Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He shouldn't have been charged with anything but disorderly conduct, or given a warningSomeone is being a nuisance in a bar. You're standing there and he throws a packet of crisps at you and runs off. What do you and your friends do?
If it was me we'd all burst out laughing. Which is what the officer and his colleagues should have done. Anything else, like them charging after him in full riot gear and armed to the teeth just makes them look like idiots.
If I was the guy''s commander I'd tear him another. 'Just what the ..... did you think you were doing! He threw a sandwich?' I'd seriously consider standing him down for overreacting.
It most certainly was. And I'm not just talking about this one incident, @iluvatar5150 made this about respect for all law enforcement officers (or lack thereof)Bradski made the point already. Basic human dignity was not involved.
Well, get after that guy who hurled those chips at you at point blank range. It was an affront to your basic human dignity! Well, get after him assuming you hadn't been too badly hurt and needed medical assistance.It most certainly was.
I would love to see you try to do the jobWell, get after that guy who hurled those chips at you at point blank range. It was an affront to your basic human dignity! Well, get after him assuming you hadn't been too badly hurt and needed medical assistance.
Like the Frog Battalion in Portland taunting ICE officers with doughnuts. Trump wanted them arrested, too.It most certainly was. And I'm not just talking about this one incident, @iluvatar5150 made this about respect for all law enforcement officers (or lack thereof)
What bias is that?"get really suspicious when cops start talking about "disrespect."
You're showing your bias
There's nothing to arrest them for and I have not been talking about anything Trump wantsLike the Frog Battalion in Portland taunting ICE officers with doughnuts. Trump wanted them arrested, too.
Sorry, mate. The nonsense value and humerous opportunities of the discussion have dissipated, leaving nothing of worth to discuss.I would love to see you try to do the job
They were intending to show disrespect to the ICE officers. The guy with the sandwich was just exasperated.There's nothing to arrest them for and I have not been talking about anything Trump wants
CBP agents are just regular people. They get paid to do a job. They probably didn't want to be there but they were following orders.What bias is that?
I'm not saying you're wrong, just that I'm not exactly clear on what you're referring to.
You can't arrest someone for disrespect. My question has been is disrespect acceptable morally, not legallyThey were intending to show disrespect to the ICE officers. The guy with the sandwich was just exasperated.
I would say you've had nothing to add for some time nowSorry, mate. The nonsense value and humerous opportunities of the discussion have dissipated, leaving nothing of worth to discuss.
OK, I can agree with that. The trouble is that the morality of the disrespected plays into it as well. If you're on shakey moral ground then even body armor won't protect you from the disrespect of others.You can't arrest someone for disrespect. My argument has been is disrespect right morally, not legally
I think they should all be sent home. ICE should stop working in sanctuary cities. They should ramp up enforcement everywhere else. Sanctuary cities should be the only place where illegal immigrants don't get deported.OK, I can agree with that. The trouble is that the morality of the disrespected plays into it as well. If you're on shakey moral ground then even body armor won't protect you from the disrespect of others.
People are saying the officer should have ignored it, they totally excuse the person who threw the sandwich. What makes it okay to throw things at people and disrespect them? What would they say if an officer did it to a civilian?
To clarify, what I meant was I was unclear about the bias you were alleging.CBP agents are just regular people. They get paid to do a job. They probably didn't want to be there but they were following orders.
It's not unreasonable to suggest that they should be treated with the same respect as any other human being.
@BCP1928 just said disrespecting them as law enforcement officers is not the same as disrespecting them as human beings. When someone puts on a uniform they are no longer human beings?
Sandwich guy should have been charged with disorderly conduct or let go with a warning. But I don't blame those guys for losing their tempers
I've already said the exact same thing earlier in the thread.
It was disorderly conduct. Assault was overcharging.
But in the grand scheme of things it was disrespectful.
@Bradskii for one, thinks it should have been ignoredPeople? Here?
I agree, the guy should have been charged with disorderly conduct or let go with a warningAgreed.
The government, or in this case, the DC Federal Attorney, chose to first charge the defenent with a felony. When the judge shot that down, "Sandwich Guy was charged with misdemeanor assault under 18 U.S.C. 111(a)(1), which prohibits forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, or interfering with federal officials or employees “while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties.”
The Feds went overboard to assert their authority.....and look tough.....from the way they arrested the defendent (with video cameras rolling) to the overcharging and going to court. At any point, a resonable prosecutor would have found a way to settle on a lessor charge to avoid a trial. Alas, the DC Attorney's office had other objectives than serving justice.