Watch: CNN Cuts Tulsi Gabbard Off as She Lays Out the Inconvenient Facts of the Russia Hoax

A New Dawn said:

Does Trump act like a child sometimes? Yes, and I will call that out. And I’ll call out something I believe is a bad policy, too.

Click to expand...

This thread is about matters that concern Trump. The topic is Trump. The conversation was about Trump. The Epstein files are being debated because of Trump. Try to concern yourself with Trump when the thread is talking about nothing but Trump.

Want to discuss those rascally Democrats? Then feel free to start a thread. And please, if anyone really thinks that Trump has done nothing outlandish then they must be living in a cave somewhere. So if someone points out one of the most recent things he's done, deal with as it is without trying to excuse it and deflect from it with schoolyard level arguments.

A New Dawn said:

It’s a crime, and he elevated a criminal to an appointed position in the government.

Click to expand...

If so, then he's just following the electorate's lead. Republican voters did the same thing back in November. And Trump was actually tried and convicted when they did that, unlike that other guy.

A New Dawn said:

You seem to suggest that someone committing a crime is only a criminal if they are charged. That is patently false. He had done that activity prior to being appointed, and he did it again after he was appointed.

Click to expand...

You may want to ask some of your pro-Trump friends about the concept of "innocent until proven guilty." They were all over that back when Trump was on trial for 34 criminal fraud felonies.

-- A2SG, all of which he was convicted of, by the way, in case you missed the news....

Is Obama in cuffs yet? I thought this was meant to be serious? Not just another example of Trump's NPD at work - but a national crisis and treasonous conspiracy against his royal personage?​

Like - serious enough to forget about the Epstein files?

The Australian ABC calls it. This episode of Planet America does a bit of a deep dive into how Gabbard's team either cannot comprehend which reports about what emails they are reading, or are misrepresenting it with malicious intent to deceive. There's no other way to interpret the gobbledegook Gabbard sprouts.

I mean - they've got quotes and everything!
(Imagine contributing FACTS to a conversation like this?)