• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Europe needs to calm down about Greenland

rebornfree

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
May 5, 2007
8,828
14,594
NW England
✟1,009,170.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Divorced
A good illustration of irreconcilable differences between the US and Europe. We’re not going to see eye-to-eye on this, particularly being that Western Europe regularly changed territories and supported such well into the 20th Century.

I would not be surprised if the US and EU end up coming to blows within our lifetime. It’s not just Greenland; our differences are that great and will only increase.
Oh, I hope we don't come to blows. I'm in the UK, so not part of the EU anymore but we are aligned with them on some matters including Greenland.

I appreciate that several European nations created empires, including my own, so it must be a bit galling when we object to Trump trying to acquire another country. However, I thought the days of empires were over and everyone has learnt from our mistakes. :)
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
17,546
2,057
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟342,794.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Well, if someone in another suburb owned the house next door to you it would be their responsibility.
But if the person in a far away suburb is not fully taking care of the property and the neighbour has virtually taken on all the responsibility. Then thats a bit unfair. It then becomes ownership by name and not deed. They are paying everything to ensure security and acting like the owners.

Especially considering that the neighbour next door has a serious vested interest in ensuring next door is protected if its connected to their property as whatever happens there will affect them.
However, I think that Greenland is self-governing so I'm not sure how much say Denmark would have in its future. I appreciate that it is in North America, but if it was to be part of another country, on geographic grounds, it would make more sense for it to become part of Canada. However, I think that some of its citizens want it to remain a Danish Territory and others want independence from Denmark. So why would they want to be part of another country?
The US has seperated territories within that region like Alaska. I think if there was to be a single nation on that continent then its obviously the US with the superior ability. Especially considering that the Russians and China are sniffing around the area.
Even if it wasn't for the Danish connection I think Europe would concerned about Trump's attitude towards it. It's not just land; it's people's homes and way of life. You can't just say that you are going to have someone else's property and ride roughshod over their thoughts and feelings.
I don't think that would change. I don't think it would be a case of taking their rights to the area. Rather more a strategic responsibility and authorisation related to national security and ensuring everything is safe.

The issue I think is that the area is one of only a couple of territories that is mainly unoccupied. The ICE is melting and the region is opening up to exploration and development. All powerful nations are interested because its the last areas left on earth.

So moving forward imagine the case that Norway then develops it and becomes an extention of Europe on the US doorstep. Or that China or Russian start trouble. It will be the US who are most affected having nations outside its region infiltrating its region.

In some way, shape or form the US will need to be strongly represented in that region.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: rebornfree
Upvote 0

Palmfever

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 5, 2019
1,246
710
Hawaii
✟377,643.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Is the United States about to invade Greenland?

This sent the European elite straight to their oft-used fainting couches, which they had to stay firmly emplaced on when Trump himself weighed in and said he still aims to acquire Greenland. This has been his goal since 2019 and has been, off and on, a U.S. strategic aim since the 19th century.

Continued below.

“I will never have children,” Petersen told The Post, with tears of anger and sorrow welling in her eyes. “That choice was taken from me.”

While the government of Denmark officially apologized last year for decades of forced sterilization of Indigenous women and girls, the horrific mistreatment has cast a long shadow on the island that has become the center of an international ownership fight.

This week, the Danes hosted European troops for military exercises on Greenland, asserting they are protecting the island from outside powers — particularly the United States. But for many Inuit, Denmark itself has long been the real threat.

The Danes don’t see us as humans,” Petersen said at a local Inuit restaurant overlooking Nuuk’s famous fjords. “They think we’re too expensive, too small a population. But they take our land, our children, our lives and expect thanks.
Never-before-seen footage of uncontacted Amazonian tribe shared by conservationist

Greenlanders speak out against Danish rule after decades of forced sterilization, poor living conditions: ‘They stole our future’​

By
Caitlin Doornbos
Published Jan. 16, 2026, 7:52 p.m. ET
1.4K
Human safari' claims in Sarajevo: tearful mom of 6-year-old killed by sniper demands answers
NUUK, Greenland — Native Greenlander Amarok Petersen was 27 years old when she learned the gut-wrenching truth about why she couldn’t have children — and that Denmark was to blame.
Suffering from severe uterine problems, a medical doctor discovered an IUD birth control device in her body that she didn’t know she had.
Danish doctors had implanted it when she was just 13 as part of a population control program for thousands of native Greenlandic girls and women.
“I will never have children,” Petersen told The Post, with tears of anger and sorrow welling in her eyes. “That choice was taken from me.”
While the government of Denmark officially apologized last year for decades of forced sterilization of Indigenous women and girls, the horrific mistreatment has cast a long shadow on the island that has become the center of an international ownership fight.
This week, the Danes hosted European troops for military exercises on Greenland, asserting they are protecting the island from outside powers — particularly the United States. But for many Inuit, Denmark itself has long been the real threat.

The Danes don’t see us as humans,” Petersen said at a local Inuit restaurant overlooking Nuuk’s famous fjords. “They think we’re too expensive, too small a population. But they take our land, our children, our lives and expect thanks.”

Amarok Petersen, a Greenland resident, stands against a white wooden wall with string lights. 7
Amarok Petersen is one of thousands of Greenlandic women unable to have children after learning Danish doctors implanted an IUD birth control device in her womb as a child.Caitlin Doornbos/NY Post
Even in adulthood, medical decisions were made without Petersen’s consent. Plagued with problems after the IUD, she had repeated surgeries for unexplained pain. It wasn’t until years later that doctors informed her that her fallopian tubes had been removed in one of the operations in the early 2000s.
Her family also suffered under Denmark’s so-called “Little Danes experiment,” in which Greenlandic children were forcibly sent to Denmark for adoption or institutional care — often permanently separated from their families, she said.
The program, which ran from the 1950s through the 1970s, was part of Denmark’s broader effort to assimilate Greenlandic children, often without parental consent.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: rebornfree
Upvote 0

Tuur

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2022
3,130
1,700
Southeast
✟105,098.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oh, I hope we don't come to blows. I'm in the UK, so not part of the EU anymore but we are aligned with them on some matters including Greenland.

I appreciate that several European nations created empires, including my own, so it must be a bit galling when we object to Trump trying to acquire another country. However, I thought the days of empires were over and everyone has learnt from our mistakes. :)
I hope we don't come to blows, either, but I think that will happen one day due to rapidly diverging interests (to put it mildly).

Galling? No. Disingenuous? Yes, particularly the way, less than a century ago, Europe was involved in redrawing boundaries. It's not even about empires, either. A closer equivalent is the US and UK having a keen eye on places for coaling stations in the latter half of the 19th Century. The US has had it's eye on Greenland for strategic reasons for a long time, going back to just a little past the mid 1800s.

It didn't help matters that less than ten years ago Greenland started cozying up to the Chinese, to the point of discussing building an airport and mining. Denmark did a "What are you doing?" and squelched it. China has been shaping up to be a major adversary of the US for a long time, and the arctic look like a potential flash point between the US, China, and Russia. Interest in acquiring Greenland, like US and UK interest in coaling stations back in the day, comes from positioning the US to better deal with a potential conflict.

None of which means that Europe will approve. After all, Europe has its own interests. But European isn't the major factor here.

Does that mean the US will get Greenland? We'll see. Right now the US is content to be nice about it. Yes, for us this is nice. If China makes a move to have a presence on Greenland, nice won't matter.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: rebornfree
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
40,011
29,763
Pacific Northwest
✟836,818.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
The President of the United States, quite recently, illegally took the Venezuelan president captive. This administration has, over the last 12 months consistently proven that it has precisely zero regard for the rule of law, either international law nor US law.

What is absolutely evident is that the ordinary expectations from the leader of the free world does not apply to this president, nor to his administration. This is an unprecedented turn of events in the history of American politics, and the last time a major world leader said the sorts of things this one says, and the world refused to take it seriously, it became the Second World War.

Our international friends in Europe, and elsewhere, are perfectly justified in their abundance of caution.

Pretending that the current POTUS is nothing more than a pompous blowhard, and not a genuine threat to global security, is no longer a valid response.

A good US president once said, "Speak softly and carry a big stick." The world has a moral responsibility to carry a big stick. And until the day We the People of these United States reclaim our nation from this current darkness, I pray for peace, and for wisdom among the leaders of the world, and that all freedom-loving people everywhere stand their ground against tyranny, oppression, and the wicked strong men who would desecrate human liberty, dignity, and the rule of law.

Germany went through her hour of darkness and was able to come out of it a better nation. And I believe that the United States, if enough people are willing to heed the wisdom of the past and have ears to hear and eyes to see where America's current road is heading, will be able to avoid being overwhelmed by the dark bitterness and come out without becoming an ugly chapter in the history of modern human civilization. But as long as this administration remains unchecked and unopposed, it is a threat not only to the lives of all American citizens and residents; it is a threat to the whole world. And if peace and order are to be sustained, then I pray it come through the hard won fight of those who are committed to peace, non-violence, democracy, and human freedom.

May God have mercy, and save us from ourselves.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: rebornfree
Upvote 0

rebornfree

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
May 5, 2007
8,828
14,594
NW England
✟1,009,170.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Divorced
I hope we don't come to blows, either, but I think that will happen one day due to rapidly diverging interests (to put it mildly).

Galling? No. Disingenuous? Yes, particularly the way, less than a century ago, Europe was involved in redrawing boundaries. It's not even about empires, either. A closer equivalent is the US and UK having a keen eye on places for coaling stations in the latter half of the 19th Century. The US has had it's eye on Greenland for strategic reasons for a long time, going back to just a little past the mid 1800s.

It didn't help matters that less than ten years ago Greenland started cozying up to the Chinese, to the point of discussing building an airport and mining. Denmark did a "What are you doing?" and squelched it. China has been shaping up to be a major adversary of the US for a long time, and the arctic look like a potential flash point between the US, China, and Russia. Interest in acquiring Greenland, like US and UK interest in coaling stations back in the day, comes from positioning the US to better deal with a potential conflict.

None of which means that Europe will approve. After all, Europe has its own interests. But European isn't the major factor here.

Does that mean the US will get Greenland? We'll see. Right now the US is content to be nice about it. Yes, for us this is nice. If China makes a move to have a presence on Greenland, nice won't matter.
I think Greenland is willing for an expansion of the US base there. No need to own the territory.
 
Upvote 0

Trogdor the Burninator

Senior Veteran
Oct 19, 2004
6,366
3,056
✟304,436.00
Faith
Christian
I think in Europe nations claiming a land which is actually within the American noth continent and completely seperate from mainland European continent seems a little unreal.

I mean the US has to regard Greenland as an extension of their territory as its part of their territory. To then say a nation in a different territory should be the guardian and have overseering rights to everything that goes into protecting and securing such a region seems rediculous.

Its like saying that someone in another suburb is responsible for the house next door to me. When my property actually is part of the neighbouring property and they are in another suburb. Its logical that as Greenland is part of the US territory as a continent and its an extention of their territory for which needs to be secured. That the US have rights to this.

And there it is - America's 9-dash line.

And if anyone in the American continent has any "rights' to claim Greenland, it's Canada. the nearest US border is over 2,000 klm away.

Speaking of Canada, maybe they should claim that piece of the US hanging out to their west all on its own with no land link to the other 48 states.
 
Upvote 0