• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,255
15,921
72
Bondi
✟375,618.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
This topic really interests me as a drummer.

For decades drum kit was imagined as just very masculine to the point that people thought it almost felt unnatural for women to be doing it. And while there were a few great woman drummers out there, most people thought them a novelty/curiosity more than musically serious. Almost like it was unseemly for women to demonstrate that much internal rhythm.

Cut to the last decade or so and the females are crushing it. At sxsw where we've showcased 3 years running, theres young bands from all over the world with gal drummers who are really good. An even when they dont show off a million skills theyre laying down punchy muscular rock parts that kick the songs with zero "gender penalty" or other imaginary problem.

Just an example in my face of reality outrunning doomed old attitudes.
I think we need some light relief from this all-too depressing thread...and with cow bells! Goes full Animal at 2:50. Yeah!

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,255
15,921
72
Bondi
✟375,618.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
...it has nothing to do with voting rights in a secular state.
The draft, feminism, Ephesians, equality, getting punched in the face (?)....all smoke and mirrors. The very first of @Oompa Loompa's arguments actually excludes him from voting (which has been ignored), hence the subsequent laundry list of other reasons.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,611
13,970
Earth
✟244,779.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Another non-answer from a deflecting liberal who refuses to accept the obvious. We are done.
You are correct that I do not wish to walk the debate-path you’ve chosen for me to travel, well spotted!
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,802
4,952
New England
✟261,518.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So another non-answer to a simple question. Again I ask, SHOULD THE WOMEN DESERVE TO FEEL OFFENDED IF A MAN DOESNT GIVE HER THEIR SEAT? The answer is either a simple Yes or No with an explanation.
One doesn’t “deserve to feel offended.” In that context, you’re using it like it’s something she’s awarded. I think you mean is she right to feel offended.

And apparently, since yes or no answers is all you can get your head around, I’ll simplify it for you. No, she shouldn’t feel offended. Chairs are first come, first serve on public transportation. If he was there first he doesn’t need to yield the seat and he doesn’t need to explain or justify it to her.

My husband: “No. I don’t think most women expect people to give them a seat.”

No liberal has yet been capable of doing so. Including you and your husband.
You have been answered multiple times, but you ignored it. Just like you demanded proof of the gender wage gap, I gave it, then you ignored it.

Actually, you conveniently ignore all the posts that are too uncomfortably close to showing your thinking is flawed.
Probably another leftist liberal.
My husband? My husband is the most far left person I know. I think he tested out as the most liberal person in our group on the forum. He used to be the farthest, hardest right on all subjects. As conservative and maybe more in some respects than you. Now he’s hard, far left. This isn’t a secret… Where have you been?

Because you have proven incapable of honest discourse, we are done.
Dude, just say you’re getting schooled by a blue haired feminist, that bothers you, so now instead of facing the music, you’re taking your toys and going home. At least be honest, lol. I’m not the problem here, my guy.
 
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,872
20,145
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,713,131.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
There is nothing biblically distorted about the gender roles between the husband and wife in the video. Otherwise, I challenge you to prove otherwise.
Sure there is. Let's start with the introductory comment; "A big focus of this Christian movement is on a patriarchal society where men are dominant, and women are expected to submit to their husbands."

That is absolutely distorted. Because the Scriptural vision for marriage is of mutual submission, mutual love, and mutual service ("being subject to one another out of reverence for Christ" - Ephesians 5:21, emphasis mine.) That is the framework within which individual instances of submission occur. Not dominance and hierarchy.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,584
29,133
Pacific Northwest
✟815,023.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Sure there is. Let's start with the introductory comment; "A big focus of this Christian movement is on a patriarchal society where men are dominant, and women are expected to submit to their husbands."

That is absolutely distorted. Because the Scriptural vision for marriage is of mutual submission, mutual love, and mutual service ("being subject to one another out of reverence for Christ" - Ephesians 5:21, emphasis mine.) That is the framework within which individual instances of submission occur. Not dominance and hierarchy.

Bingo. It's even deeper--the entire biblical drama as it unfolds demonstrates that God rules from the bottom. That's the Incarnation, that's the Cross, that's the Gospel.

True strength is found in weakness.

