• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

If the Apocrypha books were rejected as Scripture why were they included in the 1611 KJV Bible?

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,107
6,081
New Jersey
✟393,650.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The books of the Apocrypha have a different canonical status in different Christian traditions. The Catholic and Orthodox traditions include them in their canon, because they were part of the Septuagint. Many Protestant traditions exclude them from their canon, because the Jewish community ultimately decided to exclude these books from their canon. The Anglican tradition includes the books but gives them a secondary status as being useful for Christians to read.

Since the King James translation was sponsored by the Church of England, the books of the Apocrypha were included in the translation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

Tuur

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2022
2,321
1,251
Southeast
✟82,565.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not every major denomination recognizes the same books as canon. Early on, there was debate among believers over which books should be considered canon, and which should not. I'm likely wrong, but I think the apocrypha was held to be in a sort of different class in the West, at least until the Council of Trent, which happened during the Reformation. By that time, protestants tended to question whether the intertestamental books were divinely inspired. Protestants noted that the apocrypha are not included in the Jewish canon, and things went from there.

The real question, then, is when did Protestant bibles drop the apocrypha. Protestant bibles that included the apocrypha had the books in a separate section. A search turns up the date 1629, but I haven't found if something specific happened that year, or if some Protestant bibles started dropping the apocrypha then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

Athanasius377

Is playing with his Tonka truck.
Site Supporter
Apr 22, 2017
1,377
1,520
Cincinnati
✟789,345.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The Apocrypha was included in the translation of the KJV because it was an Anglican translation meant for the Church of England. The Church of England has this to say about the Apocrypha in her confessional document called the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion:


And the other books as Hierome [Jerome] saith, the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners, but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine.

Bray, G. (2009). The Faith We Confess: An Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles (p. 41). The Latimer Trust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lanceleo
Upvote 0