- Apr 30, 2013
- 33,964
- 21,054
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- United Ch. of Christ
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Our church council has started bringing up discussion at coffee hour the fact we'll probably have to sell off most, or all of our property as our church downsizes. They consider building a smaller church on a subplot of the land, perhaps a small chapel, and/or temporarily meeting in a rented apartment building or food pantry.
I raised some pointed questions and it felt like my concerns got partly rebuffed. I'm concerned that the church council is taking advice from the convention without doing its own research. The convention, the denomination, wants the church to remain open, even though I pointed out long-term demographics in the area are not favorable. I talked about merging with the Disciples of Christ or a similar church in the area. That really seemed to trigger some people on the insistence that the congregation would remain in the UCC. The president of the council said this was a temporary 25-year plan, and they were aware of the demographics of the area. So I wonder what the denominational leadership thinks we are signing up for exactly, spiritual hospice? What is the point of selling a church, hoping to rebuild a new one, and seeing the dynamics repeat all over again of decline and barely affording to keep the lights on ?
I understand people are really attached to legacy, but I'm not sure the UCC denominational leadership isn't at least part of the problem, and I personally don't relish giving hospice care to a church in a spiritual holding pattern in the last chapter of my life. I don't feel it fits my vocation, I'm tempted to say "I didn't cause the problem, you clean up your own mess. "God is still speaking" may not be just a slogan, but the problem is you aren't listening." All the national campaigns they have offered to try to revitalize the national brand have failed, and the only growing UCC congregations seem to focus on taking a direction different from the denominational leadership and responding to local community spiritual needs, using UCC materials as needed but engaging in their own process of discernment.
I raised some pointed questions and it felt like my concerns got partly rebuffed. I'm concerned that the church council is taking advice from the convention without doing its own research. The convention, the denomination, wants the church to remain open, even though I pointed out long-term demographics in the area are not favorable. I talked about merging with the Disciples of Christ or a similar church in the area. That really seemed to trigger some people on the insistence that the congregation would remain in the UCC. The president of the council said this was a temporary 25-year plan, and they were aware of the demographics of the area. So I wonder what the denominational leadership thinks we are signing up for exactly, spiritual hospice? What is the point of selling a church, hoping to rebuild a new one, and seeing the dynamics repeat all over again of decline and barely affording to keep the lights on ?
I understand people are really attached to legacy, but I'm not sure the UCC denominational leadership isn't at least part of the problem, and I personally don't relish giving hospice care to a church in a spiritual holding pattern in the last chapter of my life. I don't feel it fits my vocation, I'm tempted to say "I didn't cause the problem, you clean up your own mess. "God is still speaking" may not be just a slogan, but the problem is you aren't listening." All the national campaigns they have offered to try to revitalize the national brand have failed, and the only growing UCC congregations seem to focus on taking a direction different from the denominational leadership and responding to local community spiritual needs, using UCC materials as needed but engaging in their own process of discernment.
Last edited: