- Oct 2, 2011
- 6,061
- 2,239
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Ex 25:
1Sa 21:
Matthew 12:
Why not?
Because of the exceptional circumstances.
His disciples broke the letter of the Sabbath law, but they were not guilty because he, the Lord of the Sabbath, allowed them to do it. He used the situation to teach about the true purpose of the Sabbath and his authority as the Lord of the Sabbath. This incident underscores Jesus’ emphasis on mercy, compassion, and the spirit of the law over strict legalism.
Le 24:30 Place the Bread of the Presence on the table before Me at all times.
On every Sabbath, the priests ate the old Bread of Presence and replaced it with the new, probably unleavened bread.8 Every Sabbath day the bread is to be set out before the LORD on behalf of the Israelites as a permanent covenant. 9 It belongs to Aaron and his sons, who are to eat it in a holy place; for it is to him a most holy part of the offerings made by fire to the LORD—his portion forever.”
1Sa 21:
David took and ate the bread on a Sabbath day.6 The priest gave [David] the holy bread, for there was no bread there but the Bread of the Presence, which is removed from before the Lord, to be replaced by hot bread on the day it is taken away.
Matthew 12:
According to the Pharisees, Jesus' disciples violated the Sabbath law. According to Jesus, did they?1 At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. His disciples were hungry and began to pick some heads of grain and eat them. 2 When the Pharisees saw this, they said to him, “Look! Your disciples are doing what is unlawful on the Sabbath.”
Jesus agreed that David technically broke the letter of the law. He wasn't allowed to eat the holy bread. But were David and his men guilty?3 He answered, “Haven’t you read what David did when he and his companions were hungry? 4 He entered the house of God, and he and his companions ate the consecrated bread—which was not lawful for them to do, but only for the priests.
The priests worked on the Sabbath, like replacing the Bread of the Presence with the freshly made new one. Even the priests desecrated the letter of the Sabbath law, but they were not guilty.5 Or haven’t you read in the Law that the priests on Sabbath duty in the temple desecrate the Sabbath and yet are innocent?
Why not?
Because of the exceptional circumstances.
Jesus pointed to himself as an exceptional circumstance.6 I tell you that something greater than the temple is here.
Because of Jesus' presence, his disciples were innocent, not guilty of picking some heads of grain and eating them on a Sabbath day.7 If you had known what these words mean, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent.
According to Jesus, did his disciples break the Sabbath law?8 For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.”
His disciples broke the letter of the Sabbath law, but they were not guilty because he, the Lord of the Sabbath, allowed them to do it. He used the situation to teach about the true purpose of the Sabbath and his authority as the Lord of the Sabbath. This incident underscores Jesus’ emphasis on mercy, compassion, and the spirit of the law over strict legalism.
Last edited: