-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Trump doesn't want anymore support from those who push the "Jeffery Epstein Hoax"
- Thread starter Canuckster
- Start date
NxNW
Well-Known Member
Wall Street Journal: Birthday letter to Epstein bore Trump’s signature, drawing of naked woman
CNN — A collection of letters gifted to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003 included a note bearing Donald Trump’s name and an outline of a naked woman, according to a Wall Street Journal report published Thursday. The drawing, depicting a woman’s [upper torso] and a “Donald” signature in the place of [genitals], surrounded several lines of typewritten text, according to the newspaper, which reviewed the letter. It concluded with the line: “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.” Trump in an interview with the Journal on Tuesday denied that he wrote the letter or drew the picture and threatened to sue the newspaper if it published the story. “I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women,” he said, according to the Journal. “It’s not my language. It’s not my words". At press time, Trump was denying that he knew how to write.OK, I made up that last sentence.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the letter bearing Trump’s name was included in a birthday album assembled by Ghislaine Maxwell, a close Epstein associate who was convicted of child sex trafficking in connection with Epstein. She collected the letters from Trump and dozens of others for Epstein’s 50th birthday, the Journal reported.
Upvote
0
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.” - Jean-Paul Sartre
Upvote
0
Whatever in the world would possess you to have faith in me? I'm a pseudo-anonymous poster on an internet messaging board. I could be anyone, posting for any number of motivations. I could even be multiple people in this very thread.
Globalist is a phrase that comes up frequently in my media diet. I'm familiar with it and its usages, because I listen to and read media that discusses the sorts of people that use it as a phrase when promoting conspiracies. I know (((what it means))). Just like when people start ranting about Soros, or the Rothschilds, or the cosmopolitan elite, or bankers, or start "noticing" things.
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2022
- 542
- 212
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
You posted a misleading quote from the article in part saying, "Trump went on to suggest that all of the files from the federal investigation into his late friend, the convicted sex offender Epstein…"
That gave all readers a misleading impression that Trump said in that interview “Epstein was my late friend.” which misleadingly indicates Trump said Epstein was still his friend after his death even knowing he was a pedophile.
When I pointed that out and asked you to “Give me a link to an interview of Trump saying ‘Epstein was my late friend’ (meaning “my friend” after his death) you misleadingly replied by providing info from what he said about Epstein 2 years ago when he was still alive, which at that time he had no idea Epstein was a pedophile.
And what Trump "literally says" in that interview, “All they have to do is put out anything credible. But that was run by the Biden administration for 4 years. I can imagine what they've put in the files”, is not even close to the misleading quote you posted from the article claiming Trump said, “the files from… Epstein, should not be released because they might include false information about [me] planted there by [my] Democratic rivals.'
All you’re doing is continuing to post misleading garbage as “facts” in support of misleading garbage you posted as "facts" that I gotta keep sifting through, without the aid of your friend Mr. Google.
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2022
- 542
- 212
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
That's for a topic in another thread... and I've already covered that in other threads... If the subject comes up again in the appropriate forum I may jump on board again and we can have it out then: Globalism vs Nationalism. It will no doubt be sent by moderators to the conspiracy forum. I'm sure a lot of your familiar globalists' comrades will jump in as well outnumbering me by seven to one, but that's OK... I'm used to that.
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2022
- 542
- 212
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
"The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn’t print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I’m going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
DJT 3 hrs ago
DJT 3 hrs ago
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2022
- 542
- 212
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
It confirms what I've been saying... this is a leftists initiated operation, in cooperation with "right-wing" influencers, to divide MAGA. While this operation is used to divide MAGA, it's inadvertently exposing those influencers on the right who feign loyalty to Trump. As I said earlier, leftists wear attire of the entire political spectrum.
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2022
- 542
- 212
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2022
- 542
- 212
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
- Oct 2, 2020
- 27,262
- 14,898
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Yes that's correct. But a lot of people are convinced that he'll override that as dictator and stay in office for life.
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2022
- 542
- 212
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
From Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll
"This destroys the entire Epstein narrative against Trump:
•You can’t claim someone’s hiding evidence when they’re demanding it all be released
•Grand jury testimony is the most serious, sworn evidence possible
•He’s asking for EVERYTHING, not just what makes him look good.
Perfect timing after exposing the WSJ fake documents - now he’s saying “fine, you want Epstein evidence? Let’s see ALL of it, under oath.”
Trump knows he’s clean, so he’s going full transparency. Checkmate."
https://x.com/TruthAnswersAll/status/1946021623930249561
Upvote
0
Bradskii
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
- Aug 19, 2018
- 23,028
- 15,625
- 72
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
Please...don't post nonsense. 'All readers' know full well that anyone who knew Epstein made absolutely sure that they rejected any insinuations that they were still friendly with him after it was found out what he had done. And that obviously included Trump. What should concern you is why he's been so worried about the files being released.
Oh, sorry. I forgot. It's the Tyranny of The Global Elitists® who have found some way of adding salacious details about him in those files. I mean really....we're meant to take that seriously? I think there's still an outside chance that you're having a laugh at our expense. Surely nobody can actually take this seriously.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
