- Mar 27, 2007
- 37,623
- 5,360
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Strawman. No one made such an argument. Fulfilled means complete not delete.
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Do the Ten Commandments apply to Christians today?
- Thread starter Michie
- Start date
- Mar 27, 2007
- 37,623
- 5,360
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Irrelevant. No sabbath here.
Again, irrelevant. No sabbath here.
No one read Gen. 2:2-3 until God gave the tablets of stone to Moses in the 15th century BCE.
No. That is you reading your pet doctrine into the text. Jesus holds ultimate authority over the sabbath.
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2008
- 53,645
- 12,078
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
Not true.
Adam did not "take God's name in vain"
Gen 6-7 shows that even the distinction between CLEAN vs UNCLEAN animals we observed before the flood
And no command saying "Do not take God's name in vain" n Gen 1-10 either
By not following the point from the very start you miss the entire post
Gen 2 has the Sabbath as even the Sabbath commandment of Ex 20:8-11 explicitly states in vs 11.
The point remains.
Adam did not "take God's name in vain"
Gen 6-7 shows that even the distinction between CLEAN vs UNCLEAN animals we observed before the flood
And no command saying "Do not take God's name in vain" n Gen 1-10 either
By not following the point from the very start you miss the entire post
Gen 2 has the Sabbath as even the Sabbath commandment of Ex 20:8-11 explicitly states in vs 11.
The point remains.
Upvote
0
- Mar 27, 2007
- 37,623
- 5,360
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Irrelevant. No sabbath here.
Strawman. No one has argued against the 3rd commandment.
The point does not remain. No one kept the sabbath before Moses. There is no verse showing this. If you have one then by all means post it.
Upvote
0
- May 5, 2007
- 8,785
- 14,550
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Divorced
I tend to agree with the article. (So glad that it's okay to wear poly/cotton clothing though! 
)
)
Upvote
0
Similar threads
