• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Voting by Mail?

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,182
✟553,140.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
What has been proposed by Republican state legislators (and immediately shot down by the other party) is for the state governments to furnish ID's free of charge to every voter who cannot afford one and doesn't have a photo ID of any sort at present. How the opponents can be incensed by that approach, as the opponents indeed are, is hard to appreciate.

That's not universal, though. In my state the GOP proposal was to require a specific list of types of voter ID after researching which types of ID were most difficult for minority voters to obtain.

But in any case, I'll reiterate my proposal to allow vaccination cards to be the acceptable form of voter ID. They're available to everyone for free, after all. No one could possibly be "be incensed by that approach" for any reason.
 
Upvote 0

Ponderous Curmudgeon

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2021
1,477
944
67
Newfield
✟38,862.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
It's good to know that such reasonable measures are in place in some state(s).

But then, what is the reason for people to support policies in other states which allow these signatures not to be checked...or of making the policy be to accept ballots that come with no signature at all??

It would seem reasonable to want to strengthen such procedures in order to have voting integrity, but states with Democratic-controlled legislatures or a Democratic governor have refused all such reforms when they've been proposed.
What evidence do you have that signatures aren't checked on mail in ballots anywhere? Or are you just making this up like most of your assertions.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
26,340
22,212
✟1,842,435.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Colorado began mail-in voting for everyone in 2013. We have had a Democratic governor since 2008. The HoR has been controlled by the Democrats since the 2012 election. The Senate - D in 2012, R in 14 and 16, D in 19 and 20.

Colorado is 1/3 R, 1/3 D, and 1/3 Unaffiliated voters that can and do vote either way and often by the individual candidate's platform so both R and D are fighting for those votes.
For this reason, I think we have more moderate Dems. than are found in many states.

It's only been in the last election that I remember seeing radical candidates.
In 2016 Republicans in this state didn't vote for Trump in the primary, they chose Cruz.

....and Arizona has a similar vote by mail in place for over two decades....implemented and managed by Republicans - Republicans who believe voter participation is a good thing (....at least our county level officials still believe that).

....yet yesterday, here is the former POTUS - still asserting the BIG LIE over 1 year later.

"I love Arizona. We had a tremendous victory in Arizona that was taken away. ... We had a rigged election. ... (The media) refuse to talk about it. The Big Lie is a lot of bull----. That's what it is.

Trump returns to Arizona with talk of possible endorsements
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,265
✟584,022.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
....yet yesterday, here is the former POTUS - still asserting the BIG LIE over 1 year later.
Don't be so quick to protest. After all, Hillary is still promoting the BIG LIE with regard to her own defeat in 2016, and that loss was not a result of the irregularities and illegalities that characterized the 2020 election.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
26,340
22,212
✟1,842,435.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Don't be so quick to protest. After all, Hillary is still promoting the BIG LIE with regard to her own defeat in 2016, and that loss was not a result of the irregularities and illegalities that characterized the 2020 election.

Do you agree with former President Trump? Was his victory in Arizona "taken away"?
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,265
✟584,022.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Do you agree with former President Trump? Was his victory in Arizona "taken away"?
I don't know enough about it to say (which is what other people who are pounding the computer keyboard and complaining about Trump's comments concerning the electoral mess in AZ should be saying themselves).

However, the goings-on there that I have read something about do make it seem clear that there were many irregularities that could easily have affected the outcome.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,265
✟584,022.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Trump takes his denial on tour, but what about Hillary?
She's been making her complaints to the press directly. Which of those is more brazen--speaking to one's supporters or making allegations to the media in anticipation of it being widely circulated by them??
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
26,340
22,212
✟1,842,435.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't know enough about it to say (which is what other people who are pounding the computer keyboard and complaining about Trump's comments concerning the electoral mess in AZ should be saying themselves).

However, the goings-on there that I have read something about do make it seem clear that there were many irregularities that could easily have affected the outcome.

You don't know enough to say? ...and continue to cast shade on our state's election.

You could have just answered "yes"
 
Upvote 0

FredVB

Regular Member
Mar 11, 2010
5,173
1,056
America
Visit site
✟350,148.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I do not think the voting would make any difference, anyway. Everyone has an idea of some issues, and they disregard the rest. Now we have some issue being dealt with from having the winner coming into office while other issues remain disregarded. I had no expectation it could be better.
 
Upvote 0