Oompa Loompa
Well-Known Member
- Jun 4, 2020
- 10,867
- 5,829
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
It wasnt even an execution.It wasn't a summary execution.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It wasnt even an execution.It wasn't a summary execution.
It wasn't. You think it was an execution because liberal talking heads on the television told you to think it was an execution.Sure it wasn't.![]()
Frankly, what killed the woman was not the cop, but the leftist brainwashing that compelled her to not only put herself, but her child in a dangerous situation. Yes, leftist rhetoric killed her, not the cop.What would you do if you believed someone is trying to run you over with an SUV and you couldn't get out of the way?
I agree. She was not trying to run the cop over. She was trying to flee arrest and did not care if a cop was run over. Honestly, if the cop had not moved out of the way, do you really think that in her heightened state of panic, she would have stopped to avoid running over the cop? I would imagine the cop believed the obvious answer was NO. If I was a cop, I would rather go home in hand cuffs than in a body bag. That woman not only deliberately inserted herself, but her own child, into a danger situation knowing the risks. Did she deserve to die? No! Was the ICE agent wrong for shooting her? No!Nobody was trying to run him over. If she was she had ample opportunity when he was more directly in front of the car. Does every person almost hit by a car have the same right to shoot the driver?
I mean, a bruise is technically internal bleeding, so...-ICE Agent Suffered Internal Bleeding After Minneapolis Shooting? true or not true
The ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good during a January 7 encounter in Minneapolis suffered internal bleeding to the torso, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed to Newsweek on Wednesday.
Civilian violence to affect a political outcome is terrorism.
People sometimes have real difficulty in acknowledging that both things can be true at the same time.Did she deserve to die? No! Was the ICE agent wrong for shooting her? No!
No its not. Most of us conservatives never condoned any of the violence or any calls for violence that occurred on that day. Most of us also do not condone anyone breaking into the Capitol either. An awful lot of people never broke in. Some were let in. A great many people were also over prosecuted. All if these things can be true.Unless you are part of an unruly mob assaulting police and breaking into the US Capitol for the intent of overturning an election and hanging the Vice President. That's patriotic.
With how rapidly it happened, there probably wasn't a lot of time to react/assess between shots. (Hence the reason why a lot of LEO-involved shootings don't involve just a single shot)I had a thought.
The bullet hole in the windshield, fired from the angle it seemed to have come from, night have missed Ms Good altogether, meaning that the second and/or third shots done did the damage.
I’ve seen LEO’s opine that the first shot was “okay” but the send two were at best “iffy”.
This is all speculation since there’s going to be no investigation into this incident.
I did not see him getting hit by the car, in the film I saw. I might read or hear someone saying it shows in the film, but this does not mean it is true, and not that I saw.suffered internal bleeding
She had a *kid* with her while she did that???? This is the first time I have read this . . . if this is what mean. Among other things, that would be reckless endangerment and possibly contributing to the delinquency of a minor.her child in a dangerous situation
No child was in the car. I don’t know where that came from. She did have her dog in the car and her wife was outside the car. The child was in school at the time.I did not see him getting hit by the car, in the film I saw. I might read or hear someone saying it shows in the film, but this does not mean it is true, and not that I saw.
She had a *kid* with her while she did that???? This is the first time I have read this . . . if this is what mean. Among other things, that would be reckless endangerment and possibly contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
And if people are interfering with the arrest of rapists and murderers and terrorists, they are coconspirators, I would say. Not to mention, I doubt the activists know who could be arrested; so they have no way to know if they are interfering with the removal of a dangerous person.
Plus, it seems ones are accusing ICE people of crimes . . . presuming them guilty before a proper investigation and trial. Treating an agent like the person is guilty, even before the agent has worked at a scene is not constitutional.
I did not see him getting hit by the car, in the film I saw. I might read or hear someone saying it shows in the film, but this does not mean it is true, and not that I saw.
She had a *kid* with her while she did that???? This is the first time I have read this . . . if this is what mean. Among other things, that would be reckless endangerment and possibly contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
And if people are interfering with the arrest of rapists and murderers and terrorists, they are coconspirators, I would say. Not to mention, I doubt the activists know who could be arrested; so they have no way to know if they are interfering with the removal of a dangerous person.
Plus, it seems ones are accusing ICE people of crimes . . . presuming them guilty before a proper investigation and trial. Treating an agent like the person is guilty, even before the agent has worked at a scene is not constitutional.
That would mean that while we are viewing the video, with an ICE agent taking one pop through her window, there's supposed to be a kid in the back seat. Are"you" telling me he took that shot, knowing a kid was in the car? Or, was he that incompetent an observer so he did not see the kid???? And then the car moves off and crashes into another car. And there is no obvious action to get a kid right out of the car, during that film, and have the child checked by emergency medical responders. Plus, the shot woman's partner does not obviously indicate a kid needs to be rescued; I think she would have tried to get custody of the child, right away.reported, by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
From what I've read there wasn't anyone else in the car.That would mean that while we are viewing the video, with an ICE agent taking one pop through her window, there's supposed to be a kid in the back seat. Are"you" telling me he took that shot, knowing a kid was in the car?
+In the case of agent Ross:
- Combat veteran with two tours in Iraq.
- CBP officer in El Paso from 2007-2014
----during which time, he was a FBI/CBP joint task force team leader (from what I'm reading, in a SWAT capacity) during Cartel-focused operations
- Joined ICE in 2015.
Perhaps I had the dog confused with the kid.No child was in the car. I don’t know where that came from. She did have her dog in the car and her wife was outside the car. The child was in school at the time.