- Sep 4, 2005
- 27,295
- 16,577
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Define "large portions"?Except you don't contradict my point. Yes, half the population in the state live in Denver, more specifically, the Front Range Urban Corridor, it shows that the Democratic majority of the state assembly is because of the more urban areas of the state. If you map out the various districts, you find that the Eastern and Western areas of the state, the large rural areas particularly on the plains, tend to be very red, with the center part of the state more blue (though even an area like Colorado Springs leans red).
So, no, I'm not saying "Every last person in a state needs to support and celebrate LGBTQ." I'm saying that when you have large portions of a state that would pass anti-LGBTQ laws, if they weren't outnumbered by the large city in the center of the state, the state is not really "one of the most progressive in the nation." Instead, Denver (like almost all large cities) is progressive, and the rural parts of the state are not.
As of December 2023, a public (PRRI) poll indicated that 78% of Colorado residents supported same-sex marriage, with 20% opposed and 2% undecided (and that number is higher when factoring people in who may not agree with marriage, but still support anti-discrimination laws for housing, employment, and accommodations)
And with regards to the Trans aspect of that, the same polling entity (PRRI) in 2019 found that:
77% of Colorado residents supported laws protecting LGBTQ+ individuals from discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations. This suggests a strong inclination toward supporting transgender rights within the broader context of LGBTQ+ protections.
To put numbers like 77-78% support in context, compare that to percentage breakdowns on other issues.
If you can get 78% of people in a state to agree on an issue, in terms of politics, that's a landslide victory.
To put it in more highlighting terms, gay rights in Colorado are more popular than the "constitutional carry" laws in Texas. (which is only around 60%)
Would anyone suggest that Texans who love guns have any legitimate or practical need to ramp up their activism/advocacy for pro-gun causes? Or would most tend to agree that they've pretty much accomplished what they were trying to accomplish, and there's not much need for pro-gun rights advocacy in Texas?
Last edited:
Upvote
0