Extreme cost and difficulty of exploitation.With all the resources why would they depend on anyone for anything.
Everything Trump says and thinks about Greenland depends on climate change being real.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Extreme cost and difficulty of exploitation.With all the resources why would they depend on anyone for anything.
Some analysts point out that interest in Greenland is connected to changes happening in the Arctic. As the region warms, new shipping routes and resource access open up, which increases its strategic value. That’s the context behind the claim being made.Everything Trump says and thinks about Greenland depends on climate change being real.
I understand that.Some analysts point out that interest in Greenland is connected to changes happening in the Arctic. As the region warms, new shipping routes and resource access open up, which increases its strategic value. That’s the context behind the claim being made.
The GIUK Gap requires neither; likely the sea floor there is well mapped. And cryolite's been mine there since at least WWII and likely before. Greenland is a little larger than three and a third Texases, with about two and a half Texases of ice sheet. That's an area the third of Texas that's ice-free. That's an area of about 2/3 of Texas, or a little bit smaller than North Carolina.Extreme cost and difficulty of exploitation.
Everything Trump says and thinks about Greenland depends on climate change being real.
There's nothing new about the GIUK Gap. That has always been used by the Russians (as best they can). That's the route of their northern fleet into the Atlantic. Always has been. Nothing new or startling or suddenly threatening about that.The GIUK Gap requires neither; likely the sea floor there is well mapped. And cryolite's been mine there since at least WWII and likely before. Greenland is a little larger than three and a third Texases, with about two and a half Texases of ice sheet. That's an area the third of Texas that's ice-free. That's an area of about 2/3 of Texas, or a little bit smaller than North Carolina.
Are you claiming the Chinese are building an airport on Greenland?It was enough that the Chinese had some interest there, all without clearing away the ice sheet. Building an airport, too. Interesting thing, that.
Analysts don’t claim to know his private motives, but they usually point to a consistent public pattern. His style leans toward bold, attention‑grabbing ideas that signal disruption and challenge long‑standing norms. Supporters see that as shaking up a system they think is outdated, while critics interpret it differently. So instead of assuming a hidden motive, most analysis frames it as political messaging and brand‑building rather than a literal plan.If his real plan is to get control of Greenland for the economic advantage of his cronies, then it would make diabolical sense to convince his base that climate change is a hoax and stop all international efforts to prevent climate change.
Money and power for himself and his cronies.Analysts don’t claim to know his private motives,
It seems like the focus has shifted in the second term.Money and power for himself and his cronies.
Certainly there are Venezuelans happy to be rid of Maduro.
That doesn't mean at all even those Venezuelans want to be governed from Washington DC.
If some Greenlanders want to break away from Denmark, it does not mean at all they want to be controlled by Washington DC.
What people want is national liberty, not just another colonizing power.
He's got people keeping the focus on money and power.It seems like the focus has shifted in the second term.
About 2018 or so, China reps showed up in Greenland to discuss mining and building an airport. Denmark looked at Greenland and said “What are you doing?” And that ended that - for now. Bottom line whether or not China ever mines or builds an airport on Greenland is something Denmark controls, not the US. Denmark could just as easily change its mind. Just as we could easily lose monitoring of that portion of the GIUK gap.Are you claiming the Chinese are building an airport on Greenland?
So, it's your fantasy, then, that you're talking about as though it's a thing already done.About 2018 or so, China reps showed up in Greenland to discuss mining and building an airport. Denmark looked at Greenland and said “What are you doing?” And that ended that - for now. Bottom line whether or not China ever mines or builds an airport on Greenland is something Denmark controls, not the US. Denmark could just as easily change its mind. Just as we could easily lose monitoring of that portion of the GIUK gap.
I would think the main focus is simply the influence that comes with being part of a well‑known political family. People in many places naturally try to build relationships with families who have long-standing connections, because they believe it helps them navigate complicated government processes more easily. As for past administrations, there have been long-running public discussions about how political families use their networks, but the details and interpretations depend on which sources someone follows.He's got people keeping the focus on money and power.
Both Greenland and Alaska have Indigenous peoples who maintain distinct communities, cultures, and traditions, but the structure of those communities is not identical.The Greenlanders themselves admit that they still need outside subsidies.
lol wut? No, that is absolutely not what they do. Leaders at that level (in business or government) tend to be very careful about what they say in public because people will tease it apart and act on it.Trump just floats the idea to see how it will be accepted or rejected by the population of Greenland.
This is what business executives do when they want to get a feeling for an idea they have.
It's what CEO's of large businesses do, I've seen it. They need to know the market reaction before they make a decision. I fact,lol wut? No, that is absolutely not what they do. Leaders at that level (in business or government) tend to be very careful about what they say in public because people will tease it apart and act on it.
Trump never developed that skill because his business is privately held and not especially large (by corporate standards), so there weren't tens or hundreds of thousands of people hanging on his every word. He could just run his mouth without consequence.
It's what CEO's of large businesses do, I've seen it.
They need to know the market reaction before they make a decision. I fact,
many will order their marketing departments to survey their customers.
Trump was never a politician, but a businessman who's customers were in the public sphere. He is not polished
with his words like career politicians are.
To "...order their marketing departments to survey their customers" is on the other side of the planet from "... just floats the idea to see how it will be accepted or rejected by the population."It's what CEO's of large businesses do, I've seen it. They need to know the market reaction before they make a decision. I fact,
many will order their marketing departments to survey their customers.
Trump was never a politician, but a businessman who's customers were in the public sphere. He is not polished
with his words like career politicians are.
They like the way they're living now. They don't necessarily want their land ravaged by resource exploiters.With all the resources why would they depend on anyone for anything.
The places where I was employed, DEC, Quantum, etc.Oh? Which CEO's and in what circumstances?
Focus-group testing of ideas by the marketing department is not remotely similar to the CEO making public statements just to see how they fly.
Right, because, again, he didn't have that accountability - to voters or shareholders. He owned his business and could say whatever he wanted.