- Oct 2, 2020
- 30,694
- 16,372
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
I don't think there's any mere about empathy. I think it has the potential to draw someone in on a deeply personal level. Your pain is my pian. Your anger is my anger. Your desire is my desire, and so on.I can very well understand what you're saying, but I don't think being empathetic to the pain that other people have requires anyone to be 'drawn' into someone else's world, and I don't think naturally having empathy specifically implies that one will become so absorbed. At the same time, I will continue to advocate for Christian compassion as being over and above mere empathy.
Well of course the narcissist is just one of many examples. Narcissist can be replaced with a multitude of other types of people. Or causes for that matter.That could be the case, and I understand that some folks out there have had to deal with narcissist. However, my background in dealing with the mental and emotional problems of others comes from a different experience set than that of the one you're referring to here, and out of that past experience I've had to learn some things about neuroscience that I put up front and center.
Well as I recall the word only recently became controversial. At least to the level it's now reached. And it seems a foregone conclusion the reason for that is because a particular spin has been put on it.Perhaps, but I only see empathy becoming 'toxic' when the usual denotation of that term is changed and there also exists an accompanying demand for conformity to that new usage of the term. As a philosopher, I will simply decline the new usage if I don't think it has any evidence to support it.
Upvote
0