- Mar 4, 2005
- 31,698
- 10,598
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
No, they're not invalid.The charge if misreading and misapplying, would stick if Gods plans were all over and what I thought would happen; didn't.
But it's not all over yet by a long way, so your accusations are invalid.
The scroll and the basket in Zechariah 5 are two different things. They probably are different in the Hebrew too, otherwise translators would not translate them differently.
The scroll was flying and had a message on both sides. The angel explained what it meant - a message was going out over all the land that thieves and liars would be banished.
Then the angel said "look up and see what is appearing". The scroll wasn't appearing, it was there and had already been seen.
It was a basket/measuring container that was appearing. This container had a cover. From the context it is clear that the lead cover covered the opening of the container, because the angel looked inside.
In your scenario, the entire object - which was the same as the scroll and tube shaped - was covered in lead.
Zechariah was speaking God's word for that time. Prophecy is not spiritual fortune telling and is not mainly about the future.
Zechariah described a series of visions - a man among the myrtle trees, a man with a measuring line, Joshua, the high priest, standing before the Lord with clean garments, and so on. All of these things had significance for what the Lord was saying at that time.
You haven't addressed these other visions or even considered the rest of the book - but selected chapter 5 and made it seem as though the Lord was prophesying that Iran would use/have nuclear bombs.
No, I reject your explanation because the text does not support it.Your reason to reject my explanation is because it cannot apply to todays situation, correct?
1. The scroll and the basket are two different objects.
2. The message on the scroll, on one side condemns thieves, on the other, condemns those who speak falsely. Only those two groups of people are condemned - not adulterers, those who worship idols or anyone else.
3. The angel said that the basket was their iniquity (NIV. Many Bibles have the word "appearance" or "sight"/"eye" in this verse) throughout the land. Iniquity = sin; all sin not just thieves and liars.
4. The word basket is also translated as "measuring container". This receptacle is wickedness; "measuring container" suggests that the Lord has been measuring, or keeping count of, their sin.
5. The book of Zechariah begins with the Lord saying that he was angry with their ancestors who did not listen to the prophets who told them to repent. He, the Lord, says "return to me and I will return to you", Zechariah 1:3. The rest of the book seems to be about punishing/blessing the people and also punishing their enemies.
I'm not rejecting the text but your interpretation of it.No, but flat rejection without a feasible alternative, is unacceptable.
I have talked about Zechariah 5 and also about reading Scripture in context and not just applying it to today because you believe that is the right thing to do.
You have rejected that because you seem fixated on the idea that the prophets came to prophesy messages for our future. This prophecy of Zechariah's, you say, needs to be fulfilled, has not yet been and will therefore be fulfilled in the future. With that in mind, you have come up with an interpretation that has the prophet foreseeing that Iran will have nuclear bombs.
No one else anywhere in the NT even hints at such a thing.
This is not the Eschatology section of the forum but the Controversial theology section. If it had been in the Eschatology section and I had chosen to go onto that forum just to say that I didn't want to discuss end times - that would be a valid question, because my actions and my words would be at odds with each other.Why are you here then, discussing end time things?
I was intrigued by the title of your thread, read it and chose to reply saying that I do not agree.
Besides, saying that the Lord has shown me things through his word - i.e taught me - by "end times" is not one of them, does not stop me from commenting on your beliefs about end times.
If they will be accomplished, then they will be accomplished. Iran might even have, and set off, a nuclear bomb.The Lord has opened my eyes to how many of His Words thru the Prophets, will be accomplished.
That still doesn't mean you are correct to say that is the message of Zec 5.
Upvote
0