• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The ‘woke’ words Democrats should cut from their vocabulary

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
35,629
4,406
On the bus to Heaven
✟97,197.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
“Nearly 10 months after the 2024 elections, and the party is still embroiled in self-recriminations over where they’re talking, what they’re talking about and, now, the actual words they’re using. Or, more precisely: which words they shouldn’t utter.

In a new memo, shared exclusively with POLITICO, the center-left think tank Third Way is circulating a list of 45 words and phrases they want Democrats to avoid using, alleging the terms put “a wall between us and everyday people of all races, religions, and ethnicities.” It’s a set of words that Third Way suggests “people simply do not say, yet they hear them from Democrats.”

They span six categories — from “therapy speak” to “explaining away crime” — and put in sharp relief a party that authors say makes Democrats “sound like the extreme, divisive, elitist, and obfuscatory, enforcers of wokeness.” In the document, titled “Was It Something I Said?” Third Way argues that to “please the few, we have alienated the many — especially on culture issues, where our language sounds superior, haughty and arrogant,” according to the memo.

Among the blacklisted terms: privilege … violence (as in “environmental violence”) … dialoguing … triggering … othering … microaggression … holding space … body shaming … subverting norms … systems of oppression … cultural appropriation … Overton window … existential threat to [the climate, democracy, economy] … radical transparency … stakeholders … the unhoused … food insecurity … housing insecurity … person who immigrated … birthing person … cisgender … deadnaming … heteronormative … patriarchy … LGBTQIA+ … BIPOC … allyship … incarcerated people … involuntary confinement.

“We are doing our best to get Democrats to talk like normal people and stop talking like they’re leading a seminar at Antioch,” says Matt Bennett, Third Way’s executive vice president of public affairs. “We think language is one of the central problems we face with normie voters, signaling that we are out of touch with how they live, think and talk. In recent weeks, this has become a bit of a thing, with comedians like Jimmy Kimmel and Sarah Silvermanhighlighting how insane Dems can sometimes sound. Also, elected officials like [Delaware Rep.] Sarah McBride and [Kentucky Gov.] Andy Beshear are begging their colleagues to just be normal again.”

 

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,108
20,035
Finger Lakes
✟313,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why? The Democrats I know are normal people as are the Republicans, while the MAGAs....

This seems to be a lesson in code switching for lefties.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
35,629
4,406
On the bus to Heaven
✟97,197.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Actual memo from the left center Third Way.

“To: All Who Wish to Stop Donald Trump and MAGA

From: Third Way



TW-Divider_grey.png



For a party that spends billions of dollars trying to find the perfect language to connect to voters, Democrats and their allies use an awful lot of words and phrases no ordinary person would ever dream of saying. The intent of this language is to include, broaden, empathize, accept, and embrace. The effect of this language is to sound like the extreme, divisive, elitist, and obfuscatory, enforcers of wokeness. To please the few, we have alienated the many—especially on culture issues, where our language sounds superior, haughty and arrogant.

In reality, most Democrats do not run or govern on wildly out-of-touch social positions. But voters would be excused to believe we do because of the words that come out of our mouths—words which sound like we are hiding behind unfamiliar phrases to mask extreme intent.

Why the tortured language? After all, many Democrats are aware that the words and phrases we use can be profoundly alienating. But they use it because plain, authentic language that voters understand often rebounds badly among many activists and advocacy organizations. These activists and advocates may take on noble causes, but in doing so they often demand compliance with their preferred messages; that is how “birthing person” became a stand-in for mother or mom. And if we don’t think more carefully about our language, many in America will be banking on help from Donald Trump and Republicans, because Democratic levers of power will be few and far between.

In this memo, we are putting a spotlight on the language we use that puts a wall between us and everyday people of all races, religions, and ethnicities. These are words that people simply do not say, yet they hear them from Democrats. Over the years we’ve conducted, read, and analyzed hours upon hours of focus groups, and we’ve yet to hear a voter volunteer any of the phrases below except as a form of derision or parody of Democrats. We’re not talking about techno-speak, like net-zero and climate resiliency. Those words put up their own Ivy League walls between policymakers and voters. Here we are focusing on the eggshell dance of political correctness which leaves the people we aim to reach cold or fearful of admonishment.”

Continues below.

 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,921
4,520
82
Goldsboro NC
✟266,129.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Actual memo from the left center Third Way.

“To: All Who Wish to Stop Donald Trump and MAGA

From: Third Way



TW-Divider_grey.png



For a party that spends billions of dollars trying to find the perfect language to connect to voters, Democrats and their allies use an awful lot of words and phrases no ordinary person would ever dream of saying. The intent of this language is to include, broaden, empathize, accept, and embrace. The effect of this language is to sound like the extreme, divisive, elitist, and obfuscatory, enforcers of wokeness. To please the few, we have alienated the many—especially on culture issues, where our language sounds superior, haughty and arrogant.

