Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm not a Baptist -Of course they don't mention baptism. Baptists always love to go to all passages of Scripture that don't teach anything about baptism and children whatsoever and try to prove who should or should not be baptized.
No - it is proper exegesis. Speaking of a specific topic bring exegetical evidence of that specific topic.Strange way of doing exegesis.
Yes, that comment is very strange because I did nothing of the sort -Kinda like going to passages of Scripture that only teach end time theology and say....we should not pray because all these passages of Scripture don't mention prayer. Strange.
Where?Our main rule for interpreting Scripture is: CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT. We only use passages of Scripture that teach something about baptism and children mentioned contextually together. Are there passages of Scripture in the NT that mention children and baptism contextually together? Of course there are.
Again - I am not a Baptist -Baptists use strange hermenuetics in order to explain away baptism including infants altogether.
Where?
I am not a Paedobaptist
- Paedobaptist interpretative rule: study baptismal texts that mention children to see if children should be baptized.
I am not a Credobaptist
- Credobaptist interpretative rule: go to all the texts that DO NOT TEACH BAPTISM NOR REFER TO CHILDREN to determine who should be baptized.
I wouldn't know - since once again - I am not any of thoseThis is stacking the hermenuetical deck in the credo's favor. This is why it is so difficult if impossible to converse with the credos. Different standards.
Please cite it - I can not seem to find it.As for where in Scripture baptism and children are spoken of contextually together....one of texts was mentioned by Chapter and verse in this thread.
You are eloquently proving that with every accusation of who you think I am - when I am not.Sometimes bias doesn't allow us to see things that are there.
Neither a credo nor paedo? I am wasting my time here. Sorry for wasting your time also. I aplogize.I am not a Paedobaptist
I am not a Credobaptist
I wouldn't know - since once again - I am not any of those
Please cite it - I can not seem to find it.
You are eloquently proving that with every accusation of who you think I am - when I am not.
at some point, replies like this become a waste of forum bandwidth and only decrease the ability of anyone else reading the thread to understand what anyone is talking about.I’m one of many who would disagree.
whats left if you aren't either of those?Neither a credo nor paedo? I am wasting my time here. Sorry for wasting your time also. I aplogize.
As is replying to and complaining about a posters comments a similar waste of bad widthat some point, replies like this become a waste of forum bandwidth and only decrease the ability of anyone else reading the thread to understand what anyone is talking about.
Do you believe your comment is a better use of bandwidth?for what its worth, i agree with everything ain't zwingling in post #78.
Terminology is the issue here - a Baptist is most commonly the title of a Protestant denomination. Of which I am not a member. I do not have a clue what the other types of baptist the poster mentioned are and the poster offered no clarity nor explanation.whats left if you aren't either of those?
I will no longer engage in discussion with you. You refuse to answer basic questions and deflect.There are a number of references I'd like you to look at:first reference
Acts 19:1 And it happened, while Apollos was at Corinth, that Paul, having passed through the upper regions, came to Ephesus. And finding some disciples 2 he said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?”So they said to him, “We have not so much as heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.”3 And he said to them, “Into what then were you baptized?”So they said, “Into John’s baptism.”4 Then Paul said, “John indeed baptized with a baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they should believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.”5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied. 7 Now the men were about twelve in all.Notice - Paul is speaking with disciples - (saved) -
1. They are already had experienced the baptism into repentance -
2. Then Paul Baptized them a second time in the Name of the Lord Jesus and the Holy Spirit came upon them.
Second reference -
Heb 6:1 Therefore, leaving the discussion of the elementary principles of Christ, let us go on to perfection, not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, of the doctrine of baptisms, of laying on of hands, of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.Baptisms - plural.
Third reference:
John 20:21 21 So Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send you.” 22 And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit.They received the Holy Spirit - then later -
Acts 1: 4 And being assembled together with them, He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the Promise of the Father, “which,” He said, “you have heard from Me; 5 for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.”Three distinct and very plainly written Scriptures - each demonstrating more than one Baptism.
look again at
Eph 4:4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism; 6 one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.Is it possible that the subject of the sentence is our entrance into the Body of Christ and yes, there is one Baptism into Christ - but as evidenced by Paul's own writings and actions - there was another where the Holy Spirit was involved.
If your answer is no - them please explain the above notated Scriptures.
Ok. As clear as I can make it.What hinders you from providing your own clarity?
www.sbc.net
I wasn’t addressing you personally. That is why I didn’t quote you.I will no longer engage in discussion with you. You refuse to answer basic questions and deflect.
If you want to go back and answer the question I asked in post #7 and at least 3 other subsequent times, then we can talk. As long as you continue to ignore my questions, I have no interest in any further discussion. So, totally up to you.
A great diagnostic question.if we do not come into this world with a fallen human nature, then why do we need to be saved at all?
Amalgam. We were built hybrids, flesh and spirit.. The choice of which nature to follow was also built in. A&E took the lead in making that choice when they followed their fleshy instinct to serve self instead of the spirit of God. Self became their god. I doubt God expected any different, combining two opposing wills. Is not understanding the result of learning rather than following and memorizing/mimicking? It's not like other creatures who follow self with no other option, being flesh. We need to learn how best to use this new concept. Its not like God hasn't continually told us how, but of course being focused on self, we'd rather find our own way. Good luck with that.A great diagnostic question