US Notches One of Its Biggest Annual Trade Gaps Since 1960; Trade deficits for goods hits a record high.

essentialsaltes · Thursday at 10:36 AM

The US trade deficit widened in December to $70.3 billion, resulting in a full-year deficit of $901.5 billion.
The December deficit reflected a 3.6% increase in the value of imports and a 1.7% decline in exports of goods and services.
The trade data were notably volatile in 2025 due to US importers reacting to tariff announcements from President Donald Trump.

[The trade deficit in 2024 was $903.5 billion, so the 2025 figure represents a reduction of 0.2% and is third worst ever.]

The trade data were notably volatile in 2025 from month to month as US importers reacted to a persistent drumbeat of tariff announcements from President Donald Trump. Gold and pharmaceutical imports were particularly choppy as companies raced to beat higher duties.

By country, the shortfall with China narrowed sharply — reaching about $202 billion, the smallest in more than 20 years and a reflection of the higher tariffs Trump put on Chinese imports. Trade has instead been largely rerouted through other countries like Mexico and Vietnam, where deficits widened to respective records.

Link#2:

And the U.S. deficit in the trade of goods widened 2% to a record $1.24 trillion last year as American companies boosted imports of computer chips and other tech goods from Taiwan to support massive investments in artificial intelligence.

The goods gap with Taiwan doubled to $147 billion and shot up 44%, to $178 billion, with Vietnam.

Larniavc · Thursday at 11:10 AM

You mean tariffs are working stupendously well?

essentialsaltes · Thursday at 11:14 AM

Larniavc said:
You mean tariffs are working stupendously well?

The tariff-taxes on US citizens have never been higher!

Tuur · Thursday at 5:55 PM

essentialsaltes said:
The US trade deficit widened in December to $70.3 billion, resulting in a full-year deficit of $901.5 billion.

The December deficit reflected a 3.6% increase in the value of imports and a 1.7% decline in exports of goods and services.

The trade data were notably volatile in 2025 due to US importers reacting to tariff announcements from President Donald Trump.

[The trade deficit in 2024 was $903.5 billion, so the 2025 figure represents a reduction of 0.2% and is third worst ever.]

The trade data were notably volatile in 2025 from month to month as US importers reacted to a persistent drumbeat of tariff announcements from President Donald Trump. Gold and pharmaceutical imports were particularly choppy as companies raced to beat higher duties.

By country, the shortfall with China narrowed sharply — reaching about $202 billion, the smallest in more than 20 years and a reflection of the higher tariffs Trump put on Chinese imports. Trade has instead been largely rerouted through other countries like Mexico and Vietnam, where deficits widened to respective records.

Link#2:

And the U.S. deficit in the trade of goods widened 2% to a record $1.24 trillion last year as American companies boosted imports of computer chips and other tech goods from Taiwan to support massive investments in artificial intelligence.

The goods gap with Taiwan doubled to $147 billion and shot up 44%, to $178 billion, with Vietnam.

Let's look at it:

essentialsaltes · Thursday at 6:47 PM

Tuur said:
Let's look at it:

Right, Trump's tariff talk drove people to overstock items, and then they didn't have to buy them when the tariffs were enacted on Liberation Day. But the stock will run out. Will US producers have found US suppliers for those items? We'll find out soon, but the chip business is not going to be solved in a year or two.

Richard T · Thursday at 11:06 PM

To be fair, it takes America a long time to reshore manufacturing. Especially when the Supreme Court has not weighed in one whether the tariffs were legal or not. The good news is that the U.S. dependence on China is waning. The full effects of the dollars weakness and tariffs will start to help the deficit issues in the long run assuming the tariffs are legal and lasting. (though I hope most are not).

Pommer · Thursday at 11:59 PM

Re: SCOTUS will punt.
The High Court is not going to want to weigh in on a squabble betwixt the other Two Branches, if it can reasonably avoid it.
If Congress, by its inaction cedes it’s “power of the purse” (for a time, without actually passing a Laws saying “Here, Mr President, the Congress allows you to set tariffs in our stead, for [certain but not unlimited time])”, then the Court won’t want to interfere with “what’s working”. Trump wins. The system will have “worked”. Amazing, ain’t it?

Richard T · 2026-02-20T04:36:11-0600

Pommer said:
Re: SCOTUS will punt.
The High Court is not going to want to weigh in on a squabble betwixt the other Two Branches, if it can reasonably avoid it.
If Congress, by its inaction cedes it’s “power of the purse” (for a time, without actually passing a Laws saying “Here, Mr President, the Congress allows you to set tariffs in our stead, for [certain but not unlimited time])”, then the Court won’t want to interfere with “what’s working”. Trump wins. The system will have “worked”. Amazing, ain’t it?

Your basically saying Congress has to opt in to restrain the President. Sorry but the President is restrained by the Constitution. If Congress is derelict, the President should not have the power to take over and create a large tax increase through tariffs. Anyway, it will be interesting. Friday is often the day for court releases. So we might see a ruling later today.

Pommer · 2026-02-20T12:54:23-0600

Richard T said:
Your basically saying Congress has to opt in to restrain the President. Sorry but the President is restrained by the Constitution. If Congress is derelict, the President should not have the power to take over and create a large tax increase through tariffs. Anyway, it will be interesting. Friday is often the day for court releases. So we might see a ruling later today.

