• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Stained Glass Ceiling or Cliff?

RamiC

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2025
836
630
Brighton
✟36,773.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I always live in hope of seeing the world's power imbalances resolved, so we can normalise a bit more diversity, but this article seems to do a good job of covering the difficulties that start to emerge. Whole article linked underneath my selected quote, and I added the bolding.

Sarah Mullally breaks the Anglican Communion’s glass ceiling

"In stable times, these credentials would be more than enough to earn the confidence of the faithful. But this is not a particularly stable time...

Mullally’s expertise as a nurse and a pastoral theologian gives her a unique set of qualifications to address such a situation. Yet her appointment also follows a pattern seen in the secular world: When the identity of “man” becomes too problematic, bring in a woman. Indeed, of more than 200 male leaders who lost jobs due to involvement in Me Too scandals, an impressive number of their replacements were women. (This number is especially notable given the small number of women in secular leadership roles.)

There are evidence-based reasons to bring in a woman leader in times of crisis. Research shows that women are more likely to promote a collaborative work environment, to treat others fairly, and to exercise transformational leadership. In the wake of scandals, such qualities become even more desirable.

That said, the secular world’s pattern of appointing women after a sexual abuse crisis reflects a wider phenomenon called the glass cliff, in which women and people of color are appointed to leadership roles following any kind of debacle. This means that they’re more likely to assume such positions in precarious times. It also means they have a higher risk of failure—and if they don’t succeed, their identity can be blamed instead of the circumstances. (Fun fact: White men tend to be brought in after such occurrences, a phenomenon researchers call the savior effect.)"


Sarah Mullally breaks the Anglican Communion’s glass ceiling

All who can manage to respect the Egalitarian Christians SOP are welcome to share thoughts, experiences and opinions. :wave:
 

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,963
20,240
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,740,968.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Any woman who's been in ministry long enough has seen the way "poisoned chalices" tend to get handed to women, and the way many women take them because of lack of options.

I really hope that's not the reason Bishop Sarah was appointed to this role. But I feel for her, because she's likely to face opposition and challenges few other people would.
 
Upvote 0

RamiC

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2025
836
630
Brighton
✟36,773.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I really hope that's not the reason Bishop Sarah was appointed to this role. But I feel for her, because she's likely to face opposition and challenges few other people would.
Sarah Mullally is known for being willing to listen to dissenting opinions, so I wonder if the powers that be were hoping she could actually hold the AC, or at least most of it, together. The article says "This is one of the most fragile periods the Anglican Communion has faced since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I." What I think they saw was that whoever took the Archbishop of Canturbury position on, they would need to resemble Elizabeth 1st with whatever enabled her to pull of the Elizabethan Settlement the shortest summary that I can find of that challenge is here.

Bishop Sarah has gone straight for it with this, which includes "I am now studying The Nairobi-Cairo Proposals of the Inter-Anglican Standing Commission on Unity, Faith and Order published last year. They present a vision of Anglican life together that, rather than expecting a structural or theological uniformity, envisions space for confessional and geographical groupings set within the shared life of the Instruments of Communion."
 
Upvote 0