essentialsaltes
Fact-Based Lifeform
- Oct 17, 2011
- 45,749
- 48,566
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
That is not what a scientific theory is.No. But I don't dream up these wild fantasies
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That is not what a scientific theory is.No. But I don't dream up these wild fantasies
Why are you replying to yourself?You will get lots of hateful push back for even considering such a thing... but that is typical for new evidence that latter becomes accepted as fact or workable theory.
Gravity is the push back of the essence of the cosmos against matter or energy that displaces it. This is what forces these displacing agents into ether a typical spherical shape or a flattened outward radiating disk. Depending on the size and density of the mass is what factors in the amount of cosmic resistance (gravity).
What about cosmologists who are also Christians?But I don't dream up these wild fantasies that most atheist agnostic scientists imagine and purport them to be true... either.
Why are you replying to yourself?
Lol.Inference from incomplete evidence is different from guesswork.
A scientific theory is formed based on what evidence is available plus physics plus supposition while allowing for rebuttal or being disproved by gaining more evidence.That is not what a scientific theory is.
Just beating to the punch / avoiding the sound of crickets on your part.Why are you replying to yourself?
You mean people who can be Christian in faith but deceived about cosmology?What about cosmologists who are also Christians?
Prove it.This is a false claim.
So the Christians on this, a Christian website who are cosmologists , astrophysicists etc are not real Christians?You mean people who can be Christian in faith but deceived about cosmology?
Do you really want to go with this lame subterfuge?
A scientific theory is formed based on what evidence is available plus physics plus supposition while allowing for rebuttal or being disproved by gaining more evidence.
Not the diatribe drivel posing as science about diamond rain, water worlds gas giants in close orbit of stars, etc. using nonfactual artist renderings and made up videos and graphics claiming these poor impotent "theories" are facts. That is not science but false religion! And most are simply taking the word of these wild-eyed lunatics without verifying their ridiculous claims or even applying common sense.
Truly people are bleating sheep. Baaaa, so you say baaaa, so anoth says baaaa
The important thing in this context is that a theory must not only be a satisfactory explanation for the totality of the evidence, but there are no competing hypotheses that can match its explanatory power.A scientific theory
You mean people who can be Christian in faith but deceived about cosmology?
Do you really want to go with this lame subterfuge?
You need to substantiate this first.Prove it.
That's not how science works, though, is it?No. But I don't dream up these wild fantasies that most atheist agnostic scientists imagine and purport them to be true... either.
That's how science works.Try just the facts, people.
That's what science is about; sorting out what's objectively true from what people "know" but isn't true at all. Just like the "flat Earth" thing. People "know" that the earth is flat, when in fact it isn't, as a matter of faith. Science doesn't work that way.You know, the truth.
I know I got everything I needed to know to be an Electrical Engineer from the Bible. None of that "scientific" rubbish for me. <Laugh>"But that's the point. What it "knows about" is far less than what scientists think they know, speculate, imagine, fantasize about and then report these fairy tales as facts and science. ← Science fiction. Not science facts."
Tuere's that. but my brilliant technique for replying to meself is setting out to edit a message (mine always need it, too few get it), but hitting Reply instead of Edit.Though it is weird that people do that on this site in general. There's another poster who does it, where they start a thread and the first few comments are replies from themselves to their own OP in an effort to continue the thread. It's weird...
We can measure the orbits of stars rotating with the disk of our Galaxy.A scientific theory is formed based on what evidence is available plus physics plus supposition while allowing for rebuttal or being disproved by gaining more evidence.
Not the diatribe drivel posing as science about diamond rain, water worlds gas giants in close orbit of stars, etc. using nonfactual artist renderings and made up videos and graphics claiming these poor impotent "theories" are facts. That is not science but false religion! And most are simply taking the word of these wild-eyed lunatics without verifying their ridiculous claims or even applying common sense.
You reveal yourself and your low character.Truly people are bleating sheep. Baaaa, so you say baaaa, so anoth says baaaa