Well, I was w, wr…incorrect !
President Trump incorrectly applied the Law (granting a President of extraordinary authority over import/exports and tariffs).
Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh thought everything was kosher, apparently.

Richard T · 2026-02-20T18:26:03-0600

Pommer said:
Well, I was w, wr…incorrect !
President Trump incorrectly applied the Law (granting a President of extraordinary authority over import/exports and tariffs).
Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh thought everything was kosher, apparently.

You were not alone in thinking Trump would win this. The court is too political, you can never tell. But I'm glad the executive branch has limited powers. When you have deficits for over 50 years in a row what exactly is the emergency? Also to raise Canada's tariff on a personal whim? No emergency in that either. The sad part is all the wasted diplomacy. If Congress does not want to pass tariffs, why would a President even bother? But it justified keeping the tax cuts which is a pretty big win for Trump and the GOP at least for this term.

hedrick · 2026-02-20T18:40:24-0600

Richard T said:
You were not alone in thinking Trump would win this. The court is too political, you can never tell. But I'm glad the executive branch has limited powers. When you have deficits for over 50 years in a row what exactly is the emergency? Also to raise Canada's tariff on a personal whim? No emergency in that either. The sad part is all the wasted diplomacy. If Congress does not want to pass tariffs, why would a President even bother? But it justified keeping the tax cuts which is a pretty big win for Trump and the GOP at least for this term.

There are several laws giving the president discretion. He can just move to claiming national security interests, or unfair trading.

Richard T · 2026-02-20T18:55:32-0600

hedrick said:
There are several laws giving the president discretion. He can just move to claiming national security interests, or unfair trading.

Yes, Trump can keep the game going. Midterms are near though and I think maga momentum turned some time ago. It is starting to show up in the economy as well. Too bad there are no plans for what America really needs, to fix the budget, social security, higher ed, and medical costs.

hedrick · 2026-02-20T19:30:05-0600

Richard T said:
Yes, Trump can keep the game going. Midterms are near though and I think maga momentum turned some time ago. It is starting to show up in the economy as well. Too bad there are no plans for what America really needs, to fix the budget, social security, higher ed, and medical costs.

Yes.Neither party seems to have a plan. But at least we can get someone who won’t keep making things worse.

Pommer · 2026-02-21T00:09:49-0600

Richard T said:
You were not alone in thinking Trump would win this. The court is too political, you can never tell. But I'm glad the executive branch has limited powers. When you have deficits for over 50 years in a row what exactly is the emergency? Also to raise Canada's tariff on a personal whim? No emergency in that either. The sad part is all the wasted diplomacy. If Congress does not want to pass tariffs, why would a President even bother? But it justified keeping the tax cuts which is a pretty big win for Trump and the GOP at least for this term.

Trump knocks down stuff to rebuild better. (That’s the crux of his whole schtick), he’s political Knute Rockne and Vince Lombardi, no wonder they love him.
History will record him him as good as Hoover, who also preceded a progressive go-getter!
We’ll be in great shape by 2033.

Pommer · 2026-02-21T00:11:42-0600

hedrick said:
There are several laws giving the president discretion. He can just move to claiming national security interests, or unfair trading.

Yes, he’s got “moves” but there’s “strings” like 150 days limit before Congress has to weigh in, officially.

Pommer · 2026-02-21T00:14:24-0600

Richard T said:
Yes, Trump can keep the game going. Midterms are near though and I think maga momentum turned some time ago. It is starting to show up in the economy as well. Too bad there are no plans for what America really needs, to fix the budget, social security, higher ed, and medical costs.

hedrick said:
Yes.Neither party seems to have a plan. But at least we can get someone who won’t keep making things worse.

All of this requires “governing”, which is not President Trump’s longsuit, he likes being boss, he “rules”.

Richard T · 2026-02-21T12:43:36-0600

Pommer said:
Trump knocks down stuff to rebuild better. (That’s the crux of his whole schtick), he’s political Knute Rockne and Vince Lombardi, no wonder they love him.
History will record him him as good as Hoover, who also preceded a progressive go-getter!
We’ll be in great shape by 2033.

Does he knock it down to rebuild better or just to find a way to work in a personal advantage? Even if I said rebuild better the focus is on helping those who assist and promote Trump.

hedrick · 2026-02-21T13:40:42-0600

Pommer said:
Yes, he’s got “moves” but there’s “strings” like 150 days limit before Congress has to weigh in, officially.

I assume at 150 days he will declare a different emergency. I don’t see Trump ever acknowledging that there are things he isn’t authorized to do.

Aryeh Jay · 2026-02-21T13:54:52-0600

hedrick said:
I assume at 150 days he will declare a different emergency. I don’t see Trump ever acknowledging that there are things he isn’t authorized to do.

I predict the Iran war will fit that bill.

We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

US Notches One of Its Biggest Annual Trade Gaps Since 1960; Trade deficits for goods hits a record high.

Fact-Based Lifeform

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"

Fact-Based Lifeform

Well-Known Member

Fact-Based Lifeform

Well-Known Member

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic

Well-Known Member

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

Stuck on a ship.

Similar threads