Obama referred to DOJ for criminal charges

[Always in His Presence]

Trying to paper over the Epstein billboard with every little scrap they can scrounge up.

Denial is the first sign of being in a crisis position with no logical way out.

 

[durangodawood]

Denial is the first sign of being in a crisis position with no logical way out.

No it isnt.

 

[BCP1928]

So what happens next? After all the accusations I want a real indictment and a trial.

 

[Say it aint so]

"NEWLY-DECLASSIFIED DOC shows DOJ Inspector Gen concluded the Comey-run FBI FAILED 2 conduct a thorough + complete investigation into Clinton email scandal Comey & his team ate up Steele Dossier lies + chased after Russia collusion hoax but took kid gloves approach on Clinton," Grassley posted Monday.​

Didn't the Clinton nonsense get a special prosecutor for 6+ years and he came up with the same bupkis? Yes, a rhetorical question.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Reading comprehension skills have really gone downhill lately. You hate to see it.

No, they’ve always been this bad.

 

[Hans Blaster]

I already have. I quoted it gave you the link. Your reply was it was something already known.

Which post is that in? I've seen no post that would meet those criteria in this thread.

I mentioned that it was certain classified until three days ago and how did you know.

I have knarly powers. I can see through redactions...

You completely ignored that.

Nope.

 

[eclipsenow]

So what happens next? After all the accusations I want a real indictment and a trial.

That's the trick!

People who think Trump's outbursts about "Obamna" have anything to do with reality need to get back to us in 6 weeks and tell us if the DOJ even tried to lodge it in court.

If they do not?​

That's the regime admitting by their inaction it was never serious. Just more noise into the ether. Which means we know they're stalling, covering, playing for time, cynically diverting attention. And don't seem to care that in this environment of online echo chambers and heighted tension - they're probably inciting some foaming-at-the-mouth sort to actually take matters into his own hands to solve the Obama problem once and for all!

If they do?​

It is so absurd and unfounded the judges will laugh it out of court. The evidence for the Russian involvement has been well documented and is overwhelming. The evidence that Obama withheld imaginary counterfactuals? Oh give us a break!

The worst part? The fact that Trump has been diagnosed by over 230 mental health experts with malignant narcissism means he would just love someone to 'solve' the Obama problem for him. With regular variety narcissism - the narcissist must win and be adored by everyone. The malignant narcissist starts with needing that, but also enjoys hurting as many people as they can in the process! Sadly - I'm not even saying Trump is evil. Not in the sense of someone in their right mind choosing to do all this. He's disordered. He's incapable of anything else. He cannot help himself. He should not have been allowed in that room in the first place!

The American political process needs some sort of compulsory mental-health-evaluation safeguard law for these highest positions of power to prevent this situation from ever happening again.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Anything to prove this beyond cause you say so?

The obviousness of it all. Plus that the "new charges" talk is without any actual evidence.

 

[ozso]

For entertainment purposes only

 

[Say it aint so]

For entertainment purposes only

If that red play button was a red clown nose, you would be on to something.

 

[eclipsenow]

If that red play button was a red clown nose, you would be on to something.

That - and your Mencken quote gets me every time!

 

[Always in His Presence]

If that red play button was a red clown nose, you would be on to something.

yup - it would mean she was still a Democrat.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

yup - it would mean she was still a Democrat.

Oh, now she’s not a Dem?

 

[Say it aint so]

yup - it would mean she was still a Democrat.

Speaking of which, have you articulated those potential crimes yet? I mean this is page 6 now.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Gabbard Declassifies Eerie Email Exchange Over Steele Dossier FOIA - 'We Have a Problem'​

On Friday, Gabbard released a slew of information regarding how the intelligence community viewed Russian interference in the race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the last days of Barack Obama's administration. An initial Presidential Daily Brief found that there was little evidence of serious interference and that it "did not impact recent U.S. election results" via cyberattacks.​

​

​

 

[Say it aint so]

Gabbard Declassifies Eerie Email Exchange Over Steele Dossier FOIA - 'We Have a Problem'​

On Friday, Gabbard released a slew of information regarding how the intelligence community viewed Russian interference in the race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the last days of Barack Obama's administration. An initial Presidential Daily Brief found that there was little evidence of serious interference and that it "did not impact recent U.S. election results" via cyberattacks.​

​

​

May want to read your articles. That's the same "scoop" from last Friday, aka, nothing warranting criminal referrals.
Again, you are being asked:

 

[Hans Blaster]

Gabbard Declassifies Eerie Email Exchange Over Steele Dossier FOIA - 'We Have a Problem'​

On Friday, Gabbard released a slew of information regarding how the intelligence community viewed Russian interference in the race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the last days of Barack Obama's administration. An initial Presidential Daily Brief found that there was little evidence of serious interference and that it "did not impact recent U.S. election results" via cyberattacks.​

​

​

Could you at least link to the original articles? MSN is just an agregator. That way we'd know that it comes from the Christian Nationalist site "Western Journal".

 

[Always in His Presence]

Again, you are being asked:

It is the beginning of an investigation. Just got sent over to the DOJ for criminal referral.

Duh,

Could you at least link to the original articles? MSN is just an agregator. That way we'd know that it comes from the Christian Nationalist site "Western Journal".

Please attach in writing the exact requirements you need. I will then do the same, requiring you not to use sources from the left and we will have little or nothing to post because of our personal preferences.

Curiosity, you would prefer information NOT from a Christian website, yet here you are on a Christian website?

Doesn’t make sense

 

[DaisyDay]

Could you at least link to the original articles? MSN is just an agregator. That way we'd know that it comes from the Christian Nationalist site "Western Journal".

Feels like a Rick roll, eh? But it is a couple of extra steps to link to the actual source so I don't think it is deliberate.

 

[Say it aint so]

It is the beginning of an investigation. Just got sent over to the DOJ for criminal referral.

Duh,

Which requires the expression of particular crimes. What are the crimes?