Another look at the moon landing.

[Apple Sky]

The answer is simple: don't merely make statements with no evidence to back them up.

But I do have evidence, God's evidence.

 

[Apple Sky]

And "wandering star" is what the word "planet" comes from, two Greek words meaning "wandering" and "star." So now you do believe in planets?

Not as NASA portrays them.

 

[David Lamb]

But I do have evidence, God's evidence.

What is God's evidence that galaxies don't exist, that Venus is not a planet (even though "planet" comes from the Greek for wandering star, and you believe in wandering stars), and all the other conspiracy theories you believe in?

 

[David Lamb]

Not as NASA portrays them.

I refer you back to my earlier post, where I mentioned that other astronomers who have no connection to NASA take photos of planets. I even posted a photo of the moon and Venus taken by a photographer in Shropshire.

 

[Apple Sky]

I refer you back to my earlier post, where I mentioned that other astronomers who have no connection to NASA take photos of planets. I even posted a photo of the moon and Venus taken by a photographer in Shropshire.

It's not the way NASA portrays them. They portray them as planets in our so called solar system, one big lie.

 

[David Lamb]

It's not the way NASA portrays them.

How do NASA's photos of planets differ from those of other photographers?

 

[Apple Sky]

How do NASA's photos of planets differ from those of other photographers?

Pluto for instance;

 

[Strong in Him]

I believe in the word of of God.

As do we all.
Just not in the same way that you do.

King James Bible
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Yes - it says nothing about teaching science, astronomy or so that you might know the shape of the earth.

You believe whatever the Bible says? Good; the KJV mentions planets - deal with it.

 

[Strong in Him]

But I do have evidence, God's evidence.

Don't be silly.

If GOD had wanted to tell us the shape of the earth and how it works there would be a whole chapter on it - if not, a book.
I.E. "The earth is this shape - the moon is so many miles away - the earth revolves on its axis and around the sun" etc, etc. But it doesn't say that.
The Bible is not a science text book - didn't anyone ever tell you that?

 

[Strong in Him]

It's not the way NASA portrays them. They portray them as planets in our so called solar system, one big lie.

The KJV mentions planets.
Planets and so on existed long before NASA was even formed.

 

[David Lamb]

Pluto for instance;

View attachment 368960

Pluto is no longer considered a planet anyway, but who took the two pictures? Are you suggesting that Pluto has two eyes like the right-hand picture seems to? I know you put a laughing Emoji in your post, so I'm not taking it too seriously.

 

[Apple Sky]

The KJV mentions planets.

The King James Version (KJV) does not directly mention the word "planets," as the concept of planets as distinct celestial bodies was not understood by the people who wrote the Bible. However, biblical texts refer to "wandering stars" and potentially names like Chiun and Meni, which some commentators interpret as referring to planets, particularly Saturn. The Bible focuses on the Earth and the visible "lights" in the sky for signs, seasons, and days, viewing them from an Earth-centered perspective.

 

[Strong in Him]

The King James Version (KJV) does not directly mention the word "planets,"

2 Kings 23:5.

as the concept of planets as distinct celestial bodies was not understood by the people who wrote the Bible.

The concept of the earth revolving around the sun was not understood by those who wrote the Bible - which is what we have been trying to tell you. But your position seems to be "if it's not in the Bible (KJV) I don't believe it."

However, biblical texts refer to "wandering stars" and potentially names like Chiun and Meni,

These are the names of idols.
Did you read the links that you posted? Chiun - an idol associated with the planet Saturn; Amos 5:26, Meni - a symbol of destiny; Isaiah 65:11.

The Bible focuses on the Earth

The Bible focuses on GOD - is nature, his will, his plan, his salvation and his desire for a relationship with us.

Of course it talks about the earth rather than other planets, stars etc - we live on the earth and the Bible is not a science textbook.

 

[Hentenza]

They are, do you really believe that all these pictures of the universe are real, do you really believe there are billions of stars & other Galaxies & planets that can be landed upon like Mars ?

Yes

If so there's nothing more I can say to you to convince you that NASA is hiding God as this is all the evidence.

NASA is not hiding God instead they are highlighting His creation.

 

[Apple Sky]

Yes

NASA is not hiding God instead they are highlighting His creation.

Yes, by presenting everyone with fairy tales.

 

[Strong in Him]

Yes, by presenting everyone with fairy tales.

Like the ones that Dean Odle presents to you.

 

[Hentenza]

Yes, by presenting everyone with fairy tales.

No fairy tales. All evidence regarding planets is voluminous and well attested. You ignoring it at your own peril does not in any way refute what is obvious.

 

[Apple Sky]

No fairy tales. All evidence regarding planets is voluminous and well attested. You ignoring it at your own peril does not in any way refute what is obvious.

Oh please, really ........

NASA takes you on a tour of every planet in our solar system

There are eight planets in our solar system (sorry, Pluto), and each has a unique story. Come visit every one from mini Mercury to mysterious Neptune.

www.cnet.com

 

[Michie]

It is fact that the moon rock that was given to the prime minister of the Netherlands by Buzz Aldrin was pertrified wood.

It was initially displayed at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam as a prized possession. However, investigations revealed it was not from the moon, but rather a piece of petrified wood, likely from Arizona.

• Genuine moon rocks:
  The Apollo missions brought back about 382 kilograms of lunar samples, which are well-documented and studied by scientists.
• Fake moon rocks:
  Many samples that were distributed to nations and states were not true lunar rocks, with the petrified wood in the Netherlands being a notable example of a fake.

 

[Strong in Him]

Oh please, really ........

Yes, really.

You have no idea, do you, that by continually sniggering at real facts, you just make yourself look ridiculous.