• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Donald Trump fraud verdict: $364 million penalty in New York civil case

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,737
6,292
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,140,974.00
Faith
Atheist


NEW YORK (AP) — A New York judge imposed a $364 million penalty Friday on Donald Trump, his companies and some executives, ruling that they engaged in a yearslong scheme to dupe banks and others with financial statements that inflated the former president’s wealth.

Trump, who built his reputation as a real estate titan, also was barred from serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation for three years.

However, the judge backed away from an earlier ruling that would have dissolved the former president’s companies.


Trump’s lawyers vowed to appeal.
 

7thKeeper

Venture life, Burn your Dread
Jul 8, 2006
2,528
2,387
Finland
✟184,890.00
Country
Finland
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Also it's in NY, so to appeal he has to put up like half the judgement into escrow and if the judgement is ignored then the state will start seizing assets.
From what I've heard, it has to be the full amount to appeal.
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
7,469
5,142
NW
✟273,820.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
FB_IMG_1708133787799.jpg
 
Upvote 0

RoBo1988

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2021
1,377
968
64
Dayton OH
✟146,350.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
NY governor Hochul says that Trump is "special" case. Other investors need not worry.

 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
8,340
5,948
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟429,792.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Critics have noted that Trump is the only person ever to be sued under an obscure New York fraud statute that does not require any harm be done, and that effectively criminalizes the everyday practice of real estate valuations in negotiations with banks.

Though Attorney General Letitia James — who ran for office promising to target Trump — claimed that no one is above the law, her case against Trump marks the only such case in the history of the state. And the staggering fine is likewise unprecedented.

Jonathan Turley points out another astonishing fact at the New York Post: before he can appeal, Trump must pay the whole fine:

Under New York law, Trump cannot appeal this ruling without depositing the full amount, including interest, in a court account. Even for Trump, $455 million is hard to come by. Likewise, a bond would require a company to guarantee payment for a defendant who has been barred from doing business in New York and is facing the need to liquidate much of his portfolio.
Nothing succeeds like excess for judges like Engoron. By imposing this astronomical figure, he can make it difficult or impossible for a defendant to appeal, absent declaring bankruptcy or selling off assets at distress prices.
The excessive fine and its basis raise serious statutory and constitutional questions. Many of us believe it should be substantially reduced or tossed out entirely.
Engoron also refused to allow Trump to mount any defense, declaring Trump guilty via summary judgment for the state.
 
Upvote 0

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,451
4,805
Washington State
✟374,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Critics have noted that Trump is the only person ever to be sued under an obscure New York fraud statute that does not require any harm be done, and that effectively criminalizes the everyday practice of real estate valuations in negotiations with banks.
Maybe they should start going after everyone else. Goodness knows there are enough people who abuse the system.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Beardo
Mar 11, 2017
22,634
16,941
55
USA
✟427,887.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Engoron also refused to allow Trump to mount any defense,
Not true, that's what half of the trial was. (The other half was prosecution.)
declaring Trump guilty via summary judgment for the state.

That's how civil trials work. Causes of action that are demonstrated beyond the standard of proof in pre-trial motions for summary judgment can be rules as such. The other side gets the same opportunity to reply with evidence of their own and challenges to the evidence (just like cross-examination) and typically there is a hearing too on the motion. In the case of NY v. Trump et al. Justice Engoron ruled in the NY AG's favor on *one* of the causes of action (the biggest one to be certain) after motions and arguments. The trial covered the other 6 or so causes of action and the penalties. There was no reason to spend court time on items with complete rulings.
 
Upvote 0

7thKeeper

Venture life, Burn your Dread
Jul 8, 2006
2,528
2,387
Finland
✟184,890.00
Country
Finland
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Maybe they should start going after everyone else. Goodness knows there are enough people who abuse the system.
And I'd be curious about that claim of "obscure" statute as to it's accuracy. Somehow I suspect that it's not quite as obscure as some would like to claim.
 
Upvote 0

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,114
8,363
✟417,413.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Critics have noted that Trump is the only person ever to be sued under an obscure New York fraud statute that does not require any harm be done, and that effectively criminalizes the everyday practice of real estate valuations in negotiations with banks.
63 (12) has been around a long time, and James has particularly aggressive in using it. Granted this appears to be the first time it was used without an aggrieved consumer, but that doesn't matter. Even though usually used as a consumer protection statute there is no requirement in the law itself for a victim. As for supposedly criminalizing real estate valuations, there is a difference between presenting an optimistic valuation, and lying about material facts about the property that would substantially affect the value. That's what Trump did. It's one to say a particular piece of property is worth such-and-such an amount per sq-ft and another to say it is worth such-and-such a sq-ft and then claiming it is three times the size it actually is. That's one of the things he did.
Though Attorney General Letitia James — who ran for office promising to target Trump — claimed that no one is above the law, her case against Trump marks the only such case in the history of the state.
I've already addressed this.
And the staggering fine is likewise unprecedented.
My understanding is that no damages were award. The "fine" was a disgorgement, which is the giving up of profits obtained through illegal actions. Because of the value of some of the real estate in question, that was a large number.
Jonathan Turley points out another astonishing fact at the New York Post: before he can appeal, Trump must pay the whole fine:
Not actually true. He needs to post a bond for the same amount, but it's a bond which means he can get a bond company to pay the amount for a portion upfront. Of he could if he wanted to post the whole amount which would mean he doesn't have to pay anything assuming he wins. But either way it makes sense as a way to ensure that the appeal has some merit otherwise it would just clog up an already full court system.
Engoron also refused to allow Trump to mount any defense
If you mean by trial, that is true for only one part of the complaint. The other three causes of action were all debated in a trial since they involved significant questions of fact. The 63 (12) item though didn't require any questions of fact and so was decided by summary judgment. And summary judgement requires both parties to submit briefs so it's not accurate to say that Trump did not have a chance to mount a defense.
, declaring Trump guilty via summary judgment for the state.
Liable, not guilty.
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
8,340
5,948
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟429,792.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How many more wealthy conservative businessmen will the courts in New York sue under this obscure law that has very rarely been enforced this way?
It's important to note that most experts in this topic have told news sources that the so-called over valuing or even under valuing of property by owners is a very common practice in New York and other states. Yet, The Trump organization appears to have been singled out to be the one of the only ones targeted.

As for liberal wealthy businessmen, I have zero doubts that New York will care about enforcement of that law in this manner.
 
Upvote 0

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,451
4,805
Washington State
✟374,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
How many more wealthy conservative businessmen will the courts in New York sue under this obscure law that has very rarely been enforced this way?
It's important to note that most experts in this topic have told news sources that the so-called over valuing or even under valuing of property by owners is a very common practice in New York and other states. Yet, The Trump organization appears to have been singled out to be the one of the only ones targeted.

As for liberal wealthy businessmen, I have zero doubts that New York will care about enforcement of that law in this manner.
Who says they are going to be all conservative? Maybe they will just go after those that broke the law by a set amount to priorities?
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
8,340
5,948
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟429,792.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Who says they are going to be all conservative? Maybe they will just go after those that broke the law by a set amount to priorities?
Maybe they should. But they won't.
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
8,340
5,948
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟429,792.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,785
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,688.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Upvote 0