Trump doesn't want anymore support from those who push the "Jeffery Epstein Hoax"

Akita Suggagaki · Wednesday at 9:15 PM

Canuckster said:
If there was a "list" incriminating Dems in those files the former FBI would have destroyed it. And if there was a "list" incriminating Trump and repubs they for certain would have released it before and during the election.

Possibly true. So show what they got anyway and resolve the big stink in the MAGAsphere so they can be one big unhappy dysfunctional family again.

Canuckster · Wednesday at 9:43 PM

Bradskii said:
Okey dokey, glad to oblige. From here: Trump says FBI should investigate ‘the Jeffrey Epstein hoax’ as a criminal conspiracy against him – live updates

'Trump went on to suggest that all of the files from the federal investigation into his late friend, the convicted sex offender Epstein, should not be released because they might include false information about him planted there by his Democratic rivals.'

This stinks to high heaven. He wanted them released. He campaigned on them being released. He promised that they would be released after he was elected. But now? If people have planted false information then it should be brought out into the open and investigated. And there are now enough Republicans wanting that to happen. From here: Republican support rolls in for legislation to release Epstein files

'Republican support is rolling in for a new legislative push in the House to direct the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release more files on the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, despite President Trump’s urging to drop the matter.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who is leading the push with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), announced on social media Wednesday that five more Republicans had signed on to co-sponsor the measure: Reps. Lauren Boebert (Colo.), Jeff Van Drew (N.J.), Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), Eric Burlison (Mo.), and Tim Burchett (Tenn.).

The Massie and Khanna legislation would require Attorney General Pam Bondi to “make publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in the possession of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Attorneys’ Offices” that have links with Epstein within 30 days of the measure becoming law.

It also says the files cannot “be withheld, delayed, or redacted” should they cause “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”

You and I both know that Trump is worried about this. And you and I both know why he is so worried. Exciting, isn't it...

Sure, Trump campaigned on them being released, but according to his own FBI/DOJ there’s nothing in them to incriminate anyone except Epstein. So now Dems and some repubs don’t believe the FBI/DOJ. They believe there’s a cover-up. So great, let Dems and some repubs get the House to push the DOJ to release everything what they got. If the FBI/DOJ are telling the truth all they’ll see is unsightly stuff incriminating Epstein… if they are not telling the truth they’ll see that there’s info that could incriminate others besides Epstein.

As for myself, I’m believing the FBI/DOJ just as Trump is; that there’s no info in those files that incriminates any other than a dead man, and that Epstein was never Trump's friend.

Canuckster · Wednesday at 9:54 PM

Akita Suggagaki said:
Possibly true. So show what they got anyway and resolve the big stink in the MAGAsphere so they can be one big happy family again.

As I mentioned... I believe what the DOJ/FBI are saying is true, the stuff is too disgusting to release, will only harm the victims, and it only incriminates a dead man. But if the House can push the DOJ to release them anyway, so be it. If I've been duped and there's all this evidence that the former FBI left in there that incriminates Dems and repubs, of course I'll accept that... But I still won't throw away everything Trump has accomplished so far and urge people to support democrats.

Trogdor the Burninator · Wednesday at 10:09 PM

Canuckster said:
You actually believe Dems are intelligent?

They're Schrodinger's conspiracists - not intelligent while simultaneously running the world media, infiltrating the Republican party and rigging elections.

NxNW · Wednesday at 10:27 PM

Canuckster said:
Epstein was never Trump's friend.

They sure hung out a lot talking about women they liked.

NxNW · Wednesday at 10:28 PM

Screenshot_20250716-194801_Adblock Browser.jpg

RileyG · Wednesday at 10:29 PM

NxNW said:
View attachment 367501

That...won't happen. AFAIK, it's not legally possible? to run for a third term?

Someone can kindly correct me if I'm wrong...?

RileyG · Wednesday at 10:30 PM

NxNW said:
They sure hung out a lot talking about women they liked.

Epstein didn't like just women...***shudder*** He was a predator.

essentialsaltes · Wednesday at 10:50 PM

Canuckster said:
And if there was a "list" incriminating Trump and repubs they for certain would have released it before and during the election.

Hey, the government has strict rules about what they can say ahead of an election.

(I mean, OK, Jim Comey can ignore that stuff if there's dirt on Hillary, but still, there are rules.)

(And for all the help he provided, he's under investigation and his daughter at DOJ got fired.)

