Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A good, oh, let’s say, 42%, yes. 48% in a good year.
Most of what we fight about is made-up nonsense to keep us busy sniping at one another. We’re allowed to quit at any time. That was always allowed. You quit first, then I will.
Or I can quit first?
There’s a lot of dross to sift through, yes. This has always been the case, whether on these forums or internet relay chat or the newsgroups and in newspapers before all of that.
Right but it works great for them what’s got the power now, this is why power is coveted.
This is a constitutional and commonsense security measure. Over 80% of Americans agree with Voter-ID laws. If you have to show ID in order to buy alcohol or rent a car, you should have to show ID in order to vote.
Jim Banks Calls for Passage of SAVE America Act to Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote
Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN), an original sponsor of the SAVE America Act, called for the passage of the legislation to require proof of citizenship to register to vote and mandate photo ID at the ballot box.www.breitbart.com
People also have to show ID to get on an airplane or to receive government benefits. It is time.
View attachment 376644
1) Will the "SAVE AMERICA ACT" prevent President Trump, in the future, from pressuring Secretaries of State responsible for administrating federal and state elections to "adjust" their total vote count to "find" him with enough votes to provide him with a majority?
2) Will the "SAVE AMERICA ACT" prevent President Trump, in the future, from requesting Republican governors, as was the case of Texas, to "gerrymander" federal congressional boundaries in their state which would in turn allow the GOP to retain its majority in the House! - irrespective of the popular vote?
3) Having reviewed past federal elections, the Brennan Center reported that verifiable incidents of voter fraud varied from a mere 0.0003% to 0.0025% - isolated cases rendering it as an impractical method of actually influencing the outcome of elections!
4) Real election fraud is actually being perpetrated by the politicians themselves, including the same political party as the House members who are currently introducing legislation like the "SAVE AMERICA ACT"- meanwhile actively participating in the "gerrymandering" of congressional boundaries!
5) "Gerrymandering"-is the only effective method of manipulating the vote on a scale that can influence the outcome of an election - a means of rewarding political parties having a minority in the popular vote with the majority of electoral seats!
Debunking the Voter Fraud Myth
The president has continued to claim voter fraud was a problem in the 2016 election. A look at the facts makes clear fraud is rare, and does not happen on a scale even close to necessary to “rig” an election.www.brennancenter.org
1) As much as prosecutors and judges love to go after Trump, such as making up ridiculous valuations of Mar-a-lago and faking photos of classified document covers on the floor, no one brought up charges for Trump asking about finding votes. That's because Trump clearly believed vote counts had been altered and he, like other candidates, was perfectly within his rights to ask to look for uncounted votes.View attachment 376644
1) Will the "SAVE AMERICA ACT" prevent President Trump, in the future, from pressuring Secretaries of State responsible for administrating federal and state elections to "adjust" their total vote count to "find" him with enough votes to provide him with a majority?
2) Will the "SAVE AMERICA ACT" prevent President Trump, in the future, from requesting Republican governors, as was the case of Texas, to "gerrymander" federal congressional boundaries in their state which would in turn allow the GOP to retain its majority in the House! - irrespective of the popular vote?
3) Having reviewed past federal elections, the Brennan Center reported that verifiable incidents of voter fraud varied from a mere 0.0003% to 0.0025% - isolated cases rendering it as an impractical method of actually influencing the outcome of elections!
4) Real election fraud is actually being perpetrated by the politicians themselves, including the same political party as the House members who are currently introducing legislation like the "SAVE AMERICA ACT"- meanwhile actively participating in the "gerrymandering" of congressional boundaries!
5) "Gerrymandering"-is the only effective method of manipulating the vote on a scale that can influence the outcome of an election - a means of rewarding political parties having a minority in the popular vote with the majority of electoral seats!
Debunking the Voter Fraud Myth
The president has continued to claim voter fraud was a problem in the 2016 election. A look at the facts makes clear fraud is rare, and does not happen on a scale even close to necessary to “rig” an election.
Fraud convictions very few, but there was serious wrongdoing in swing states like Georgia and Michigan. In Georgia numerous lies were certainly told. In Michigan Republican observers were often stopped from properly observing, in Detroit every time they removed a Republican observer (which happened over and over) Democrat elections workers cheered. As much government wrongdoing as I have encountered in my lifetime I was still taken aback by what happened in Detroit, I just hadn't imagined it would take place in our country. No one knows how much total wrongdoing there was or if it would have changed the result. Trump is entitled to his opinion.
Whatever anyone's opinion, more attention was brought to the weaknesses in our election system. Security is a good thing. Last election Lara Trump organized over one hundred thousand observers and workers. Lack of voter ID is still a weakness, so is some absence of chain of custody and computers.
