-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Was Charles Lindbergh right about World War II?
- Thread starter TigerKanga
- Start date
Of course he was right. If the British, the Jews and Roosevelt had just stopped agitating for war, there would've been no war.
Oh wait, I forgot about Pearl Harbor, and the Germans and Italians declaring war on us.
Oh wait, I forgot about Pearl Harbor, and the Germans and Italians declaring war on us.
Upvote
0
Did you notice what happened to those people Lindbergh mentioned? The British won the war. The Jews got Israel. Roosevelt got his third term. Funny, not funny ha ha.
Upvote
0
Called what? Victory you mean? To me he sounds like a modern-day Keith Olbermann or Rosie O'Donnell.
Upvote
0
Roosevelt's 3rd term Presidency. He called it in the prewar speech. Not bad for an antiwar speech pre-WWII.
He sounded clear and rational in his arguments to me. Impressively so as like I said, he called it like it later happened.
As you compare him to odd people I infer you must have a problem with his message. So either you are British and you were for the war which is unlikely as most Brits these days aren't so convicted. Or you are Jewish and don't like what Lindbergh said about them or you have an affinity for Roosevelt and feel Lindbergh slighted him. Gee, I wonder what your hang up is. Where could your animosities possibly lie. I know, you are Roosevelt's great great nephew looking to run for city council.
Upvote
0
Well, darn, you nailed it. I'm a British Jew nephew of Roosevelt and am running for city council. Of course being a British Jew great nephew of Roosevelt seeking election is the only possible basis one could have for disagreeing with Nazism/fascism, right? 
Upvote
0
Well, darn, you nailed it. I'm a British Jew nephew of Roosevelt and am running for city council. Of course being a British Jew great nephew of Roosevelt seeking election is the only possible basis one could have for disagreeing with Nazism/fascism, right?
That explains it. I've heard many Presidents have been related to the Queen of England. Its all in the bloodlines of the lizard people.
Upvote
0
laconicstudent
Well-Known Member
- Sep 25, 2009
- 11,671
- 720
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
The Nazis kind of had a habit of confiscating the property of people in concentration camps, yes.
Upvote
0
Tropical Wilds
Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
- Oct 2, 2009
- 7,436
- 5,595
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Similar threads
- Locked
