You're quoting a source which says it is unreliable.
en.wikipedia.org
I'd respond but the links to the articles have already changed after a week. Try to do as Wikipedia suggests - read and quote the secondary sources. You may be surprised to find out they don't say what you think they do.
No link - no reference. Not sure where your table comes from - Instagram?
This is a link to the video of the picture you see.
Notice that in the background Bashar al Assad is being announced. This is Syria - not Gaza.
Why you would post a false picture in support of the murder of toddlers is beyond me.
No, that's just people standing on a rooftop. The rest is conjecture, or considering your previous picture, a straight up fabrication.
But really? People standing on a roof is your best evidence?
No link - lemme guess - Instagram?
More plagiarism from Wikipedia.
Still no evidence of Human Shields. Read the links. They don't say what you might think they say.
Your understanding is wrong.
You can read about it in the Talmud or in Jesus in the Talmud by Peter Schafer.
Your support of Israel makes sense then.
I give you a link to a book by an Israeli Jewish Historian - You give me nada. No sources - just suppose to take the word of an Atheist.
Zero.
As has been repeatedly said when Zionists are trying to make another point, Palestinians have never had a chance to have an independent state.
No. Once again, you're not reading.
I said Israel is required by international law to vacate Gaza, East Jerusalem, the WestBank, and the Golan Heights. This includes all settlers and citizens. I never said anything about laying down weapons. They are more than welcome to keep their weapons.