- Apr 13, 2006
- 29,630
- 16,815
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Greens
I know who you were quoting. It was utter balderdash. YOu'll note I explained the basic premise of communism. And then you don't address the meat of the argument.I was quoting Karl Marx. You know?...the father of communism in his book about communism?
Please address the point.We are talking about Elon Musk, not Mark Zuckerberg. Please stay on topic.
ROFL! Great. Just great.It is actually 80% less of what Twitter was. Get your facts straight.
Thank you for the correction that illustrates my counterpoint better.
Making stuff up ain't gonna work.Mainly because it went private
X now worth only 25% of what Elon Musk paid for it
Oh! Interesting. The share value INCREASED FAscinating.What caused X’s value to decrease?
The value of X's shares actually increased by about 22 per cent immediately following Musk’s announcement to acquire the company, then known as Twitter.
OH! Poor decision making eh? I guess he figured people would love racist people spouting off nonsense and it gettin pushed onto them.However, share prices began to fall again following several controversial decisions by Musk: chief among them was the decision to rebrand Twitter to X, changing the company’s name and logo.
Some experts expressed concern with the decision at the time, arguing that the Twitter brand was too recognisable to change.
Musk also completely revamped the platform’s verification system.
Ahhh...what we can make ourselves believe...that a billionaire would CHOOSE to lose 40 billion of value.Elon didn't buy it to make a profit.
Of course he bought it to make a profit...and to satisfy some silly pecadillos (he always wanted a company named "X").
Upvote
0