- Jan 7, 2024
- 7,738
- 997
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
The answer is simple: don't merely make statements with no evidence to back them up.
But I do have evidence, God's evidence.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The answer is simple: don't merely make statements with no evidence to back them up.
And "wandering star" is what the word "planet" comes from, two Greek words meaning "wandering" and "star." So now you do believe in planets?
What is God's evidence that galaxies don't exist, that Venus is not a planet (even though "planet" comes from the Greek for wandering star, and you believe in wandering stars), and all the other conspiracy theories you believe in?But I do have evidence, God's evidence.
I refer you back to my earlier post, where I mentioned that other astronomers who have no connection to NASA take photos of planets. I even posted a photo of the moon and Venus taken by a photographer in Shropshire.Not as NASA portrays them.
I refer you back to my earlier post, where I mentioned that other astronomers who have no connection to NASA take photos of planets. I even posted a photo of the moon and Venus taken by a photographer in Shropshire.
How do NASA's photos of planets differ from those of other photographers?It's not the way NASA portrays them.
How do NASA's photos of planets differ from those of other photographers?
As do we all.I believe in the word of of God.
Yes - it says nothing about teaching science, astronomy or so that you might know the shape of the earth.King James Bible
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
Don't be silly.But I do have evidence, God's evidence.
The KJV mentions planets.It's not the way NASA portrays them. They portray them as planets in our so called solar system, one big lie.
Pluto is no longer considered a planet anyway, but who took the two pictures? Are you suggesting that Pluto has two eyes like the right-hand picture seems to? I know you put a laughing Emoji in your post, so I'm not taking it too seriously.
The King James Version (KJV) does not directly mention the word "planets," as the concept of planets as distinct celestial bodies was not understood by the people who wrote the Bible. However, biblical texts refer to "wandering stars" and potentially names like Chiun and Meni, which some commentators interpret as referring to planets, particularly Saturn. The Bible focuses on the Earth and the visible "lights" in the sky for signs, seasons, and days, viewing them from an Earth-centered perspective.The KJV mentions planets.
2 Kings 23:5.The King James Version (KJV) does not directly mention the word "planets,"
as the concept of planets as distinct celestial bodies was not understood by the people who wrote the Bible.
These are the names of idols.
The Bible focuses on GOD - is nature, his will, his plan, his salvation and his desire for a relationship with us.The Bible focuses on the Earth
YesThey are, do you really believe that all these pictures of the universe are real, do you really believe there are billions of stars & other Galaxies & planets that can be landed upon like Mars ?
NASA is not hiding God instead they are highlighting His creation.If so there's nothing more I can say to you to convince you that NASA is hiding God as this is all the evidence.
Yes
NASA is not hiding God instead they are highlighting His creation.
Like the ones that Dean Odle presents to you.Yes, by presenting everyone with fairy tales.
No fairy tales. All evidence regarding planets is voluminous and well attested. You ignoring it at your own peril does not in any way refute what is obvious.Yes, by presenting everyone with fairy tales.
No fairy tales. All evidence regarding planets is voluminous and well attested. You ignoring it at your own peril does not in any way refute what is obvious.
It is fact that the moon rock that was given to the prime minister of the Netherlands by Buzz Aldrin was pertrified wood.
It was initially displayed at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam as a prized possession. However, investigations revealed it was not from the moon, but rather a piece of petrified wood, likely from Arizona.
Yes, really.Oh please, really ........
![]()