One judge doesn't really have the authority to override Congressional law.
Tell me you haven't read the constitution in a while without telling me you haven't read the constitution in a while.
You can skip right to Article III:
Welfare mothers are one of the biggest drains on SNAP and Medicaid.
No kidding. Who do you think those benefits are intended for?
This is like saying sick people are one of the biggest drains on hospitals.
I was raised by a single unemployed parent on welfare. And after I turned 18 and left home, she went to work for my brother-in-law's company. Which indicated to me that she was able to work and earn a living during my childhood but chose not to.
What switched when you left the house?
Saying it's just a matter of self-control and that they shouldn't have sex makes it easy for people to condemn them. Condemning them is making them "others." It makes a person condemning them feel smug and good about him or herself. It shows a lack of empathy.
As explanations or remedies that can be used at scale, self-control and free will are greatly overrated. The majority of people operate at the behest of whatever chemical mixtures are coursing through their brains at any given moment, oblivious to how significantly their life and behavior can be altered just by tweaking those levels.
For one example - I can find a host of people on this board who'll likely champion the notion of free will but who are absolutely horrible at policing their own media intake and, as a result, wind up constantly living in fear of some "other" and just generally more irritable and angry. They're not "exercising free will" and deciding to be fearful and angry; they're being manipulated into it. There may be some free will in their choosing what to consume, but there are likely a lot of other factors in that decision as well - for example, how much time do they have to consume media? What's available to them during those times? How much agency do they have in choosing which media to consume? What other content have they been made aware of? What content have the algorithms fed to them? How do their brains respond to different kinds of media? You ask them questions probing how they know what they think they know and they frequently can't even begin to answer those questions. They haven't rationalized themselves into those positions; they've been funneled into them.
For another example - I've recently started trying different medications to treat mild ADHD and it is absolutely wild how much of an effect even a small dose can have on my ability to focus on certain activities. It's not across the board, either - different kinds of activities and emotions are impacted in different, sometimes opposite ways. It's highlighted how some things I've wanted to change are legitimately compulsive, while others are behavioral, and some are in some fuzzy grey area in between. Some of these compulsions (mainly related to anxiety, if you're curious) are things have had significant impacts on my life in the past, including influencing large career decisions and despite living with them every single day for years, with a pill, they're just gone. I'm as self-aware as anybody; I thought I was free-willing myself into those decisions, but I wasn't. At least not entirely.
IMO "free will" is a lazy solution backed into by people who don't or can't understand complex problems, who don't like the idea of government interventions, who want to absolve society of responsibility for improving certain kinds of problems, and who like pointing the finger at people they perceive as less deserving.