• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why would a nation have a sovereign wealth fund?

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
7,957
5,751
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟379,389.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Reasons Nations Establish Sovereign Wealth Funds
Nations create sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) for several key economic and strategic reasons:

1. Stabilizing Government Finances

Many SWFs are designed to stabilize a country's economy by managing the volatility of revenues, especially for nations dependent on commodities like oil, copper, or diamonds. By saving excess revenues during boom years, these funds can be used to support government budgets during downturns, smoothing out the effects of fluctuating commodity prices and reducing the risk of economic instability.

2. Saving for Future Generations

SWFs allow countries to convert finite, non-renewable resources into lasting wealth. By investing proceeds from natural resources or trade surpluses, nations can build up savings to benefit future generations, ensuring long-term prosperity even after resources are depleted.

3. Diversifying the Economy and Investments

By investing in a broad range of global assets, SWFs help diversify a country's wealth beyond its primary sources of income, such as oil or exports. This diversification reduces reliance on a single sector and helps protect the economy from sector-specific shocks.

4. Supporting Economic and Strategic Development

Some SWFs are used to drive domestic economic development by investing in infrastructure, nurturing key industries, and supporting the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). They may also be used to create "national champions"—prominent domestic companies in strategically important sectors.

5. Maximizing Returns on Excess Capital

When countries accumulate large fiscal or trade surpluses, holding these as cash is often inefficient. SWFs allow governments to invest surplus funds in global markets to maximize returns, rather than letting the money sit idle.

6. Managing Currency and Trade Surpluses

For countries with persistent trade surpluses, SWFs can help manage foreign exchange reserves and prevent excessive appreciation of the national currency, which could harm other export sectors.





 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard T

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
7,957
5,751
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟379,389.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The United States does not currently have a federal sovereign wealth fund. However, more than 20 U.S. states—including Alaska, Texas, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Wyoming—operate their own state-level sovereign wealth funds, some of which date back to the 19th century. These state funds are typically funded by revenues from natural resources or other state assets.

At the federal level, the U.S. government has historically not maintained a sovereign wealth fund. Recently, however, there has been movement toward establishing one: On February 3, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the Treasury and Commerce departments to develop a plan for a United States sovereign wealth fund, with recommendations for funding, investment strategies, and governance to be submitted within 90 days. As of June 2025, this fund is still in the planning stage and does not yet exist.

In summary:
No federal U.S. sovereign wealth fund currently exists.
Multiple U.S. states have their own sovereign wealth funds.
A federal fund is under consideration and planning, but has not yet been established.
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
7,957
5,751
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟379,389.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Raised by bees
Mar 11, 2017
22,130
16,638
55
USA
✟419,375.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
The United States does not currently have a federal sovereign wealth fund. However, more than 20 U.S. states—including Alaska, Texas, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Wyoming—operate their own state-level sovereign wealth funds, some of which date back to the 19th century. These state funds are typically funded by revenues from natural resources or other state assets.

At the federal level, the U.S. government has historically not maintained a sovereign wealth fund. Recently, however, there has been movement toward establishing one: On February 3, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the Treasury and Commerce departments to develop a plan for a United States sovereign wealth fund, with recommendations for funding, investment strategies, and governance to be submitted within 90 days. As of June 2025, this fund is still in the planning stage and does not yet exist.

In summary:
No federal U.S. sovereign wealth fund currently exists.
Multiple U.S. states have their own sovereign wealth funds.
A federal fund is under consideration and planning, but has not yet been established.
What's the point of such talk by the administration? The US doesn't have spare cash floating around to create a SWF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
7,957
5,751
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟379,389.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What's the point of such talk by the administration? The US doesn't have spare cash floating around to create a SWF.
From my understanding of SWF, they are created based upon the different kinds of quality and quantity of National resources and assets.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Raised by bees
Mar 11, 2017
22,130
16,638
55
USA
✟419,375.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
From my understanding of SWF, they are created based upon the different kinds of quality and quantity of National resources and assets.
I thought we had a massive debt. You can't open a bank account with debt.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,749
19,408
Colorado
✟541,879.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
I thought we had a massive debt. You can't open a bank account with debt.
You can borrow to fund speculative investing. Its dangerous but people do it all the time. Not sure I want my govt playing that game.
 
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,180
2,026
traveling Asia
✟136,024.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Just like a citizen that has lots of debt, the best advice is to pay off the existing debt before going into investments. However, there are some economists that argue that if the borrowing rate is say 4% for debt a government can invest it and if they can average even 6%, it can reduce their debt. It is risky though to do that. There was some speculation that Trump would put bitcoin in this fund. Instead he is stockpiling the seized bitcoin in a reserve though I am not sure if this reserve will become or can be considered "sovereign fund."

A better example is Norway. Better because it runs a huge surplus and better because retirement monies are placed in the sovereign fund. So the government earns a better return on their investments. "Norway recorded a Government Budget surplus equal to 13.20 percent of the country's Gross Domestic Product in 2024. Government Budget in Norway averaged 10.29 percent of GDP from 1995 until 2024"

Norway is the exact opposite of the USA. The USA accumulates massive debt per person while Norway has massive savings. "The Government Pension Fund Global (Statens pensjonsfond utland), also known as the Oil Fund (Oljefondet), was established in 1990 to invest the surplus revenues of the Norwegian petroleum sector. As of March 2025, it had over US$1.738 trillion in assets,[2] and held on average 1.5% of all of the world's listed companies, making it the world's largest single sovereign wealth fund in terms of total assets under management.[3][4] This translates to over US$325,000 per Norwegian citizen.[5]"

Norway's second wealth fund is "The Government Pension Fund Norway is smaller and was established in 1967 as a type of national insurance fund. It is managed separately from the Oil Fund and is limited to domestic and Nordic investments and is therefore a key stock holder in many large Norwegian companies, predominantly via the Oslo Stock Exchange."

The trust fund of USA social security in a sense is a sovereign wealth fund. However, since the government has taken all the surplus and spent it, the trust fund can only invest in USA debt on paper. It is given IOU's that will allegedly support social security until the surplus runs out. The IOU's are now starting to be cashed putting another strain on the USA budget.

"The effective interest rate earned on all obligations held by the (USA SS) trust funds in 2022 was 2.4%; the average interest rate on new special issues was 3.0%."

Imagine how big the USA SS trust fund would be if they actually invested even half of it in stocks. I would guess that the SS payments could have been doubled for every American. While risk should be frowned upon, there is not much risk if you invest for the long-term. The surplus social security has been running for decades sop this was a bad choice to raid those funds and give IOU's.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Raised by bees
Mar 11, 2017
22,130
16,638
55
USA
✟419,375.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
You can borrow to fund speculative investing. Its dangerous but people do it all the time. Not sure I want my govt playing that game.
Yikes. I've also heard some chatter about the gold deposit or the SS Trust fund or a crypto "currency" reserve..
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
7,957
5,751
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟379,389.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Although this article is more than 3 months old, I believe it provides an interesting analysis.
 
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
3,458
5,855
51
Florida
✟310,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I'll be honest. I don't think there's anything wrong with a SWF in most sanely and responsibly governed countries. However, when you factor in a 34 time convicted felon and adjudicated rapist as the arbiter of that fund I think it will probably just be a slush fund for the convicted felon to dip into with impunity for his own personal gain.
 
Upvote 0