Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It’s not about association. They can live as they want, as long as they respect the rights of others.
Some women don’t want to share the restroom with a biological male. That’s their right.
Good grief, it's like a broken record. You keep saying this - on behalf of women I might add, when you cannot produce any evidence that it's even a problem. And then refuse to tell us how you are going to accomplish something that's not even necessary.
They can live as they want, as long as they respect others who are uncomfortable.
What if a trans person is uncomfortable with prejudiced people in the bathroom? Oh wait, I know the answer to this one.
Isn't it.
Again. It’s not prejudice.
Yeah, it is. It's prejudice to assume negative things about trans people based on a preconceived notion, instead of any actual evidence. Making an assumption about the mental health status of trans people, and assuming that means they are prone to attacking women in restrooms, when there is absolutely no evidence that has ever happened, is the very definition of prejudice.
Of course it is, if she assumes all men are going to act like her attacker did. Understandable perhaps, but still prejudicial.
But no one has to respect the boundaries or comfort level of trans people. Got it.
Again. They have every right to live their life as they want, as long as they are respectful of those who disagree with their lifestyle.
What about the boundaries and comfort level of women?
But those who disagree can be as disrespectful as they like, and are empowered to use the law to legislate their prejudice.
Yup. Prejudiced folks need to be respected and protected by law from an assumed threat for which there is no evidence, but trans people are subject to punishment and undue restrictions without ever having done a thing to deserve it.
I don’t think it’s prejudiced. Some people just don’t think men can become women or vice versa. Like I said before, a tiny minority cannot force their extreme agenda onto others. Trans people made their choice, now they have to live with it.
What about them? At what point is someone able to use their personal discomfort to limit the rights of those who have done nothing to cause that discomfort beyond simply existing?
What's private about a public bathroom? Now, granted, if it was the bathroom in their own house, they might have a point.
So one group's comfort level deserves to be legislated, while the other is simply ignored. Gee, is that the American way now?
I mean, why should a man have a right to use the restroom just because he calls himself a woman? It simply blows my mind.
It's a prejudgment, a judgment made beforehand. A preconceived opinion about someone or an entire group of people is prejudging them.
Yup, that's a good example of the kind of preconceived opinions I was just talking about.
They're not forcing anything on anyone. They just want to go to the bathroom!
Yup, they exist. Now they have to pay for that.
You are catering to the comfort of trans people at the expense of women.
Because that person considers herself a woman, so she wishes to use the restroom that corresponds with her gender.
SSI requires proof of age. Do bathrooms require proof of genitalia?
I don’t care what he considers himself as. Reality and biology says otherwise.
They are like anyone else. If they want to go to the restroom, go to the correct one. Males in men, females in women. Simple.
