Even if IRS OKs churches to endorse political candidates, should they?

Churches should not be involved in politics. Many American churches today serve political interests, and too many Christians look to political leaders for solutions that only Jesus Christ can provide.

Jesus clearly stated that His kingdom is not of this world. And yet...

Luke 17:21 Neither shall they say: Behold here, or behold there. For lo, the kingdom of God is within you.

IMO, if a church advocates political positions, they are not within Jesus' Church. Understand that there is a difference between making moral stands and advocating for specific parties or candidates.

It's one thing to say thus and so reflects Christian values; quite another to say that Christians should vote for a particular candidate. For one thing, the situation Christians are in would be like Roman Christians choosing between two pagan leaders. We're already at the point where Donkey and Elephant Christians ask how can any Christian vote for the other's candidate. The last thing we want or need is for Christians to become welded to a particular candidate or party.

Michie said:

Much ink has been spilled since the IRS reinterpreted the Johnson Amendment, passed by then Senator Lyndon Johnson in 1954 as he was in the midst of a bitter reelection campaign in Texas, that it should not ban “communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services” through “its usual channels of communication or matters of faith.”

The IRS statement only applied to “religious houses of worship” (churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, etc.), not other tax-exempt religious nonprofits. At the very least, however, it has been widely interpreted across the political spectrum, from right to left, that lax and episodic IRS enforcement of the pulpit endorsement role will now be reduced to virtual non-enforcement until further notice.

The most relevant question for pastors and churches, however, is how does this impact their churches, as contrasted with how it should impact their churches.

Having dealt with this issue as both a minister and a pro-life activist in every election cycle beginning in 1976, I am certain that thousands upon thousands of pastors and their congregational leadership are actively discussing and debating this IRS decision and how to respond to it.

Continued below.

Even if IRS OKs churches to endorse political candidates, should they?

I do not favor pastors or churches endorsing political parties or political candidates Why

www.christianpost.com

Click to expand...

Looks like I'll be the first dissenting opinion, strongly disagreeing with the other responses here. Assuming that tax exempt religious organizations now have free speech in political matters, consider:

We can't love others well or serve as a light to the world without caring about the culture affecting the society around us.

We can't care about the society and culture around us without caring about the government leaders exercising control over it.

Thus, if we love people and society, Christians have an obligation (when presented the privileged right) to support Godly government leaders. This is consistent with Moses being advised to "select men from all the people - men who fear God" to rule over the Israelites" (Ex 18:21).

Shouldn't a church pastor teach his congregation the sinful nature of the surrounding culture so that the Christian can defend and fight against it - be it protests, voting, or just personal influencing? I think so.

Shouldn't a church pastor be a source of truth in revealing which government leaders support or oppose Christian biblical values? I think so.

In my view, to suggest that a pastor shouldn't teach truth about a nation's leaders or that Christians shouldn't vote for Godly leaders is an untenable position if one is to care about what's going on in the world.

I would add that it's the passive nature of many Christians AND their support of ungodly government leaders that has transformed America from a Christian nation towards a secular one, specifically by enabling liberal presidential Supreme Court Justices to ban the Bible in public schools; to ban prayer in the public schools, prayer at high school graduation ceremonies, and prayer at school football games; to ban posting of the 10 Commandments in public schools and buildings; to ban Christmas nativity scenes on pubic property; to replace the teaching of Biblical creationism in public schools with evolution; to ban all sodomy laws; to legalize abortion and gay marriage; to canonize in law Jefferson's misquoted phrase "separation of church and state"; and to establish a lemon test ruling prohibiting the public support of all religion - all this opposing God and directly betraying America's Christian heritage and founding fathers' written intentions. All this by Christians voting for ungodly presidents that appoint liberal Justices, ungodly Senators, Congressmen, and local officials.

America's Christian heritage and moral values is in shambles because the majority voting block of Christians have NOT had their church pastors guiding them adequately in social culture and political affairs. So yes, I think we need a lot more of that, not less.

Sir Joseph said:

Shouldn't a church pastor be a source of truth in revealing which government leaders support or oppose Christian biblical values? I think so.

Click to expand...

For an example, the Baptists in the United States in the mid-1800s took political stands on slavery. And the denomination split in two over the question, thereby weakening the Christian community.

So we have precedent for this kind of thing.