• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

1 poll finds majority of Greenland respondents support joining US

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,824
3,135
London, UK
✟1,122,471.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Trump has reiterated his desire to purchase Greenland, as the country has been of strategic importance to the U.S. since at least the Cold War.

Trump is the man to do the deal!
A more credible source suggests that 85% oppose it:


The thing is how you phrase the question. If Trump were to say I will give each Greenlander 500000 dollars to join the USA. That would cost him 25 billion, which is peanuts to the USA, then I think you would get a more positive result. If on the other hand, he pays Denmark then it will never happen because Denmark knows the people do not want that. Many Greenlanders live on welfare paid for by Denmark. So if there is no compensation to individual Greenlanders they have no incentive to vote for this as they would undoubtedly be worse off under a Trump Musk anti-welfare regime.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
34,386
21,343
Orlando, Florida
✟1,650,739.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
For strategic purposes, warding off the Russians and Chinese up north is excellent. It'll protect Canada and protect the backs of Norway and Finland. With military installations there their economy might prosper.

"Greenland occupies a pivotal position at the crossroads of key Arctic waterways and serves as a gateway to the North Atlantic. The Greenland-Iceland-United Kingdom (GIUK) Gap is considered one of the most consequential strategic corridors for Russian submarine approaches to the eastern U.S. and Canadian coastlines".


The US already have military bases in Greenland and friendly relations with both Greenland and Denmark.

There was no security need for Trump to attempt to humiliate Greenland or Denmark. Frankly, Trump's rhetoric comes across as either bullying/trolling, or absurd and insane.
 
Upvote 0

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
5,746
2,407
66
NM
✟133,659.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The US already have military bases in Greenland and friendly relations with both Greenland and Denmark.

There was no security need for Trump to attempt to humiliate Greenland or Denmark. Frankly, Trump's rhetoric comes across as either bullying/trolling, or absurd and insane.
Just the space force is there. Oh, but there is a security need and yes I agree with the rhetoric sometimes.
 
Upvote 0