It is not in hoarding our life to ourselves that we have it; it's by giving it away that we have our life--we live by giving ourselves away. And God demonstrates this Himself in being the One who gives Himself away, by becoming a mortal man, partaking our in our weakness, and becoming the Victim of the Cross.

In the Revelation it is not a "Caesar" like figure seated on the heavenly throne, but the Lamb that was slain.

Christianity does not operate top-down; it operates bottom-up. It always has. It's when we get this wrong and start trying to things top-down that we start to get it all wrong. Just like ancient Israel did, whenever it stopped being bottom-up and became top-down. History time and again shows that when God's People throw away God's way, which is bottom-up, and try to do things our top-down way, that's when we are doing things as the world does, and thinking with our carnal minds, and indulging the impulses of our flesh. That's where the condemnations show up, like do not be conformed to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of our minds, to have this same mind in us that was in Christ, that friendship with the world is enmity with God, etc.

God's kingdom is upside-down, it's backward, "the greatest among you is your slave".

"The Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many"

It's all there. Over and over and over again. God basically shouts it at us in Scripture.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is your opinion, and his, about what is instructed in Ephesians 5. If you want to argue with another Christian about your interpretation of Ephesians 5 you should do it in another forum, because it has nothing to do with voting rights in a secular state.

And the rest of us need not care about yours.
Then you shouldn't care about the opinion of Pete Hegseth nor the couple in the video. Yet, here you are.
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sure there is. Let's start with the introductory comment; "A big focus of this Christian movement is on a patriarchal society where men are dominant, and women are expected to submit to their husbands."

That is absolutely distorted. Because the Scriptural vision for marriage is of mutual submission, mutual love, and mutual service ("being subject to one another out of reverence for Christ" - Ephesians 5:21, emphasis mine.) That is the framework within which individual instances of submission occur. Not dominance and hierarchy.
And what about that part about the husband being "the head of the wife as christ is the head of the church" in verse 23? How do you reconcile that?
 
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,872
20,145
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,713,131.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
And what about that part about the husband being "the head of the wife as christ is the head of the church" in verse 23? How do you reconcile that?
Headship isn't about male control. It's actually about familial and household unity.
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married












Maybe it doesn’t make sense to you because you’re ill-informed on the topic or don’t understand economics, but your understanding something is not a requirement in truth.
All you have shown is that women generally make less than men because they work less than men. I asked you specifically to show me one example in which a company intentionally paid women less because they were women. Because if you show me one example, I will show you a lawsuit. Again, the gender pay gap has been busted more than my 1996 Ford Ranger.

Here let me dump a bunch of url sites that confirm what I am saying just as you have...but more efficiently.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Headship isn't about male control. It's actually about familial and household unity.
It is about leadership and voluntary submission to that leadership. Do you agree that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are ontologically equal according to the doctrine of the Holy Trinity? Yet Jesus and the Holy Spirit, although ontologically equal, voluntarily submit to the will of the Father who has established headship. You cannot have leadership without submission, and submission is not a bad thing. After all, Jesus specifically said He could do nothing except by the will of His Father. So although ontologically equal, Jesus voluntarily submitted to the will of His Father.

What I find interesting is that Paul says that he is not talking about marriage, but the relationship between Christ and the Church. Which leads me to believe that the reason God instituted marriage was to give us an example to help us understand the relationship between the Holy Trinity, and Christ and the Church.

The bottom line is that submission doesnt mean one is better than the other. Just as Jesus voluntarily submitted to the will of the Father, likewise, a wife should submit to the will of her husband as unto the Lord. Why? Because with leadership comes responsibility and accountability. After all, during the fall, who was God calling for? Adam! Men are supposed to be the priest of the home who will ultimately have to stand accountable before God for everything done, or left undone in the home. Not the wife. Therefore, the husband has the authority to lead his home.

But there is also a cooperative relationship within the Trinity. Likewise, there needs to be a cooperative relationship between a husband and wife. In the video, you see that. I dont see any oppression. I dont see any misogyny. I see a loving husband trying to biblically lead his home the best he can, and the wife is trying to voluntarily submit to the will of her husband because she trusts his leadership and respects his authority knowing he will ultimately be held accountable before God. Again, I see nothing unbiblical about the video.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,872
20,145
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,713,131.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You have an odd obsession with hypothetical blue haired feminists.
Why? Because people have done studies on this, and nature confirms it. In nature, creatures although seemingly weak, have elaborate colors to warn predators of their toxicity. Likewise, studies have shown that women with unnatural hair colors such as blue, green, and pink are tying to communicate to their potential predators that they are toxic, so dont approach me.

