- Jul 20, 2018
- 10,277
- 7,364
- 70
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It depends on how you define stolen and who exactly stole it. Could the national media blackout of the Hunter Biden laptop story be considered stealing the election? Could social media's ban on public discussions of it be considered stealing? Could "fifty current and former intelligence officials" signing on to what they knew was a lie be considered stealing the election? Could Mark Zuckerberg's spending millions of dollars to "register voters" in urban heavily-Democratic areas while ignoring rural Republican-leaning voters altogether be considered stealing the election?I am just wondering where we stand here.
I am just wondering where we stand here.
It been proven that the election wasn't stolen. Trump's lawyers all admitted in court that there was no fraud.I am just wondering where we stand here.
Links?It been proven that the election wasn't stolen. Trump's lawyers all admitted in court that there was no fraud.
Links?
Links?
Thank you.![]()
In Court, Trump's Lawyers Aren't Claiming 'Massive' Fraud
While the President and his lawyers make histrionic claims in public, the campaign's legal filings are narrow in scopetime.com
They had no case. If they would have claimed it, while knowing it never happened, they would have been charged with pergury.lThank you.
The lawyers should have stayed with the charges of fraud. In my opinion, they made their case weak by being wishy-washy.
I disagree. I believe that they had a case. In too many states, there were election laws that were changed by governors or a secretary of state. By law, the laws of a state are only supposed to be changed by the state legislators or by the voters instead of politicians in the executive branch.They had no case. If they would have claimed it, while knowing it never happened, they would have been charged with pergury.l
The National Review said the article made claims with no evidence to back it up.@Yarddog
May I have your thoughts about the following article from Time.com
![]()
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutionstime.com
Do you believe The National Review?The National Review said the article made claims with no evidence to back it up.
Why not? They are a Conservative magazine which is shooting down a conspiracy theory which would help a conservative candidate.Do you believe The National Review?
For over a decade, I have not trusted them to be actual conservatives. I believe that they ain't really America first or really constitutional conservatives.Why not? They are a Conservative magazine which is shooting down a conspiracy theory which would help a conservative candidate.
I don't think there are many Constitutional Conservatives.For over a decade, I have not trusted them to be actual conservatives. I believe that they ain't really America first or really constitutional conservatives.
So if they did think it was stolen, there might have been negative repercussions if they had said so.They had no case. If they would have claimed it, while knowing it never happened, they would have been charged with pergury.l