Obama referred to DOJ for criminal charges

Hans Blaster · Wednesday at 1:00 PM

Always in His Presence said:
It is the beginning of an investigation. Just got sent over to the DOJ for criminal referral.

Opened on no predicate. There is no "there" there. First you need an actual crime and there isn't one.

Always in His Presence said:
Duh,

Please attach in writing the exact requirements you need. I will then do the same, requiring you not to use sources from the left and we will have little or nothing to post because of our personal preferences.

1. click the actual MSN link opening the article on the original website
2. copy a clean URL for the original article (not MSN)
3. Paste it to a CF post.

Always in His Presence said:
Curiosity, you would prefer information NOT from a Christian website, yet here you are on a Christian website?

Doesn’t make sense

I don't think this site is a news source. And my issue was that it was a Christian *NATIONALIST* source, not that it was a Christian source.

essentialsaltes · Wednesday at 1:07 PM

Say it aint so said:
Which requires the expression of particular crimes. What are the crimes?

The phrase "treasonous conspiracy" left the lips of DNI Gabbard in the OP.

Say it aint so · Wednesday at 1:11 PM

essentialsaltes said:
The phrase "treasonous conspiracy" left the lips of DNI Gabbard in the OP.

We are living in upside down ville.

Always in His Presence · Wednesday at 1:11 PM

Say it aint so said:
Which requires the expression of particular crimes. What are the crimes?

How can you assign a crime BEFORE the criminal investigation takes place?

This isn’t the Democrats investigating.

Hans Blaster · Wednesday at 1:14 PM

Always in His Presence said:
How can you assign a crime BEFORE the criminal investigation takes place?

How criminal investigation works:

1. Get a report of a crime
2. Investigate crime to see who done it.
3. Identify evidence that secures proof of guilt to take to trial.

They haven't IDed a crime yet, only a "perp". That is backwards.

Always in His Presence said:
This isn’t the Democrats investigating.

There is no "investigation" here, just gaslighting.

iluvatar5150 · Wednesday at 1:18 PM

Say it aint so said:
May want to read your articles. That's the same "scoop" from last Friday, aka, nothing warranting criminal referrals.
Again, you are being asked:

Read it? lol, why would anybody do that? It's so much easier to be angry and ignorant.

Yarddog · Wednesday at 1:33 PM

Always in His Presence said:
"Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people," Gabbard had posted to X on Friday regarding the criminal referral. "No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The integrity of our democratic republic depends on it. We are turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral."

Sad that she would listen to a criminal President and lie for him to deflect attention away from Epstein for him.

Hans Blaster · Wednesday at 1:41 PM

Yarddog said:
Sad that she would listen to a criminal President and lie for him to deflect attention away from Epstein for him.

Trump and Epstein aren't even the worst people she's made excuses for.

BCP1928 · Wednesday at 2:11 PM

Always in His Presence said:
How can you assign a crime BEFORE the criminal investigation takes place?

This isn’t the Democrats investigating.

Not a problem. Trump has proclaimed in unequivocal well-defined terms that "Obama is guilty of treason." See how easy that was?

Always in His Presence · Wednesday at 2:35 PM

From our friendly AI:

as of today -

On July 23, 2025, a major development shook the political landscape in the U.S. as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified a trove of documents alleging that the Obama administration orchestrated a false intelligence narrative about Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Key Allegations

The 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which claimed Russia favored Trump, was allegedly based on substandard intelligence and politically motivated directives from senior officials including then-President Obama.
Gabbard stated that Obama, CIA Director John Brennan, and others knowingly promoted false claims, including the use of the discredited Steele Dossier.
The documents suggest that Putin was actually preparing for a Clinton victory, contradicting the narrative that he supported Trump.

essentialsaltes · Wednesday at 2:42 PM

Always in His Presence said:
The documents suggest that Putin was actually preparing for a Clinton victory, contradicting the narrative that he supported Trump.

That's funny. I was actually preparing for a Trump victory although my narrative was that I supported Kamala Harris. This is not a contradiction.

essentialsaltes · Wednesday at 2:46 PM

Trump's intelligence chiefs try to rewrite the history of the 2016 election

Five years ago, Marco Rubio said there was "irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling.” Now, Tulsi Gabbard says that claim is “treasonous" and should be criminally investigated.

a bipartisan Senate investigation in 2020 and a recent CIA review both found that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, launching a disinformation campaign designed to damage Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s candidacy.

A three-year investigation by special counsel John Durham reported no criminal conspiracy by Obama administration officials to sabotage Trump, and Durham filed no charges against CIA officials.

Distraction from Epstein case

Oompa Loompa · Wednesday at 3:37 PM

NxNW said:
So exactly what fake evidence did Obama manufacture?

BCP1928 · Wednesday at 4:41 PM

I certainly hope they have the guts to bring this to trial. It will be the most fun we've had with politics in decades.

Always in His Presence · Wednesday at 6:27 PM

essentialsaltes said:
That's funny. I was actually preparing for a Trump victory although my narrative was that I supported Kamala Harris. This is not a contradiction.

Are you Barack Hussein Obama or Putin?

Say it aint so · Wednesday at 6:40 PM

Always in His Presence said:
How can you assign a crime BEFORE the criminal investigation takes place?

This isn’t the Democrats investigating.

Oh....my....goodness.

Say it aint so · Wednesday at 6:49 PM

First is was Hillary was going to be arrested.
Then it was Biden was going to be arrested.
Then it was were going to release the Epstein files.
Now it's Obama is going to jail for, what did they say? "treasonous conspiracy"

Trump, the GOP, are akin to Lucy. And the MAGA hats are just Charlie Brown all day long
When will they ever get tired of constantly being, not only duped, but constantly having to navigate cognitive dissonance.

essentialsaltes · Wednesday at 6:52 PM

Say it aint so said:
Oh....my....goodness.

Only Tulsi Gabbard has the brains to hold a fishing expedition in her very own aquarium.

Hey, DOJ, I assert there are any number of fish of various species in my aquarium. Let us know if you discover any.

wing2000 · Wednesday at 7:03 PM

essentialsaltes said:
Only Tulsi Gabbard has the brains to hold a fishing expedition in her very own aquarium.

Yea, she obviously is so much smarter than the people who wrote:
1) 2019 Justice Department inspector general report;
2) bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee issued in 2020 by a GOP-controlled Senate;
3) 2023 report released by special counsel John Durham;
4). The Muller Report

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/politics/read-the-mueller-report/?itid=lk_inline_manual_9

And don't forget, the Russia invasion was NATO's fault.

Bradskii · Wednesday at 8:42 PM

Always in His Presence said:
How can you assign a crime BEFORE the criminal investigation takes place?

Just...what? I can't believe that you just asked that.

Obama referred to DOJ for criminal charges

On August Recess

Fact-Based Lifeform

Well-Known Member

Jesus is the only Way

On August Recess

Well-Known Member

Senior Contributor

On August Recess

Well-Known Member

Jesus is the only Way

Fact-Based Lifeform

Fact-Based Lifeform

Trump's intelligence chiefs try to rewrite the history of the 2016 election​

Distraction from Epstein case​

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Jesus is the only Way

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Fact-Based Lifeform

E pluribus unum

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

Similar threads

Trump's intelligence chiefs try to rewrite the history of the 2016 election

Distraction from Epstein case