• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

the myth of flat earth debunked again

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
10,548
7,535
70
Midwest
✟384,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It has always struck me as weird. Metaphor is at the heart of language. To my knowledge this has been so for millenia. We tell tales using all kinds of rhetorical devices and images and comparisons and analogies, in order to tell a greater truth and yet all of the power and richness and diversity is discarded and denied in place of a dry, empty literal desert. How sad.
I am just awakening to "Communication" and Rhetorical studies. All the way back to Romans and Greeks. So much.

It's like arguing over whether a turtle really raced a hare and missing the point.
 
Upvote 0

Astrophile

Newbie
Aug 30, 2013
2,338
1,559
78
England
✟264,026.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Widowed
Excuse me? What do you mean by "your version of Christianity" in reference to @Aussie Pete who identifies as Non Denom?

Also, you are responding to the beginning of a thread that is now over 1000 posts. You are a bit late to the party and I doubt you've taken the time to read all the responses. Do you honestly think you are bringing something new to the discussion?
I apologise for taking so long to respond to the thread; I was uncertain about the issues under discussion, and whether I could contribute anything useful. However, I now think that I can say something new.

As I see it, this is an epistemic matter. Aussie Pete began by citing the observations by Colonel Williams (a committed Christian) in support of the hypothesis that the Earth is spherical. This implies that Aussie Pete believes that valid scientific conclusions can be drawn from empirical evidence. However, Isaiah 11:3 says that Jews and Christians must not base conclusions on what they can see and hear, and the articles of faith of creationist organisations say that scientific evidence can never take precedence over the teaching of the Bible. In other threads, Aussie Pete himself has rejected the overwhelming evidence for evolution in favour of the Biblical teaching of a six-day creation, so he appears to have been inconsistent.

Later Aussie Pete (post 9) said that the Bible does not teach that the Earth is flat. He did not say what he would believe about the shape of the Earth if the Bible did teach that it was flat. D Taylor and contratodo (post 17) contradicted this, and contratodo cited Biblical verses in support of the hypotheses that the Earth is flat and the sky (or firmament) is a solid vault. If D Taylor and contratodo are correct and the Bible does teach that the Earth is flat, will Aussie Pete accept this Biblical teaching or will he continue to accept the empirical evidence presented by Colonel Williams?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,540
7,641
31
Wales
✟440,690.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
31,848
10,842
NW England
✟1,375,478.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
26,111
8,450
Dallas
✟1,131,121.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Ugh, that's gross, the fact you care at all about your 'scores' when you're being mocked for your crackpot views.
Yeah I’ve never like the whole scoring idea in CF.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
26,111
8,450
Dallas
✟1,131,121.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I apologise for taking so long to respond to the thread; I was uncertain about the issues under discussion, and whether I could contribute anything useful. However, I now think that I can say something new.

As I see it, this is an epistemic matter. Aussie Pete began by citing the observations by Colonel Williams (a committed Christian) in support of the hypothesis that the Earth is spherical. This implies that Aussie Pete believes that valid scientific conclusions can be drawn from empirical evidence. However, Isaiah 11:3 says that Jews and Christians must not base conclusions on what they can see and hear, and the articles of faith of creationist organisations say that scientific evidence can never take precedence over the teaching of the Bible. In other threads, Aussie Pete himself has rejected the overwhelming evidence for evolution in favour of the Biblical teaching of a six-day creation, so he appears to have been inconsistent.

Later Aussie Pete (post 9) said that the Bible does not teach that the Earth is flat. He did not say what he would believe about the shape of the Earth if the Bible did teach that it was flat. D Taylor and contratodo (post 17) contradicted this, and contratodo cited Biblical verses in support of the hypotheses that the Earth is flat and the sky (or firmament) is a solid vault. If D Taylor and contratodo are correct and the Bible does teach that the Earth is flat, will Aussie Pete accept this Biblical teaching or will he continue to accept the empirical evidence presented by Colonel Williams?
I’m a young earth creationist and I don’t see any conclusive evidence to support evolution. Evidence in support of a particular theory or position doesn’t verify the validity of that theory or position if the evidence is inconclusive.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
26,111
8,450
Dallas
✟1,131,121.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I apologise for taking so long to respond to the thread; I was uncertain about the issues under discussion, and whether I could contribute anything useful. However, I now think that I can say something new.

