewise, in Philippians 2:12, it says to work out our salvation with fear and trembling.
The Hebrew word “yada” refers to intimate relationships/knowledge gained by experience, such as with Genesis 4:1 where Adam knew (yada) Eve, she conceived, and gave birth to Cain. God’s way is the way to know (yada) Him and Jesus by experiencing being in His likeness through embodying His character traits, which is the narrow way to eternal life (John 17:3). For example, in Genesis 18:19, God knew (yada) Abraham that he would teach his children and those of His household to walk in His way by being doers of righteousness and justice that the Lord might bring to him all that He has promised. In Exodus 33:13, Moses wanted God to be gracious to him by teaching him to walk in His way that he and Israel might know (yada) Him, and in Matthew 7:23, Jesus said that he would tell those who are workers of lawlessness to depart from him because he never knew them, so the goal of the law is to graciously teach using how to experiencing having an intimate relationship with God and Jesus by walking in His way, which is His gift of eternal life.
In Luke 10:25-28, Jesus said affirmed that the way to inherit eternal life is by obeying the greatest two commandments, and something that we inherit is a gift, so he was speaking about what is intrinsically required in order to experience the gift of eternal life, not about the way to be good enough to earn it as the result.
I said "Obedience to the Law of God has absolutely nothing to with having a good enough performance" and it is you who is trying to redefine that as "remaining obedient enough to stay plugged in".
It does not say that grace saves those who are already saved, but rather it describes our salvation as being trained by grace to do those works. It does not follow that if training is salvation then salvation is a lifelong proceed of performance. In Titus 3:5, is speaking against becoming saved as the result of our works, not against our salvation involving us being trained by grace to do works. Again, I gave an example of how a gift can intrinsically require us to do works in order to experience it, but where doing those works has nothing to do with contributing enough towards earning the gift.
in 1 John 3:4-10, those who are not doers of righteous works in obedience to the Law of God are not children of God, and in Romans 8:4-7, Paul contrasted those who are born of the Spirit with those who have minds set on the flesh who are enemies of God who are refuse to submit to being doers of the Law of God, so regeneration and renewal are nothing things that happen independently from the experience of being a doer of the Law of God.
Being made to be doers of lawfulness is intrinsically part of the concept of being saved from being doers of lawlessness. We can't earn our righteousness even as the result of having perfect obedience to the Law of God because it was never given as a way of doing that in the first place (Romans 4:1-5), but it is also true that only the doers of the law will be justified (Romans 2:13), so there is a reason why our righteousness requires us to choose to be doers of the law other than having a good enough performance in order to earn it as the result, namely faith insofar as the faith by which we are declared righteous apart from those works also upholds the Law of God (Romans 3:28-31).
Again, I agree that the vine gives life and that the branch does not sustain it and I have not suggested otherwise. Jesus said that every branch in him that does not bear fruit he takes away and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes that I may bear more fruit. Jesus said that whoever abides in him and he in them, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from him we can do nothing and that if anyone does not abide in him he is thrown away like a branch that withers. Jesus said that if we keep his commandments we will abide in his love just as he kept his Father's commandments and abide in his love.
Those who hear and and believe the Gospel are the same as those who obey the Law (Matthew 4:15-23), so that is in accordance with Paul's position.
You keep trying to treat obedience as if it is extrinsic to salvation when it is intrinsic to it. Obedience does not preserve salvation, but rather it is intrinsically salvation from disobedience. The Spirit has the role of leading us to obey the Law of God (Ezekiel 36:26-27).
Again, salvation does not rest on our performance and that is not my system, so you are burning a straw man.
Redefining terms doesn't resolve the conflict, it just hides it.
Titus 2 describes what grace teaches believers after salvation. Titus 3 describes how God saved us apart from works. Those are 2 different categories. You merge them into one.
Regeneration is a birth, not a behavior. You merge them into one.
Paul says justification is apart from works (Rom 3:28) & that no one is justified by doing the Law (Rom 3:20). You merge justification & law‑keeping into one.
Paul defines ""in Christ"" as those who heard & believed the gospel (Eph 1:13). You redefine ""in Christ"" as ""those who obey the Law,"" merging position & performance into one.
Paul says the Holy Spirit is the seal & guarantee of our inheritance (Eph 1:13–14). You redefine obedience as ""intrinsic to salvation,"" merging preservation & performance into one.
In every case, the apostolic distinctions are clear. In every case, your system collapses those distinctions.
And that's the core issue: If salvation is ""the experience of doing the Law,"" then salvation is a lifelong performance.
If eternal life depends on continued obedience, then eternal life is only as eternal as our obedience.
If God's guarantee depends on us, then it was never God's guarantee.
The apostles preach: Grace > Faith > Salvation > Obedience.
Your system requires: Obedience > Participation > Retention > Salvation.
You can say ""that's not my system,"" but the order you present & defend is exactly that.
Upvote
0