There is no time limit for the Four Seals. Wars kill far more by 'collateral damage', that in actual battle.
My proof is that you have no proof for the incredible and impossible idea of a rapture to heaven.
The concept of the **rapture**—believers being "caught up" to meet the Lord in the air, based on 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17—appears in early Christian writings, but the modern understanding (especially the **pre-tribulation rapture**, where the church is removed before a distinct seven-year tribulation period) is debated among scholars.
All early church fathers who discussed eschatology (end times) affirmed the biblical event of believers being caught up or transformed at Christ's return. However, the majority expected this to occur **after** or **during** a period of tribulation/persecution, often linked to the visible second coming of Christ, rather than a secret pre-tribulation escape for the church alone.
### Key Figures and Teachings
- **Irenaeus of Lyons** (c. 130–202 AD), a disciple of Polycarp (who knew the Apostle John): He frequently referenced believers being "caught up" or translated (e.g., drawing parallels to Enoch and Elijah in *Against Heresies*). Some pre-tribulation advocates interpret passages like *Against Heresies* 5.29.1 ("the Church shall be suddenly caught up from this... There shall be tribulation...") as implying removal before tribulation. However, the broader context (including references to the "last contest of the righteous" and enduring the Antichrist) shows he expected the church to face tribulation before being caught up at Christ's return. Most scholars conclude he did not teach a pre-tribulation rapture.
- **Pseudo-Ephraem** (or Ephraem the Syrian, though the key text is likely later, 4th–7th century): A sermon attributed to him ("On the Last Times, the Antichrist, and the End of the World") states something like: "For all the saints and elect of God are gathered, prior to the tribulation that is to come, and are taken to the Lord lest they see the confusion..." This is one of the clearest early references to a gathering **before** tribulation, and pre-tribulation proponents cite it strongly. Authorship and dating are disputed (not definitively the historical Ephraem the Syrian, d. 373 AD), but it represents an ancient expression of pre-trib ideas.
Other early writers (e.g., Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, the Didache, Barnabas, Shepherd of Hermas) emphasized the **imminent** return of Christ and sometimes escaping tribulation through faith, but in a general sense tied to perseverance amid persecution, not a separate pre-trib event.
### Broader Consensus
- The early church was largely **premillennial** (expecting a literal 1,000-year reign after Christ's return) and believed in a rapture/resurrection of believers.
- They did not articulate a systematic **pre-tribulation rapture** as popularized in the 19th century by figures like John Nelson Darby. Claims of widespread pre-trib teaching often rely on selective or out-of-context quotes.
- Many sources (including post-trib and amillennial perspectives) argue the rapture was always understood as post-tribulational or at Christ's visible return.
- Pretribulation advocates point to elements like imminency (any-moment return) in apostolic fathers and isolated phrases in Irenaeus or Pseudo-Ephraem as seeds of the doctrine.
In summary, early church fathers taught a "rapture" in the sense of believers meeting the Lord (per Scripture), but not typically the modern pre-tribulation version. The clearest potential pre-trib hint comes from Pseudo-Ephraem, while figures like Irenaeus align more with enduring tribulation before the catching up. Eschatological views varied, and the full dispensational framework (including a distinct pre-trib rapture) developed much later.