So yes, female feminists who have natural hair color are deemed by men as "toxic" and should not be approached. Why? Because the see men as a predator.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Therefore you must also agree that Jesus' submission to the will of His father has no reflection to His ontological equality. Therefore you must accept the fact that Jesus willfully submitted to the authority of the Father inspite of the fact that He is ontologically equal. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. If you dont like what I am saying, please refer to scripture and prove me wrong.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,787
4,433
82
Goldsboro NC
✟264,134.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Then you shouldn't care about the opinion of Pete Hegseth nor the couple in the video. Yet, here you are.
I care about the secular policies you and he are proposing. How you justify them to yourselves with respect to your religion is none of my business.
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I care about the secular policies you and he are proposing. How you justify them to yourselves with respect to your religion is none of my business.
Need I remind you that you are on a CHRISTIAN FORUM! Yet you act shocked, offended, and surprised that people are espousing CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL VALUES AND BELIEFS that contradict the secular world. Priceless. There are numerous secular forums that are currently discussing the exact same topic, but you are here, on a Christian forum. The title explicitly states "ChristianForums.com" So in light of this information, as surprisingly it may be for you, you truly have the option of staying here and respecting CHRICTIAN BIBLICAL VALUES, or going to an more secular forum. Just saying, if you do not wish to hear a "Christian proposal" about secular issues, you would do well to venture elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,872
20,145
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,713,131.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Therefore you must also agree that Jesus' submission to the will of His father has no reflection to His ontological equality.
From the Athanasian Creed:

Nothing in this trinity is before or after,
nothing is greater or smaller;
in their entirety the three persons
are coeternal and coequal with each other.

So in everything, as was said earlier,
we must worship their trinity in their unity
and their unity in their trinity.


Their unity is a unity of will as well as of essence. It was not Jesus' submission to the will of His Father, as if Jesus himself willed something different. They shared the same will.

That also is the aim for unity in marriage; not that one person abdicates their will to the will of the other, but that they learn to come to the same mind and will on important matters.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,787
4,433
82
Goldsboro NC
✟264,134.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Need I remind you that you are on a CHRISTIAN FORUM! Yet you act shocked, offended, and surprised that people are espousing CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL VALUES AND BELIEFS that contradict the secular world. Priceless.
I am neither shocked, offended nor surprised, I just oppose the policies. You must be aware, however, that because this is a Christian forum there will be Christians posters here who question the authenticity of what you call your Christian biblical values and beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
From the Athanasian Creed:

Nothing in this trinity is before or after,
nothing is greater or smaller;
in their entirety the three persons
are coeternal and coequal with each other.

So in everything, as was said earlier,
we must worship their trinity in their unity
and their unity in their trinity.


Their unity is a unity of will as well as of essence. It was not Jesus' submission to the will of His Father, as if Jesus himself willed something different. They shared the same will.

That also is the aim for unity in marriage; not that one person abdicates their will to the will of the other, but that they learn to come to the same mind and will on important matters.
As I have stated before, there is an ontological unity between the trinity. But what you are deliberately ignoring is the fact that the Son, and the Holy Spirit voluntarily submitted to the will of the Father. I understand that this is a very conflicting truth, because you, as a female priest, would be a contradiction to the written word. So as much as I understand the position you are in, and the sacrifices you have made, you as a female being a priest in unblibical. Sure, I have no issues with women being ministers in specific departments, or even preaching a sermon fome time to time, but ultimately, a man has to be the overarching authority of and church and congregation. Forgive me, although painful as it may seem, ultimately it is the men who addicted their authority to you will have to answer to God.
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,251
4,876
Louisiana
✟292,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am neither shocked, offended nor surprised, I just oppose the policies. You must be aware, however, that because this is a Christian forum there will be Christians posters here who question the authenticity of what you call your Christian biblical values and beliefs.
Sure. And I value and respect them if they can biblically back it up. However, explain to me why any Christian on a "CHRISTIAN FORUM" should be concerned about the secular beliefs of a non-christian?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.