- Oct 2, 2020
- 27,959
- 15,171
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Perhaps they should book him a room at the laughing academy.At least he has a sense of humor.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Perhaps they should book him a room at the laughing academy.At least he has a sense of humor.
Maybe, but if you tried to lock up everybody who enjoyed poking fun at your guy there wouldn't be enough room.Perhaps they should book him a room at the laughing academy.
When I was young and rather stupid I got into a bit of a drunken push and shove situation. Now I'd do anything to avoid getting into a fight but it looked like it was going to go off and I was going to get a beating. So I told the guy in no uncertain terms that this was not going to be Marquis of Queensberry rules and gave him some details of what I was prepared to do to him (not that I'd get the chance). Luckily he believed me and had second thoughts so I lived to (avoid another) fight another day.If your opponent won't fight by Marquis of Queensberry rules, you don't have to either.
“When they go low, we go high”
I'm sorry, Michelle. But not any more. Too many lines have been crossed.
The risk here is that CA voters don’t go for it and he looks silly.When I was young and rather stupid I got into a bit of a drunken push and shove situation. Now I'd do anything to avoid getting into a fight but it looked like it was going to go off and I was going to get a beating. So I told the guy in no uncertain terms that this was not going to be Marquis of Queensberry rules and gave him some details of what I was prepared to do to him (not that I'd get the chance). Luckily he believed me and had second thoughts so I lived to (avoid another) fight another day.
If you can actually see that the other guy is not 'playing by the rules' then all bets are off and anything goes. If he starts swinging a broken bottle at you then taking up a boxing stance is not going to get you anywhere, except a trip to the hospital.
The gloves have come off. If MAGA wants to play dirty then them bleating about the Dems being hypocrites because they've been complaining about the GOP tactics is laughable. If the guy is beating you with a pool cue then it's a bit rich for him to complain when you kick him in the cojones.
The risk here is that CA voters don’t go for it and he looks silly.
How is it at all possible that you completely missed the point of that post? I even gave a little anecdote to fill it out so that you'd not be confused about what I was saying. And to complain about either side not caring about rules or democracy had me cleaning cereal off my laptop these last few minutes. I mean, that was meant as a joke, wasn't it?This seems to be a tacit admission that neither side is even pretending to care about the rules or democracy any more. I guess it's good that the facade has been shattered.
How is it at all possible that you completely missed the point of that post?
And to complain about either side not caring about rules or democracy had me cleaning cereal off my laptop these last few minutes. I mean, that was meant as a joke, wasn't it?
Don't you even dare think to complain that you might eventually reap that which you have sown.
You've been waving a club studded with nails about these last few months and you now have the temerity to say 'Hey, that's not fair. He just swung a punch at me'.
Came as a bit of a shock to you, did it? That says a lot.
It's time to take the gloves off.I didn't. Clearly, you no longer agree that when they go low, you go high.
It's time to take the gloves off.
And please, do not give me any bulldust about the Dems doing the same.
Really, how long did you think people were just going to complain about it and do nothing. You want to play hard ball? Well, the game's on.
Absolutely they should use the same political tactics that Rs take advantage of.Or IOW, It's time for Democrats to "go low".
The current law (stupidly) favors strictly partisan gerrymandering.I don’t understand why everyone is in an uproar about this. Both plans will be tight up in court for a long time.
Complain away at your discretion. It does make for political drama entertainment.The current law (stupidly) favors strictly partisan gerrymandering.
Is there some better time than when the legislation is being being made to be upset - if the concept upsets you?
That sounds like an argument against complaining about things online generally: that its basically useless except as fun.Complain away at your discretion. It does make for political drama entertainment.
“Donald Trump, you have poked the bear and we will punch back,” Newsom, who is seen as a possible 2028 presidential contender, said at a news conference with other Democrats.
Newsom will ask legislators to call a special election for November, where voters would ratify the plan to use new maps. Currently, California uses an independent commission to draw district lines (which was also passed by voters).
Absolutely they should use the same political tactics that Rs take advantage of.
Right.
Democrats are opposed to gerrymandering, so I've heard. But not really.
FTR, this kind of rank hypocrisy plays horribly with independents. It confirms what we already knew; both parties will do whatever it takes to stay in power. The illusion that anyone cares about fair and honest elections has been completely shattered.
As Ah-nold put it, it's a race to the bottom.
Not usually. I find some issues more interesting than others. This one could get interesting if it actually happens.That sounds like an argument against complaining about things online generally: that its basically useless except as fun.
Thats pretty reasonable. But still, abstaining from political critique is not my approach, obviously. Is it yours?