In reality, most Democrats do not run or govern on wildly out-of-touch social positions. But voters would be excused to believe we do because of the words that come out of our mouths—words which sound like we are hiding behind unfamiliar phrases to mask extreme intent.
No, but they have a regrettable tendency to use the academic language they learned at school when speaking publically.
Why the tortured language? After all, many Democrats are aware that the words and phrases we use can be profoundly alienating. But they use it because plain, authentic language that voters understand often rebounds badly among many activists and advocacy organizations. These activists and advocates may take on noble causes, but in doing so they often demand compliance with their preferred messages; that is how “birthing person” became a stand-in for mother or mom. And if we don’t think more carefully about our language, many in America will be banking on help from Donald Trump and Republicans, because Democratic levers of power will be few and far between.
They can't help it. They are elitists, after all, even if they mean well.
In this memo, we are putting a spotlight on the language we use that puts a wall between us and everyday people of all races, religions, and ethnicities. These are words that people simply do not say, yet they hear them from Democrats. Over the years we’ve conducted, read, and analyzed hours upon hours of focus groups, and we’ve yet to hear a voter volunteer any of the phrases below except as a form of derision or parody of Democrats. We’re not talking about techno-speak, like net-zero and climate resiliency. Those words put up their own Ivy League walls between policymakers and voters. Here we are focusing on the eggshell dance of political correctness which leaves the people we aim to reach cold or fearful of admonishment.”

Continues below.

And they are speaking to people whose religious and political leaders have tried to teach them to be anti-intellectual and mistrustful of academic learning.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,319
17,073
Here
✟1,473,200.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I thought Trump supporters made up the word woke.

Actually, it was lingo used almost exclusively in progressive activism circles for a few years.


It wasn't until conservatives started using it ironically as a pejorative that there was an effort by people to distance themselves from the expression.

It went from "word of the year" (that people proudly put on their protest signs in 2017)

To AOC hopping on Twitter to rip on James Carville by saying:

"Woke is a term almost exclusively used by older people these days. The average audience for people seriously using the word woke in a 2021 political discussion are James Carville and Fox News pundits,” the congresswoman wrote on Twitter. “So that should tell you all you need to know.”
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,490
20,776
Orlando, Florida
✟1,516,627.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Third Way? More tone policing, this time in a more folksy register? I am guessing the irony is not lost here...

I think we can do better than listen to the people that brought us Clintonomics. That's the real reason Democrats keep losing, they've eroded the basis of trust through their actions, not just their words.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
36,191
20,788
29
Nebraska
✟768,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Why? The Democrats I know are normal people as are the Republicans, while the MAGAs....

This seems to be a lesson in code switching for lefties.
I agree most (moderate) Republican and Democratic folks are simple, regular folk.

I wouldn't compare them to MAGAs....

If I am understanding you, correctly....???
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
36,191
20,788
29
Nebraska
✟768,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
36,191
20,788
29
Nebraska
✟768,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I thought Trump supporters made up the word woke.
No. I see some liberal friends of mine who wear that word with pride.

If I understand correctly, it originally came from the African American Community that is now used in politics.

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Upvote 0

Palmfever

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 5, 2019
1,165
687
Hawaii
✟318,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Seriously tho author is probably right. Americans are vibe oriented and distracted by the superficial. We need to work with that.
An opinion. Check out the article. It makes a good point.
...
”When therapy validates grievance instead of dismantling it, the mindset spreads. It shows up in schools, workplaces, politics and the streets. Social media then amplifies it, rewarding outrage, magnifying slights and creating echo chambers where grievance is not just validated, it is weaponized.
The more personal and emotional the grievance is, the more followers it draws. And when people see their own frustrations reflected in someone like Mangione, they project their anger onto him and reinterpret his alleged actions as justice.

The danger is obvious. When grievance is elevated over morality, the threshold for acceptable behavior collapses. Harming others becomes a legitimate response to feeling wronged. Public safety erodes. Shared norms vanish. And in the vacuum, each person decides which rules apply to them and which do not

We cannot keep pretending this is harmless venting. The glorification of Mangione shows just how far grievance culture has gone. If we do not reverse course, we will see more alleged criminals turned into symbols, more mobs fueled by outrage, and more ordinary people convinced their anger is a license to harm.

The way back is simple: restore resilience and personal responsibility as cultural values. Therapists must stop feeding victim narratives and start teaching coping skills. Schools should teach grit alongside empathy. Politicians must reject grievance-based policymaking. And each of us must resist the temptation to excuse bad behavior simply because we relate to the grievance behind it.

Mangione’s alleged crime may be shocking, but the celebration of it is worse. It shows that the mindset which excuses, and sometimes cheers, lawlessness is already here. Unless we push back, this culture will keep making folk heroes out of criminals, and America’s unraveling will continue one "justified" act at a time.”

