Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Trump knew Epstein was trafficking and abusing children before he was under investigation in 2006. If it were you, would you have reported Epstein as soon as you knew this, or would you wait until he was under investigation to say something about it like Trump did?
I see you're focused on only one thing, so I'm going to try expanding your viewpoint on how well-known Epstein's crimes were, including by the authorities:
I responded to someone who falsely claimed that Trump made the first phone calls to the police. That is why I'm focused on Trump. It doesn't matter how many people knew what Epstein was doing. Trump knew he was sexually abusing and trafficking children before the authorities did but said nothing. That's why I asked you what you would do if you knew someone was doing what Epstein was doing. It was a simple question.
And what about the billion other elite people who were involved with Epstein or knew what he was doing and didn't blow the whistle?
None of them are the President of the United States, but don't you think someone should have reported him to the authorities? Shouldn't Trump have reported him at the time? If everyone in your neighborhood, including yourself, knew that the guy living next to you was sexually abusing and trafficking children, would you report him to the police, or would you just ignore his crimes like the rest of your neighbors?
To address your concerns, yes I would do that. As you can see in the article I pointed out to you, many people made phone calls reporting Epstein. Some were acted upon, and others weren't. Focusing on what Trump did or did not do is hardly worthy of doing unless protecting victims and getting justice for them is really not the goal of people who focus only on what Trump did or did not do.
Hey! Once again, he WAS reported. Read the article I showed you and learn that.
That's good to hear.
Yes, I know he was eventually reported, but before that, too many people, including Trump, chose to look the other way for many years before he was. Trump knew Epstein was sexually abusing and trafficking children before there was an investigation but did not report him. Failing to report someone who is sexually abusing children and trafficking them to others is unacceptable. Period.
I hope that you lump in the Democratic Party politicians whom failed to do anything about Epstein for many years.
Every DOJ has been protecting them going back 20 years.
Releasing victims names was probably an accident.
I read that 350 million pages have been released.
The whole thing for some people is only about the downfall of Trump. And supposedly somewhere there's a 20 year old sheet of paper several AGs and DOJs have seen which will accomplish that.
Why does everything have to have Republican and Democrat “sides”?
Not a question one not in authority can answer. In part some may not be charged due to the statute of limitations, others for lack of evidence or due to no witnesses. Your question is best answered by the Attorney General. The files, in the US legal system are not primary evidence but in most cases hearsay I think.
That's been exactly my point all this time. But someone here seems to want to make sure to focus on Trump concerning the whole thing.
I guess that explains why they didn't bother to interview victims
Because Trump is in charge NOW.
Or you could wait for three more years in hopes that a Democrat becomes president, and then you can blame him for Epstein's behavior.
I tried blaming Trump for his own behaviours but you guys don't like that either.
Not sure what your question is, but in three years there's a chance a democrat could be president and take the blame for Epstein simply because that person would be the one in power at that time.
It is almost as if he doesn't realize that Pam Bondi is not the only prosecutor in the United States. The information is out to the public, so why hasn't any other AG done anything?
