Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don’t know. They cut to something else before that part of his answer.What did he say about outside the church? I'd be curious to read it.
Could you provide a source please?Senator Kirsten Gillibrand
That was super easy. I could list more, if you want.
See here and scroll to the bottom:Could you provide a source please?
I'm still waiting for you to tell me if you wouldn't mind if your wife lost her vote. It wasn't a hypothetical question.Could you provide a source please?
Imagine thinking that taking away rights is a “good thing”.https://apnews.com/article/women-hegseth-defense-secretary-religion-d962f472910fb47a0c66cd37b01f550d
In the post, Hegseth commented on an almost seven-minute-long report by CNN examining Doug Wilson, cofounder of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, or CREC. The report featured a pastor from Wilson’s church advocating the repeal of women’s right to vote from the Constitution, and another pastor saying that in his ideal world, people would vote as households. It also featured a female congregant saying that she submits to her husband.“All of Christ for All of Life,” Hegseth wrote in his post that accompanied the video.
The post:
The video is of a CNN piece interviewing Doug Wilson and other pastors from the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, with which Hegseth's church is apparently affiliated. One of the topics they broach is voting and several of them advocate returning to a system where women don't have individual votes, but rather the husband votes for his entire household. One pastor explicitly advocates for the repeal of the 19th amendment.
So, have you formed an opinion about the Christian-Nationalist who’d be happy of half the population was silenced, politically?Oh my, so non-woke.
Neither Hegseth nor Wilson say anything about women voting in video footage. And there's no quote in the article from either of them about women voting. Rather someone else said that he and his wife should reach a mutual decision on who to vote for, and as head of the family he should cast the vote. Which is just one guy's way of wanting to do things in his family.So, have you formed an opinion about the Christian-Nationalist who’d be happy of half the population was silenced, politically?
Just curious, has going to war ever been put to a referendum voted on by the citizens?If they have a vote to go to war..
Neither Hegseth nor Wilson say anything about women voting in video footage. And there's no quote in the article from either of them about women voting. Rather someone else said that he and his wife should reach a mutual decision on who to vote for, and as head of the family he should cast the vote. Which is just one guy's way of wanting to do things in his family.
So it seems to me there's some definite straw grasping going on with this.
Nobody here claimed that. But it does suggest a certain amount of sexism and undermines his ability to present himself as a fair and impartial leader.And one man's opinion is somehow supposed to allude that the Trump administration is planning on repealing the 19th amendment.
One shouldn't have to go beyond what's contained in the OP.No, there is no grasping at straws here. The CNN narrator says that Wilson holds those beliefs and then talks to two individuals from his church who share those beliefs.
Wilson himself has espoused them here (the relevant bit starts at 6:20):
The relevant bit is also quoted on the second page of this piece:
![]()
Douglas Wilson Argues That Giving Women the Right To Vote Is the Result of ‘Men Becoming Spiritual Eunuchs’
Pastor Douglas Wilson of Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho, made waves online after arguing against women’s right to vote in a video last week.churchleaders.com
Nobody here claimed that. But it does suggest a certain amount of sexism and undermines his ability to present himself as a fair and impartial leader.
I answered the question.I'm still waiting for you to tell me if you wouldn't mind if your wife lost her vote. It wasn't a hypothetical question.
Trump's cabinet is so incompetent it's hard to pick out the worst one, but this certainly moves Hegseth up in the ratings.Kr
RFK, Jr. Kristi Noem
We have Linda McMahon, Education Secretary, touring, and all the comments I've seen are things like "Is she bringing the AI steak sauce? Looking for the next Hulk Hogan?"
I can't quite figure it out, but the president is shrewd if nothing else. Maybe he chooses these people for two reasons: 1) to make himself look good (or more likely, not as awful) by comparison and 2) Cabinet members like them are easy to shift blame to and scapegoat.
And yet, that's exactly what you did when you wrote this:One shouldn't have to go beyond what's contained in the OP.
Which is just one guy's way of wanting to do things in his family.
So it seems to me there's some definite straw grasping going on with this.
Sure. If they have a vote to go to war, they should also have some skin in the game. So, selective service for the women. You want 'equality,' then get the equality you deserve. How may women would vote for a President knowing that he or she could potentially send then off to the front lines? Likely, the result would be the most hardened feminist would be making my sandwich in a 1950's outfit before they put on a military uniform.
Example:
'Selective Service' is 'the draft'. Although it's not in use, men still register for it.Didn't the US military open all combat roles to women in 2013? Which service are you referring to?
What post of yours answered that question?I answered the question.