 
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,725
22,384
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟592,224.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
It is imperative that Democrats start talking like their political opponents demand, so that their political opponents can find something new to denounce them on.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,921
4,520
82
Goldsboro NC
✟266,129.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
It is imperative that Democrats start talking like their political opponents demand, so that their political opponents can find something new to denounce them on.
It just means adapting to a smaller vocabulary and less background knowledge. And no, that is not a derogatory remark, it's a fact. I am a workforce development trainer (retd) and I have been doing it successfully for years. And you don't have to do all that much code shifting but you have to be talking at, not talking down.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: public hermit
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,678
4,426
Midlands
Visit site
✟760,908.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It is truly bizarre that the Democrat party has declared half the country to be its enemy, and yet thinks they are going to win elections.
I mean, I say let them plow on. Double down on hating America and calling Americans terrible names and accusing them of absurd things. Seriously, it will all come down in the Conservatives' favor. They are on the wrong side of everything, with a vengeance.
 
Upvote 0

comana

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 19, 2005
7,912
4,468
Colorado
✟1,116,090.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It is truly bizarre that the Democrat party has declared half the country to be its enemy, and yet thinks they are going to win elections.
I mean, I say let them plow on. Double down on hating America and calling Americans terrible names and accusing them of absurd things. Seriously, it will all come down in the Conservatives' favor. They are on the wrong side of everything, with a vengeance.
It worked for Trump.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: durangodawood
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,678
4,426
Midlands
Visit site
✟760,908.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It worked for Trump.
That does not even make sense. If he had alienated half the nation, he would not have won. That is why Hillary lost and Biden's own party kicked him to the curb in 2024. If this trend continues, the midterms are going to be a disaster for the Democrats. You cannot attack your own voters and expect to win.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

comana

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 19, 2005
7,912
4,468
Colorado
✟1,116,090.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That does not even make sense. If he had alienated half the nation, he would not have won. That is why Hillary lost and Biden's own party kicked him to the curb in 2024. If this trend continues, the midterms are going to be a disaster for the Democrats. You cannot attack your own voters and expect to win.
Only half voted for him, so yes, it does make sense. He just got the right votes in the right states to win.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,319
17,073
Here
✟1,473,200.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think we can do better than listen to the people that brought us Clintonomics. That's the real reason Democrats keep losing, they've eroded the basis of trust through their actions, not just their words.

What, exactly, is your major objection to "Clintonomics"? (I assume you're referring to Bill and not Hillary -- and by people who brought that, you're referring to Carville?) While I'd admit that Carville's advice is a little stale (he got quite a bit of mileage out of that 'it's the economy stupid' quote...but that's not determining wins and losses to the degree it used to)

By most available metrics, it would appear that economy under Bill Clinton was fairly stable.

- GDP growth under him was better than had been since 1970
- He still holds the record for job creation (22.7 million new non-farm/non-government payroll jobs added - about 236,000 jobs per month on average - the fastest for any presidential term).
- Inflation went from 6% down to 2.6%
- Unemployment halved
- Tax revenues up, federal spending down (it was the last time we had a surplus)
- Welfare rolls dropped, home ownership rate per capita increased by 5%


The reason they're losing has nothing to do with "being too much like Bill Clinton"... if modern day Democrats were more like Bill Clinton, they'd be winning. (socially moderate, economically a touch left of center)

Kamala Harris caught on to what the problem is that the democrats have, but she did it about 2 months too late. Politico (I believe it was them, but perhaps it was HuffPo) did a piece about it entitled "Harris pivots towards patriotism" -- in which they detailed how she attempted to distance herself from the extremes, and started projecting the message that it's okay liberals to wave the American flag, be proud of their country, and all of the great things America has done. It was just too little too late.

Which, ironically enough, is the approach Bill Clinton used to win over the moderates... it was what became known in "politics talk" as the "Sister Souljah Moment"

That moment where you publicly stand up to the more radical element of your own base in order to signal to the independents/moderates and the other side that you're not going to be captured by the extremes.


Whenever I see progressive people try to dissect it and determine "why are we not winning", they're overthinking it.

"It's because she didn't signal enough to the blue collar workers that she'd fight for more pro-union policies"
"It's because she didn't signal enough that she would stand up to the big banks and the corporate CEOs"
"It's because her voting record didn't sufficiently demonstrate that she'd prioritize the workers over the investor class"


None of that is the reason why she lost....

Bill Clinton did none of those things, and he cruised to victory twice.
Obama gave it a C+ (and that may be being generous) effort in regards to those things, he cruised to victory twice.


I like Bill Maher's quote about it "You're pandering to people who are even crazier than the person you're running against. You lost a crazy contest against an actual crazy person"
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: john23237
Upvote 0