• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

President Trump Declassified The Assassination Files Of JFK, RFK, and MLK "Wow"!

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
41,623
22,306
US
✟1,688,924.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
40,673
43,735
Los Angeles Area
✟978,013.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
This is the same use of "special we had in elementary school, right?
Heaven forfend! I certainly wouldn't want to give the impression that these people held repugnant views due to something entirely beyond their control. Their repugnancy is chosen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
40,673
43,735
Los Angeles Area
✟978,013.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Social Security numbers and other private information unmasked in JFK files

The Social Security numbers and other private information of more than 200 former congressional staffers and others were made public Tuesday in the unredacted files related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, according to a review by The Washington Post.

“It’s absolutely outrageous. It’s sloppy, unprofessional,” said former Trump campaign lawyer Joseph diGenova, 80, whose private information was included in the release.

[He sounds defensive, where was he in 1963?]

The Post, in its review of the previously redacted material, discovered the Social Security numbers, birthplaces and birth dates of more than 100 staff members of the Senate Church Committee, established in 1975 to investigate abuses by America’s intelligence agencies and government. The Post also discovered more than 100 Social Security numbers of staff members of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which investigated the killing of Kennedy. Many of the individuals are still alive.

Many whose Social Security numbers were exposed had become high-ranking officials in Washington. They include a former assistant secretary of state, a former U.S. ambassador, researchers in the intelligence world, State Department workers and prominent lawyers.

“In some of these documents, the only thing that was being redacted for the last 20-plus years was someone’s Social Security number,” Zaid said. “It is dangerous for these individuals, who can now be doxed.”

[Yes, but if they shot JFK, maybe this transparency is warranted.]
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FreeinChrist
Upvote 0
Jul 12, 2010
412
525
United Kingdom
✟270,549.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

Social Security numbers and other private information unmasked in JFK files

The Social Security numbers and other private information of more than 200 former congressional staffers and others were made public Tuesday in the unredacted files related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, according to a review by The Washington Post.

“It’s absolutely outrageous. It’s sloppy, unprofessional,” said former Trump campaign lawyer Joseph diGenova, 80, whose private information was included in the release.

[He sounds defensive, where was he in 1963?]

The Post, in its review of the previously redacted material, discovered the Social Security numbers, birthplaces and birth dates of more than 100 staff members of the Senate Church Committee, established in 1975 to investigate abuses by America’s intelligence agencies and government. The Post also discovered more than 100 Social Security numbers of staff members of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which investigated the killing of Kennedy. Many of the individuals are still alive.

Many whose Social Security numbers were exposed had become high-ranking officials in Washington. They include a former assistant secretary of state, a former U.S. ambassador, researchers in the intelligence world, State Department workers and prominent lawyers.

“In some of these documents, the only thing that was being redacted for the last 20-plus years was someone’s Social Security number,” Zaid said. “It is dangerous for these individuals, who can now be doxed.”

[Yes, but if they shot JFK, maybe this transparency is warranted.]
Why would this information be included in the files? That seems completely unnecessary.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
41,623
22,306
US
✟1,688,924.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why would this information be included in the files? That seems completely unnecessary.
That tells me these are not files specific to the assassination investigation but everything peripheral to it.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

One nation indivisible
Mar 11, 2017
20,597
15,629
55
USA
✟393,935.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Not everything the CIA has done has been bad.
I didn't say or imply that. Just noting that their incompetence had also revealed things that were not intended to be revealed at this time (like the SSNs).
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,092
6,786
72
✟370,372.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Yeah he declassified it today and it all got posted to the internet an hour later.
Yup, his rush to impress people like you resulted in at least one instance of a lawyers social security number being included in the released files. It should have been redacted.

I wonder how many more similar mistakes will be noted before the dust clears.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
41,623
22,306
US
✟1,688,924.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I didn't say or imply that. Just noting that their incompetence had also revealed things that were not intended to be revealed at this time (like the SSNs).
What was incompetent about having a complete dossier on everyone touched by the investigation? Remember: Back then nobody used their SSN as security information--that didn't happen until the Internet era. When I was first in the military, our SSN was just a numeric version of our names. Heck, we had it imprinted on our bank checks. It meant nothing...back then.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Belk
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,092
6,786
72
✟370,372.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
What was incompetent about having a complete dossier on everyone touched by the investigation? Remember: Back then nobody used their SSN as security information--that didn't happen until the Internet era. When I was first in the military, our SSN was just a numeric version of our names. Heck, we had it imprinted on our bank checks. It meant nothing...back then.
Having a complete dossier is far from incompetent. Releasing classified documents without redaction would normally be considered incompetent. But the blame there goes to the top, the guy who ordered the release without anything even close to enough time to properly review the documents.
 
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,560
4,339
Midlands
Visit site
✟725,793.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Having a complete dossier is far from incompetent. Releasing classified documents without redaction would normally be considered incompetent. But the blame there goes to the top, the guy who ordered the release without anything even close to enough time to properly review the documents.
You are right; 61 years is not even close enough time to review the documents properly.
o_O
:)
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
41,623
22,306
US
✟1,688,924.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You are right; 61 years is not even close enough time to review the documents properly.
o_O
:)
Of course, nobody has been reviewing them all this time. Those are records put away by the current staff's grandfathers.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
26,105
14,441
63
PNW
✟917,532.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Yup, his rush to impress people like you resulted in at least one instance of a lawyers social security number being included in the released files. It should have been redacted.

I wonder how many more similar mistakes will be noted before the dust clears.
Not people like me, as I wasn't particularly interested in the release.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
26,105
14,441
63
PNW
✟917,532.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Of course, nobody has been reviewing them all this time. Those are records put away by the current staff's grandfathers.
In a deep underground vault that absolutely no one had access to. I'm surprised Geraldo Rivera wasn't there when the thing was finally cracked open.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
26,105
14,441
63
PNW
✟917,532.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

One nation indivisible
Mar 11, 2017
20,597
15,629
55
USA
✟393,935.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
What was incompetent about having a complete dossier on everyone touched by the investigation? Remember: Back then nobody used their SSN as security information--that didn't happen until the Internet era. When I was first in the military, our SSN was just a numeric version of our names. Heck, we had it imprinted on our bank checks. It meant nothing...back then.
I said nothing nor intended to about those who created the documents. Only those that released them w/o redacting PII. (You know who you are Pam.)
 
Upvote 0