The Question of the Inversion (Daniel 9:25–26)
Why does the phrasing in Daniel 9:25 appear inverted—saying “weeks sixty and two”—while Daniel 9:26 preserves the more expected order, “after the sixty and two weeks”? This difference is not stylistic but structural. In verse 25, the noun שָׁבֻעִים (shāvuʿim, “weeks”) comes before the numbers, producing an inverted order:
שָׁבֻעִים שִׁשִּׁים וּשְׁנַיִם shāvuʿim shishim u-shenayim → “Weeks sixty and two.”
In verse 26, the order returns to normal and is introduced by the preposition אַחֲרֵי (’aḥarē, “after”), describing a completed period:
אַחֲרֵי הַשָּׁבֻעִים שִׁשִּׁים וּשְׁנַיִם ’aḥarē ha-shāvuʿim shishim u-shenayim → “After the sixty and two weeks
The Meaning of the Difference
The inversion in Daniel 9:25 (“weeks sixty and two”) intentionally draws attention to a specific week within the second set of seventy weeks—the second sixtieth week. By placing “weeks” first, the focus shifts from the completed total to the class of weeks itself, highlighting an active prophetic week within that second cycle of 70 weeks.
In contrast, Daniel 9:26 (“after the sixty and two weeks”) uses the normal Hebrew order to describe the completion of the first sixty-two weeks of the first seventy-week cycle, the period that ends with Messiah being “cut off.”
Summary
Verse Hebrew Order Translation Reference Emphasis
Daniel 9:25 שָׁבֻעִים שִׁשִּׁים וּשְׁנַיִם “Weeks 60 and 2” Second 70-week set Highlights the second 60th week — a specific prophetic event within the latter cycle Daniel 9:26 אַחֲרֵי הַשָּׁבֻעִים שִׁשִּׁים וּשְׁנַיִם “After the 60 and 2 weeks” First 70-week set Refers to the completed 62-week span ending with Messiah’s cutting off
✅ Key Insight
The Hebrew inversion separates two distinct prophetic frameworks.
Daniel 9:25 — “Weeks 60 and 2” → marks the second 60th week, the focal point of covenant strengthening and transition in the latter seventy-week administration.
Daniel 9:26 — “After the 60 and 2 weeks” → describes the conclusion of the first 62-week period, which ends in Messiah’s rejection.
Thus, the inversion functions as a deliberate prophetic divider: verse 25 isolates an active week within the future cycle, while verse 26 recounts the fulfilled span of the former one.