Another look at the moon landing.

Jerry N. · Sunday at 11:38 AM

Hentenza said:
You sure know how to pick your sources.

RadarOnline – Bias and Credibility

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are notconsidered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source.

RadarOnline - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Again from AI cause I still feel lazy today.

As of early 2026, Apollo 11 moonwalker Buzz Aldrin, 96, is navigating declining health and grieving the loss of his wife, Anca Faur, in 2025. Despite alarming reports from a friend regarding his care, his family stated they are actively ensuring his well-being, including planning a move closer to them in Southern California.

Health and Personal Life: Turning 96 on January 20, 2026, Aldrin is the oldest living astronaut, noted as dealing with declining health in late 2025. He continues to mourn the 2025 passing of his wife, Anca Faur.

Family and Living Situation: Reports surfaced in December 2025 from a friend alleging Aldrin was isolated in Los Angeles. However, the Aldrin Family Foundation stated his children are supporting him, having spent the 2025 holidays with him.

Recent Status: He is transitioning to a new home in Southern California to be closer to family to ensure he receives the best care.

His family stated in late December 2025 that he was enjoying time with them and looking forward to his new living situation, contradicting claims of abandonment.

Glad to hear it.

Apple Sky · Sunday at 11:38 AM

Hentenza said:
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are notconsidered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source.

Well I didn't know this.

Jerry N. · Sunday at 11:47 AM

Apple Sky said:
Well I didn't know this.

I'm not surprised. I didn't think to check it either.

Apple Sky · Sunday at 12:41 PM

The Van Allen Radiation Belts which would STOP AND KILL any human being in ANY ship that has metal on it from reaching to anywhere close to earth's moon...the actual scientific and logical data indicate that the moon landings were a big colossal and despicable hoax, and that humans are stuck on the earth or in low-earth orbit, and could never reach the moon safely or alive, if at all.

evidence the moon landings were fake

prodromos · Sunday at 12:43 PM

d taylor said:
Why use a translation of Job 26:7 that has no Biblical support.

He hangs the earth upon blimah

You should use the sun "rising" and "setting" to similarly constrain your understanding of other verses.

prodromos · Sunday at 12:46 PM

Apple Sky said:
The Van Allen Radiation Belts which would STOP AND KILL any human being in ANY ship that has metal on it from reaching to anywhere close to earth's moon...the actual scientific and logical data indicate that the moon landings were a big colossal and despicable hoax, and that humans are stuck on the earth or in low-earth orbit, and could never reach the moon safely or alive, if at all.

evidence the moon landings were fake

The astronauts passage through the weakest parts of the Van Allen belts has been explained to you multiple times, but like a dog returning to its vomit you keep posting the same false nonsense.

Hentenza · Sunday at 12:47 PM

Jerry N. said:
I'm not surprised. I didn't think to check it either.

Apple Sky said:
Well I didn't know this.

I have experience with RadarOnline gutter press. It’s nothing but a rag. You can’t believe anything they say.

Hentenza · Sunday at 12:50 PM

Apple Sky said:
The Van Allen Radiation Belts which would STOP AND KILL any human being in ANY ship that has metal on it from reaching to anywhere close to earth's moon..

Not true. This has been debunked many times across the treads

Apple Sky said:
.the actual scientific and logical data indicate that the moon landings were a big colossal and despicable hoax,

No. The scientific and logical data reinforce the fact of the lunar landings.

Apple Sky said:
and that humans are stuck on the earth or in low-earth orbit, and could never reach the moon safely or alive, if at all.

Humans already have gone to outer space. Not to mention all of the orbiters and probes that we have sent to the different planets.

Apple Sky said:
evidence the moon landings were fake

Bunk.

Jerry N. · Sunday at 12:51 PM

Apple Sky said:
The Van Allen Radiation Belts which would STOP AND KILL any human being in ANY ship that has metal on it from reaching to anywhere close to earth's moon...the actual scientific and logical data indicate that the moon landings were a big colossal and despicable hoax, and that humans are stuck on the earth or in low-earth orbit, and could never reach the moon safely or alive, if at all.

evidence the moon landings were fake

First of all, if you have Van Allen Radiation Belts the earth is a globe. They are called belts because they are bands of radiation around the earth. There are places where they don’t exists or are very weak. The trick is to fly through the weak areas or where it doesn’t exists. However, it is in constant flux, so the timing has to be perfect. NASA figured it out pretty well, so astronauts have lived to be 95.

