- Oct 17, 2011
- 41,780
- 44,873
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Why are these enemies of the people allowed to ask questions of our commander in chief?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's a difficult situation. My after the fact inclination is to say that given that the camp was in a place known to be prone to flooding, when the warning came out the previous day they should have made sure someone was in a position to get alerts. But warnings aren't very specific. It would be interesting how often warnings like this happened. Still, if I were running a kid's camp in a flood plain, I'd want to make sure I monitored the situation.
Well over a hundred people were drowned. Many of them children. It was avoidable. If you aren't interested in looking to see who was at fault then there's the +Unfollow button at the top right of the thread.Wow, thread is thirteen pages long. Can't believe people are still desperately grasping at straws to try to politicize a natural disaster.
If you've paid any attention to this thread, the arrow of blame is pointing more and more to local Kerr County officials, not Trump or the NWS.Probably Trump’s awkward response in saying a question was “evil” was in relation to a viewpoint that blames him for the flood. How much is true or not is hard to assess and whether it is a political drumbeat or not.
Wow! Irrational partisan political media really erodes reasoning skills.“I’m here to ask this court today to send this money back to the Biden administration, which I consider to be the most criminal treasonous communist government ever to hold the White House,” one resident told commissioners in April 2022, fearing strings were attached to the money.
“We don't want to be bought by the federal government, thank you very much,” another resident told commissioners. “We'd like the federal government to stay out of Kerr County and their money.”
Really because according to the NWS they had extra personnel on staff during the storm.The National Weather Service’s San Angelo office, which is responsible for some of the areas hit hardest by Friday’s flooding, was missing a senior hydrologist, staff forecaster and meteorologist in charge, according to Tom Fahy, the legislative director for the National Weather Service Employees Organization, the union that represents Weather Service workers.The Weather Service’s nearby San Antonio office, which covers other areas hit by the floods, also had significant vacancies, including a warning coordination meteorologist and science officer, Mr. Fahy said. Staff members in those positions are meant to work with local emergency managers to plan for floods, including when and how to warn local residents and help them evacuate.That office’s warning coordination meteorologist left on April 30, after taking the early retirement package the Trump administration used to reduce the number of federal employees, according to a person with knowledge of his departure. --NYTIf you fire or promote staff reduction, then expect decline in capability. If you cut funding, expect a reduction of equipment affecting capability. It's not rocket science and the warnings declared long before this flood. But don't worry, Marge Greene has introduced legislation to get at the real root of the problem which are “lasers or blue beams of light” from “space solar generators” manipulating weather. Kind of like covid, climate change don't care. Weather is getting more chaotic and we have the same party as Greene cutting funding that even hurts farmers farm, while wanting to kill FEMA and let states fend for themselves. It's a constant cycle of "What's the Matter with Kansas".
Lol an article from The NY Times? Like they’re a credible source. The NWS was issuing flash flood alerts since the day before the incident.If you would have read beyond the first paragraph of the article I quoted earlier in the tread, you would have read that staff shortages at the NWS and the inability to coordinate with local officials in a timely manner were an issue.
Well one thing you can surely do if you hear a flash flood warning is to get away from the river bank. It’s literally the most dangerous place you could possibly be during a flash flood warning.Some camps go pretty deep into the wilderness. Aside from that, the folks in charge likely had safety plans in place. Liability is always a prime motivator for that. But nothing can really be done when it comes to a wall of water flash flood.
I think you may want to reread both what I posted and what you posted and look at tasks. How do meteorologists get their forecasts and who is tasked to make sure the communities receive those forecasts in emergency scenarios? Again, that guy took the Trump retirement and was not replaced.Really because according to the NWS they had extra personnel on staff during the storm.
“Where the office would typically have two forecasters on duty during clear weather, they had up to five on staff.”
“There were extra people in here that night, and that's typical in every weather service office — you staff up for an event and bring people in on overtime and hold people over,” Runyen said.
![]()
National Weather Service shares timeline of alerts ahead of catastrophic Texas flooding
NWS says Flash Flood Warnings were issued on July 3 and early July 4 in Central Texas, giving more than three hours of warning.www.nbcdfw.com
What’s your point? If they’re going to lie we’re going to lie to?One can say the same thing about all the comments the right makes and has made about Joe Biden.
From the NYT article:Lol an article from The NY Times? Like they’re a credible source. The NWS was issuing flash flood alerts since the day before the incident.
Oh so you didn’t read the part about the flash floods warnings being broadcast the day before the incident? Who cares where that guy was the fact is that the warnings went out the day before it happened.I think you may want to reread both what I posted and what you posted and look at tasks. How do meteorologists get their forecasts and who is tasked to make sure the communities receive those forecasts in emergency scenarios? Again, that guy took the Trump retirement and was not replaced.
Yeah the NWS is only responsible for sending the warnings out, they’re not responsible for who is monitoring them or not.From the NYT article:
...former Weather Service officials said the forecasts were as good as could be expected, given the enormous levels of rainfall and the storm’s unusually abrupt escalation.
Around midnight on Thursday, the San Angelo and San Antonio weather offices put out their first flash flood warnings, urging people to “move immediately to higher ground.” The office sent out additional flash flood warnings through the night, expanding the area of danger.
It is not clear what steps local officials took to act on those warnings.
Mr. Sokich said that the local Weather Service offices appeared to have sent out the correct warnings. He said the challenge was getting people to receive those warnings, and then take action.
The NYT article was accurate and reported that warnings had been issued correctly and in a timely manner.Yeah the NWS is only responsible for sending the warnings out, they’re not responsible for who is monitoring them or not.
That's not entirely true. Pulled from above.Yeah the NWS is only responsible for sending the warnings out, they’re not responsible for who is monitoring them or not.
As I mentioned earlier I worked at over a half dozen different YMCA camps. I also worked at one commercial camp.
Counselors or leaders were those who had direct contact with the campers. Sometimes that terminology applied to those in charge of an area like horseback riding, go karts or rifle range. Sometimes it was only used to refer to those directly overseeing the campers and almost by definition sleeping in the same cabin.
Those who would be monitoring phones i the manner you mention would be on the directing staff. Though in a situation where there has been any initial report that would indicate that close monitoring was called for I would hope they would be actually monitoring the super local conditions. Local is where one first knows water has overflowed or is about to overflow the banks.
I know that the better directors I worked with would have been closely following reports.
Not me. I had a reputation. I would have ended up checking and rechecking escape routes.
My bet is that some reporter heard a councilor complaining about the no phones policy and never even thought to ask if anyone had a phone. 90% chance doing so mainly because it meant they could not chat with their boy/girlfriend. And now it keeps getting hammered on. Though if the director was one of the poorer ones I worked with I can see the complaint being made for all the right reasons.