NxNW · Wednesday at 10:52 PM

RileyG said:
That...won't happen. AFAIK, it's not legally possible? to run for a third term?

Someone can kindly correct me if I'm wrong...?

I believe "satire" is the word you're looking for.

NxNW · Wednesday at 10:53 PM

RileyG said:
Epstein didn't like just women...***shudder*** He was a predator.

I was phrasing it nicely.

ViaCrucis · Wednesday at 11:00 PM

Canuckster said:
what do you mean?

That your levels of copium are dangerously high.

-CryptoLutheran

RileyG · Wednesday at 11:01 PM

NxNW said:
I believe "satire" is the word you're looking for.

Ok. Lol! My mistake

I’m not surprised by anything Trump says anymore….to put it nicely.

NxNW said:
I was phrasing it nicely.

got it!

ViaCrucis · Wednesday at 11:01 PM

NxNW said:
View attachment 367501

FAKE NEWS! HOAX! DEMOCRATS INFILTRATED MAGA AND THEN REPLACED TRUMP WITH A ROBOT!

-CryptoLutheran

ViaCrucis · Wednesday at 11:16 PM

RileyG said:
That...won't happen. AFAIK, it's not legally possible? to run for a third term?

Someone can kindly correct me if I'm wrong...?

The 22nd Amendment set term limits for presidents, they get two. Before the passing of the 22nd Amendment a limit of two terms was customary, but not set in law--at least partly because George Washington refused to run for a third term and so only served two terms. So it was never law, but it was customary. FDR is the only president to have served more than two terms, successfully running and winning both a third and fourth term. The idea that someone could run, indefinitely, had never been put to the test, then it was. Even if you like FDR (and I'd say I do), the idea of someone being able to run indefinitely definitely isn't great. So, the 22nd Amendment passed and was ratified in 1955.

So, right now, as long as the 22nd Amendment stands, Trump would be unable to run for a third term. The 22nd Amendment would need to be repealed for Trump to legally run gain in 2028. Emphasis on legally. This administration has demonstrated, quite flagrantly, that it has zero regard for the Constitution. So I guess we'll see what happens in 2028.

-CryptoLutheran

ViaCrucis · Wednesday at 11:17 PM

RileyG said:
Epstein didn't like just women...***shudder*** He was a predator.

That's probably a Democratic hoax too. /satire

-CryptoLutheran

Canuckster · Wednesday at 11:28 PM

essentialsaltes said:
Hey, the government has strict rules about what they can say ahead of an election.

(I mean, OK, Jim Comey can ignore that stuff if there's dirt on Hillary, but still, there are rules.)

(And for all the help he provided, he's under investigation and his daughter at DOJ got fired.)

are you serious? Dems get an opportunity to trash Trump ahead of an election but choose to follow rules? If there was an emoji to show my expression in response to this I'd post it.... but I don't think there is one so I wont waste time looking

Canuckster · Wednesday at 11:31 PM

NxNW said:
They sure hung out a lot talking about women they liked.

Yes... and I'm sure you were right there eavesdropping on their conversations

Canuckster · Wednesday at 11:34 PM

Trogdor the Burninator said:
They're Schrodinger's conspiracists - not intelligent while simultaneously running the world media, infiltrating the Republican party and rigging elections.

That's not the dems... that's their globalist handlers... the ones running the auto pen.... even Trump admits those are of very high intelligence.... like Satan.

Bradskii · 2025-07-17T00:04:42-0500

Canuckster said:
As for myself, I’m believing the FBI/DOJ just as Trump is; that there’s no info in those files that incriminates any other than a dead man, and that Epstein was never Trump's friend.

Of course. As you said:

Canuckster said:
And if there was a "list" incriminating Trump and repubs they for certain would have released it before and during the election.

So there's nothing there. They would have released it! Yet Trump doesn't believe that.

'Trump went on to suggest that all of the files from the federal investigation into his late friend, the convicted sex offender Epstein, should not be released because they might include false information about him planted there by his Democratic rivals.'

So who do I believe. You, who has absolutely no idea what's in the files? Or the president, who can check them out any time he likes and desperately doesn't want them released. Hmm. Tough call.

Trump doesn't want anymore support from those who push the "Jeffery Epstein Hoax"

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Veteran

Veteran

Fact-Based Lifeform

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Confessional Lutheran

Veteran

Confessional Lutheran

Confessional Lutheran

Confessional Lutheran

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

Similar threads