Not sure what you mean by this last sentence. Perhaps you could explain what it means.The fruits of Sola Scriptura with no authoritative teaching.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not sure what you mean by this last sentence. Perhaps you could explain what it means.The fruits of Sola Scriptura with no authoritative teaching.
Not sure what else I can say besides what I did say.Not sure what you mean by this last sentence. Perhaps you could explain what it means.
I don't have an issue, it's not a title I have used nor particularly care about. But if you're going to complain about a term, at least take the time to understand how those who use it understand it rather than just assuming that they mean something nefarious.I support your right to believe that -
it differs from both Scripture and now the Roman Catholic Church
Have an issue - take it up with the pope
Quoting an article from the Vatican is not complaining. It is quoting an article.I don't have an issue, it's not a title I have used nor particularly care about. But if you're going to complain about a term, at least take the time to understand how those who use it understand it rather than just assuming that they mean something nefarious.
Are you challenging that statement?Where in the Bible does it say Jesus is the 2nd Person of the Trinity?
See post #82Are you challenging that statement?
So where in the Bible do you find the word "Trinity"? . . .or "sovereign," for that matter?
Biblical truth is not necessariy presented in one simple statement.
So, you might start with sorting out what Jesus said:
The Son is subject to the Father, for the Son is sent by the Father in the Father's name (Jn 5:23, 36, 43).
The Spirit is subject to the Father, for the Spirit is sent by the Father in the Son's name (Jn 14:26).
The Spirit is subject to the Son as well as the Father, for the Spirit is sent by the Son as well as the Father (Jn 15:26, 16:7, 14:26, Ac 2:33).
If you can rectify Jesus' above revelation of the Trinity with Jesus being anything but the second person of the Trinity, feel free to show us how.
Agreed. . .which was Biblically refuted. . .which refutation (post #86) you cannot address.See post #82
See post #72Agreed. . .which was Biblically refuted. . .which refutation (post #86) you cannot address.
And that's a good thing. . .because your assertion would be heresy.
Feel free to address its refutation in post #86, following:See post #72
That language has always been used to describe the Holy Trinity. No one said they were not co-equal.Jesus is NOT the "2nd person" of the Trinity. All three Members of the Godhead are co-equal. You are not reading the right scholars.
I'm sorry that you took offense when offense was never offered. Care to add to the topic?It's how you've framed it, and pressed the issue in this thread.
Offense? Hardly. I think I've added to the topic by rebutting your false presentation of what other people believe and the phrases they use.I'm sorry that you took offense when offense was never offered. Care to add to the topic?
step in the right directionSo what do YOU make of it?