Apple Sky · Sunday at 1:23 PM

Jerry N. said:
The trick is to fly through the weak areas or where it doesn’t exists. However, it is in constant flux, so the timing has to be perfect. NASA figured it out pretty well, so astronauts have lived to be 95.

Sure they did -I can just imagine what would happen if they hadn't got their timing right.

Jerry N. · Sunday at 1:27 PM

Apple Sky said:
Sure they did -I can just imagine what would happen if they hadn't got their timing right.

View attachment 376552

But it still requires a spherical earth.

Hentenza · Sunday at 1:42 PM

Apple Sky said:
Sure they did -I can just imagine what would happen if they hadn't got their timing right.

View attachment 376552

Here I am full of AI today.

4

How NASA Worked Around Earth's Radiation Belts to Land Apollo ...

Astronauts passed through the Van Allen radiation belts quickly, spending less than two hours (roughly 68 minutes) in the region, which kept their radiation exposure well within safe limits. NASA minimized risk by choosing trajectories that navigated through the thinner, less intense parts of the belts and utilized the aluminum hull of the spacecraft for shielding.
Key Strategies for Safe Passage:

Speed: The Apollo spacecraft traveled at high speed to minimize the time spent within the high-radiation zones.
Trajectory Planning: NASA plotted a course that bypassed the most intense inner regions of the belts.
Shielding: The aluminum hull of the Apollo Command and Service Module provided sufficient protection against the charged particles in the belts, which are not as penetrating as X-rays.
Timing: The trajectory was calculated to pass through the belts quickly, resulting in a low, non-lethal total dose of radiation (around 16 RADs).

The Van Allen belts are not a lethal, impassable barrier, and the radiation risk was considered manageable for a short-duration, high-speed transit.

Apple Sky · Sunday at 1:45 PM

A lovely song.

Apple Sky · Sunday at 1:54 PM

Hentenza said:
The Van Allen belts are not a lethal, impassable barrier, and the radiation risk was considered manageable for a short-duration, high-speed transit.

Of course they're not.

Strong in Him · Sunday at 2:02 PM

Apple Sky said:
Sure they did -I can just imagine what would happen if they hadn't got their timing right.

???

First you say, "sure they did", meaning that you don't believe the explanation that was given - i.e. didn't happen.
Then you indicate what would have happened if they hadn't got their timings right - i.e. if they had missed the weakest part of the Van Allen belts.
This is a contradiction.

And as you don't believe anyone ever went to the moon anyway, the problem of crossing the Van Allen belts is irrelevant.

Hentenza · Sunday at 3:01 PM

Apple Sky said:
Of course they're not.

The astronauts already passed through the van allen belt so………

ETA: The following crewed missions with a total of 25 unique astronauts made it through the van Allen belt, Apollo 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17.

prodromos · Sunday at 5:12 PM

Apple Sky said:
Of course they're not.

Like a dog returning to its vomit.

d taylor · Sunday at 10:49 PM

-

Why have they waited so long to fake going back to the moon and also to go to mars. They were waiting on this technology to be developed, so it can be used in the deception.

prodromos · 2026-02-16T00:00:41-0600

d taylor said:
Why have they waited so long to fake going back to the moon and also to go to mars. They were waiting on this technology to be developed, so it can be used in the deception.

Since you don't believe anyone can actually go to the Moon or Mars, why would they need fake humans? It's not as if they are going anywhere dangerous according to your fantasy, just some film studio or a desert location.

Apple Sky · 2026-02-16T00:01:13-0600

d taylor said:
-

Why have they waited so long to fake going back to the moon and also to go to mars. They were waiting on this technology to be developed, so it can be used in the deception.

These are so realistic, what do they intend to do with them ?

We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Another look at the moon landing.

Well-Known Member

You sure know how to pick your sources. ​

​

RadarOnline – Bias and Credibility​

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald

Well-Known Member

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald

evidence the moon landings were fake​

Senior Veteran

Senior Veteran

evidence the moon landings were fake​

I will fear no evil for You are with me

I will fear no evil for You are with me

evidence the moon landings were fake​

Well-Known Member

evidence the moon landings were fake​

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald

Well-Known Member

I will fear no evil for You are with me

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald

Great is thy faithfulness

I will fear no evil for You are with me

Senior Veteran

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

In Sight Like Unto An Emerald

Similar threads

You sure know how to pick your sources.

RadarOnline – Bias and Credibility

evidence the moon landings were fake

evidence the moon landings were fake

evidence the moon landings were fake

evidence the moon landings were fake