As I see it, this is an epistemic matter. Aussie Pete began by citing the observations by Colonel Williams (a committed Christian) in support of the hypothesis that the Earth is spherical. This implies that Aussie Pete believes that valid scientific conclusions can be drawn from empirical evidence. However, Isaiah 11:3 says that Jews and Christians must not base conclusions on what they can see and hear, and the articles of faith of creationist organisations say that scientific evidence can never take precedence over the teaching of the Bible. In other threads, Aussie Pete himself has rejected the overwhelming evidence for evolution in favour of the Biblical teaching of a six-day creation, so he appears to have been inconsistent.

Later Aussie Pete (post 9) said that the Bible does not teach that the Earth is flat. He did not say what he would believe about the shape of the Earth if the Bible did teach that it was flat. D Taylor and contratodo (post 17) contradicted this, and contratodo cited Biblical verses in support of the hypotheses that the Earth is flat and the sky (or firmament) is a solid vault. If D Taylor and contratodo are correct and the Bible does teach that the Earth is flat, will Aussie Pete accept this Biblical teaching or will he continue to accept the empirical evidence presented by Colonel Williams?
I’m just curious, have you ever traveled all the way across Australia going east or west? If so what means of travel did you use and how long did it take?
 
Upvote 0

Bob Crowley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2015
4,028
2,555
71
Logan City
✟1,002,916.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I’m just curious, have you ever traveled all the way across Australia going east or west? If so what means of travel did you use and how long did it take?
I'm not interested in the flat earth debate, but I have driven from Brisbane to Perth and return three times (a long time ago).

It took about six days each way allowing for sufficient breaks between driving.

From Brisbane to Perth the road distance is about 4310 kilometres, so each day required about 718 kilometres (446 miles).

I've flown once with the distance being 3614 air kilometres or 2245 air miles. Flight time is about 5.25 hours. There's a two hour time difference so going from Brisbane to Perth we gained two hours, and lost two hours on the return trip.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,540
7,641
31
Wales
✟440,690.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,540
7,641
31
Wales
✟440,690.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
  • Like
Reactions: BNR32FAN
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
24,357
16,658
72
Bondi
✟394,998.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I’m just curious, have you ever traveled all the way across Australia going east or west? If so what means of travel did you use and how long did it take?
Not sure of the relevance...but I just got back last week from driving from Sydney to Perth and back. Took 5 weeks, but that included a lot of stopping en route. Total distance driven: 10, 200km.
 
Upvote 0

Brother Del

Member
Nov 18, 2025
23
5
Oregon
✟383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Okay, I just have to ask: Is FE really a thing and not a bunch of people pulling someone's leg?
Funny, I occasionally have the exact same thoughts about the heliocentric model.

And then I come back to my senses and remember what an evil and cunning little snot the devil can be, and how easily men can be deceived.
 
Upvote 0

Brother Del

Member
Nov 18, 2025
23
5
Oregon
✟383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
-
Instead of using sinful man to make your point about God's creation. Why do you not use The Bible, I know why but you will not admit it. Because there is no creation descriptions in The Bible supporting a deceptive globe earth.
Nope, none at all.
 
Upvote 0

Brother Del

Member
Nov 18, 2025
23
5
Oregon
✟383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
7,647
5,238
NW
✟279,355.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I’m a young earth creationist and I don’t see any conclusive evidence to support evolution. Evidence in support of a particular theory or position doesn’t verify the validity of that theory or position if the evidence is inconclusive.
A theory is never proved conclusively.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
24,178
14,719
60
Sydney, Straya
✟1,493,979.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
You mean like every major character from the bible? Moses, the Prophets, Joshua (who prayed, and the sun stood still in the sky).
Please demonstrate where any of the above write that the earth is flat.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,181
17,238
55
USA
✟436,503.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
You mean like every major character from the bible? Moses, the Prophets, Joshua (who prayed, and the sun stood still in the sky).
At least they had excuses. The proper shape of the Earth was not yet known in their world. What is your excuse?
 
Upvote 0