- Jan 7, 2024
- 7,805
- 1,017
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Then prove that the film is legitimate.
The film if watched speaks for it's self.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then prove that the film is legitimate.
As long as you're happy - before God - to call your fellow Christians liars.-I do not need to reflect on what i believe or wrote, concerning people claiming to or saying they have walked on the moon.
I don't need to.I would suggest you reflect on what you are actually believing, governmnet/man is saying they did.
Listen to his testimony and make your own mind up.Giving public talks isn’t a testament to someone’s character or belief in God. We have charlatans in the pulpit.
I don't know or care what happened during his tie at NASA.I worked for a political appointee that knew the president personally and assisted with his campaign. You will never know what happened during his time at NASA. You’ll know what he’s permitted to say and nothing more.
Religion, possibly.Religion may be a genuine response or coping mechanism. Only the Lord knows for certain.
It does not. What is the provenance of the film? Can you prove that the film is legitimate?The film if watched speaks for it's self.
Yes.I agree but his faith came whey after the moon landing
What did this NDA say?and as @bèlla said earlier NASA make them sign an NDA.
Well you did.So who knows what Charles said is the whole truth as before becoming a Christian
BEFORE becoming a Christian.as before becoming a Christian he was prone to greed & money.
That is exactly what the NDA was for. Going to the moon was fully public knowledge including the pictures from the moon and inside the lem and the csm.What did this NDA say?
How do you know it wasn't to promise that they would never reveal technical details (about the rocket, etc) so that the Russians wouldn't get hold of them?
Can you prove that the film is legitimate?
Again, provide the provenance that proves this film legit. For all you know this film was falsely stitched together.If it's not legit, what the heck was Buzz, Neil & Collins doing up there on the day they should have been halfway to the moon ?
Specifically, trade secrets, in-house technology, etc.It’s a non disclosure agreement. They’re legal vehicles designed to prevent the person from sharing information the other would prefer to remain undisclosed.
So by your own admission such an NDA as you claim the astronauts would have been under would simply not hold up in courtThey hold up in court save where crimes are concerned. In that case you’re allowed to talk and testify.
But of course you have no evidence the astronauts were under any such NDA.They’re frequently employed by wealthy and powerful persons or entities.
So you have clear evidence of when and where the footage was filmed, and that it coincides with the time of their lunar mission? I'd really love to see that evidence.If it's not legit, what the heck was Buzz, Neil & Collins doing up there on the day they should have been halfway to the moon ?
It certainly does. It says, "I am a cobbled together piece of nonsense, created to push an idiots' conspiracy theory". That came across loud and clear.The film if watched speaks for it's self.
Again, provide the provenance that proves this film legit. For all you know this film was falsely stitched together.
Not really. Most legitimate videos have provenance including who and where it was taken. The video you cite has no provenance whatsoever.You can say this about any video.
Or perhaps this is another case of you speaking from your sphincter.
No it isn't. Buzz Aldrin actually has some integrity, while you lost any you might have had long ago.My names not Buzz Aldrin![]()
No it isn't. Buzz Aldrin actually has some integrity,
An NDA is not for life but typically for a period of time after leaving the employer. My father in law had a NDA and it expired a year after he left NASA.
Specifically, trade secrets, in-house technology, etc.
So by your own admission such an NDA as you claim the astronauts would have been under would simply not hold up in court
But of course you have no evidence the astronauts were under any such NDA.
He was an engineer that was part of the team that designed the legs of the lunar module and part of the team that brought the Apollo 13 home. He worked in both the Mercury and Apollo programs.Was your father-in-law an astronaut?
Apples to orangesThey’re used by people with means all the time. Even housekeepers sign them.
No you didn't. Falsifying landing on the moon in order to justify millions of tax dollars spent would fall under fraud, which is a crime, so any NDA to hide that would be void.You may want to read it again. I addressed that.
You don't know anything. Don't pretend to speak for the rest of us.We don’t know anything. That’s the point.